Took this photo a couple of years back now. It was taken very

I think you super imposed a photo of yourself and are now attempting to pass it off as paranormal 1/10

>>17660283
It isn't superimposed and i didn't say it was paranormal. I don't know what it is. Feel free to analyse it or whatever. There is most likely a simple explanation involving lense refraction or something. All i can say is i was alone when i took the pic

>>17660290
Dude, you would have taken it in /p/ if you really just wanted to know what the problem with the camera was. Its just a neat little accident that you're trying to pass off as paranormal.

>>17660344
Its a phone camera. I just thought it was interesting and was looking for some discussion. I haven't manipulated the image in any way. I wouldn't know how

>>17660272
>those trees aren't very tall and tower above him.
>what is a hill

>>17660412
The trees line a path. There is no hill.

>>17660272
You're the reason people don't take me seriously when I tell them I'm a magician!

>>17660444
You're a wizard Harry...

>>17660357
Pretty neat OP does he look fimiliar to you by any chance?

>>17660646
Not at all. I even posted it on Facebook to see if anyone recognised him but nobody did. It was taken local to where i live

>>17660283
This

>>17660785
Dude i promise you that it isn't super imposed. I look nothing like that guy. Surely someone can analyse the image to prove that it isn't manipulated. There would be layers?

File: 217887_363504987054503_670728612_n.jpg (54KB, 708x708px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 708x708px

I took this photo when I was alone and nobody was there and when I came to look at it later there was 2 ghosts in it I am very spooked please help

>>17660802
That photo is fucking terrifying lol