Any more /x/ book charts???

The Golden Bough by James Frazer is missing in that list

>>17893560

Okay. What should it replace?

>>17893630
Bardon :^)

>>17893641

I was trying to play nice. Beelzebub's?

The Secret Teachings of All Ages by M.P. Hall
Kybalion

>>17893648
Duquette possibly.

>>17893651

No, not the Kybalion. Too misleading.

>>17893652

I'll accept that and wait for objections.

>Frazer in, the Maestro out.

File: 1465999680956.jpg (207KB, 1440x1440px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1440x1440px

>>17893651
>Kybalion

When will this meme die?

Any good resources on Greek gematria?

not op btw

>>17893652

At some point we really do need to hammer out a base curriculum, something concise enough to put in a graphic just like this, if at all possible.

>>17893671

I think Crowley did one, didn't he? If so, probably in Ape's mega.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/fulcanelli_mysterecathedrales.pdf

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/dwellings_philosophers.pdf

I feel that these two books are very crucial.

>>17893678
I thought Crowley is notoriously messy with the Greek Kabbalah? But thanks anyways.

>>17893706

Find out for yourself.

File: 1449189856772.png (929KB, 1404x2133px) Image search: [Google]

929KB, 1404x2133px

>>17893498
Lol I remember the first time I came to /x/ back when fringe was still here.
>But then the new fags started to pour over the gates.

>>17893997
Thanks, Just got "In Search of the Miraculous" from the first chart at a local book store today. Ill look into the ones on this chart.

>>17893498
>>17893997
Fuck it. Saving both anyway.

>>17893630
Don't think it should replace anything.. It's just a book you need to read if you're into the subject of occult and magic.

So what will reading these books fill you with? what are they supposed to help with.

Are there any systems of thought, esoteric systems - or w/e ( spiler: I don't care about the paranormal aspect ) but rather some cool montherfuckers like the 20th century foundations for hermetic qabalah for example - put years of thought in their ideas, and inspired from psychology resulting in a profound, worth thinking about system / ideas which can be taken outside of any paranormal context and applied to day to day life.

>>17895411
>Don't think it should replace anything..

In the graphic. Context matters.

>>17895484

Depends upon the book. Some are highly informative, some less so.

>>17895490

Yeah: magick.

Why no Zohar?
Or all those ancient Grimoires like Lesser/Greater Key of Solomon, and such?

File: tmp_13496-51hnDH_JS6L1867870164.jpg (47KB, 336x500px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 336x500px

Another /x/ book thread and no Illuminatus Trilogy.

You fuckers should be ashamed.

>>17893498
Is Vril:The Coming Race considered /x/ tier?

Robert Anton Wilson's books are cool.. I see Prometheus Rising in that chart but his other books are cool too.. I love the first Cosmic Trigger.. He talks about the occult and magick and psychedelics and conspiracies and all kinda shit in a really entertaining way.. And he approaches the subjects with an agnostic mindset claiming he doesn't believe or disbelieve any of this stuff.. Although I think he did believe in a lot of this stuff haha.

Agrippa's Three Books of Occult Philosophy
Jung's work, especially concerning the collective unconscious and the archetypes
The Great Albert
The Small Albert
Liber Null and Psychonaut
Enchiridion of Pope Leo

File: king-in-yellow.jpg (168KB, 825x1252px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 825x1252px

>>17899784
>>17899787
Everyone always recommends the King in Yellow but the people who have read it will /always/ tell you that only 40% of it is worth reading. Hell, if we're really being honest you might as well stop at 'The Repairer of Reputations' (Which is pretty damn good) and then read some Lovecraft.

>>17893674
Seems like a bit of hassle. Most people that want these charts are bored kids. Those who really want to get into it would be willing to search.

>>17893662
what?

>>17903342
GO back to lurking, newfag.

>>17903344
is that your only response?
assuming i'm new?

>>17903357
GO back to lurking, newfag.

>>17903366
lol

>>17903224

It wouldn't matter who saved and reposted such a graphic, so long as it was reposted. Could a baseline curriculum be winnowed down to just ten books, as Crowley once did? That might make for an image with some impact.

The goal should be a reasonably well-informed student, someone who can at least engage the material, ask meaningful questions, and understand the answers. Even if only a handful of anons got that far we could count ourselves very successful.