If, in an alternate universe, the same conditions were met to

no

there can only ever be one observer at any given point in space time, that is to say you can't see the universe from 2 places at once so it would be you, but another you not the same one

>>18250552
or maybe i got that wrong and it's

>yes

>there can only ever be one observer at any given point in space time, that is to say you can't see the universe from 2 places at once so it would be you, but another you not the same one

>>18250557
You can see from the two different locations in space time at which each of your two eyes exist. What if what we sense is so similar that it's melded together by our consciousness and the differences manifest themselves as deja vu much like the differences in our vision manifest themselves in a sensation of depth in a three dimensional vision.

>>18250572

i dunno

are you gonna eat those fries?

>>18250578
Thanks for the (you) senpai

Seeing how any particular individual arising depends on the highly random meeting of two gametes, the population of parallel universes would be one of the things to more rapidly diverge.

Basically, the slightest difference in when and how your parents had the shag, and it's not you but your alt-brother. Personal parallels likely only exist if already born before the divergence.

>>18250504
figuratively yes literally no

Nope..."I" would`nt feel the same sensations, even if alternate circumstances would have build an exact copy of myself. This would only come true if the rest of the parallel unvierse would also have been build the same way as "our" Universe, and therefeore it would`nt be paralell anymore but a copy.

>>18250504
you dont even know that a multiverse exists and all of this is happening right now but it does

DOS