Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
TheLiberator
Hollow Earth Debunked 2016-09-03 22:04:20 Post No. 18091775
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Hollow Earth Debunked 2016-09-03 22:04:20 Post No. 18091775
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: hollowearthdebunked.jpg (25KB, 480x360px) Image search:
[Google]
25KB, 480x360px
Q: How does hollow earth sustain life inside
>It cant - Debunked
>With a mini-sun
>Sun burns at a set rate
>Our sun is bigger than inner-earth sun
>therefore, inner earth will die before our outter sun
>Find rate X that a sun burns at
>Estimate size of inner earth sun
>Calculate Y years until inner sun burns out
>Take earth's age minus Y years
>When answer = 0, we die
>When answer = negative, hollow-earth debunked
>>
>>18091775
The sun doesn't burn, retard, it's just as hollow.
>>
>>18091787
Then why do you put sunscreen on at the beach you utter tard
>>
>>18091791
Because the heat's only made in the atmosphere, in space the suns energy is aetheric, dingus.
>>
>>18091808
Other here. If you think that sunburn is related to heat, please be 12 somewhere else.
>>
>>18091787
>sun doesn't burn
It turns hydrogen into helium, and helium into lithium. A hollow sun would die even quicker
And if you're suggesting it doesn't produce heat, you are suggesting hollow earth has no atmosphere in which case, does not sustain life, in which case is debunked
>>
The earth doesn't have the mass to sustain a thermonuclear reaction.
Therefore, an object inside of the earth, with less mass, wouldn't be able to sustain itself.
>>
I don't believe in hollow earth, but just to clear some things up ITT:
Lower mass stars burn slower, not faster. A star with lower mass than our sun would burn longer.
Some types of stars could fit inside the earth, but we would FOR SURE know they were there because our gravity would be much higher.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1