Saw some random youtube video and stumble on to something.
Something in the sky of mars, its barely visable but it you edit it a bit, well you get this. The full image gets to big of size.
But check it out for yourselfs, what do you think it is?
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA20602
Heres without any adjustmenst except size and arrow. Check the link above!
good find OP i cropped the triangle shape in the image in my post
this was taken from the JPG of the nasa page, not the tif, one of the best martian sky anomalies ive seen so far
Probably a processing error. You can tell by the long artifact strip running down vertically. These images have to be stitched together.
mars is a fake just like the moon
>>18007543
Then how do you explain my stargate?
>>18007556
How do you explain my stargate from your stargate to his fake Mars, huh?
Checkmate, Canadians.
Nice UFO find, but this isn't on Mars.
We have never been to "Mars".
This is all filmed in a desert on Earth.
>>18007846
Yes because deserts have red skies. This bait is too juicy.
>>18007859
Through a red filter they do smartass.
>>18007846
>>18007859
>>18007860
Yes it's through filters, the camera only takes pictures in black and white. They have various filters to, well, filter out light, then three (or more) are assembled to a color picture. This is pretty much true color, ie what a human would see >>18006377
However, they also have a set of filters tuned such that the lighting conditions and color are similar to Earth. Why? Because geologists are trained on Earth to look at rocks. Way easier to look for interesting rocks when the lighting and color are similar.
>but how does it compensate for different times of day and shadows
Look up MarsDial, it's actually a pretty ingenious system. No point of failure and light weight.
>>18008137
i.e. we take black and white pictures on Earth, color it to look like what people think Mars looks like
>>18006374
You're a fucking faggot, you cunt.
>>18008240
This is not /b/ you imbecille