Sacred Geometry

File: NAUTILUS.jpg (27KB, 400x500px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 400x500px

I'm also looking for cool Sacred Geometry pictures.

>>17654398
It isn't. It's just "pick a pattern and assign arbitrary meaning to it, occasionally finding ways to bullshit it to other things so you can shout to everyone how it's 'everywhere' and must therefore be extremely important."

In short, it's nonsense.

>>17654431

Please direct us to your thread which isn't about 'nonsense'.

The theory is sacred geometry was used by the mass consciousness to craft the universe.

>>17654438
You won't find one on /x/, friendo, aside from that one /x/ vidya thread, and that's only because it's not "halp my shadow's been replaced by a alien wat do!!?!"

>>17654448

Then it's the "Why do you spend all your free time here if you think /x/ is dumb?" question time.

>>17654452
Because making fun of idiots amuses me.

File: 1433042809573.gif (1007KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

1007KB, 500x500px

>>17654449

>>17654452
It's a case of "Wow, I may not be the cleverest person in the world, but at least I don't believe in space jews and other stupid shit."

>>17654456
You're here too, and you're an idiot. Think about it.

>>17654463
Much comeback, very wow.

>>17654459
>I may not be the cleverest person in the world, but at least I don't believe in space jews and other stupid shit.

It's good you acknowledge that you're stupid. So then you try to be with your peers where you fit in, all while pretending you're better than them. Quite the lifestyle.

>>17654463
That biting comeback broke my fragile little heart, guess I'll go cry and never return to /x/ because of how thoroughly you rekt my scrub ass.

>>17654472
>pretending
Nah, there's no pretending to it. I'll admit that I'll never be the king of snappy comebacks like you, though.

>>17654464
But still how does finding meaning in mathmatical patterns mean people who do this are stupid.
Stupid people would just write it off as nonsense.

>>17654438
>Hurr does wearwolvs real?
>How do I shot sex tulpa
>wat if angles is reely teh bad guys?
You tell me.

>>17654485
Assuming there's inherent meaning in a pattern of circles is stupid, especially when you can take another pattern, add things to it to include your original pattern, and go "Holy shit, the first pattern is in everything!"

File: 1461529350107.jpg (199KB, 1200x835px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1200x835px

>>17654456
In that case you may want to read this and give me your opinion my smart friend.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.1847v2.pdf

>>17654398
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hK8Bh9oP_g

>>17654501
Okay, so let's say that the universe IS a simulation. Is that going to somehow profoundly impact your life? Are you going to gain matrix powers because "WE'RE ALL IN A SIMULATION THAT'S INDISTINGUISABLE FROM REALITY, WAKE UP SHEEPLE!"?

File: owls.png (1MB, 1280x962px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x962px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwYfuJfIgaw

Walt Disney on Sacred Geometry

>>17654525
By your argument theoretical physics as a field of knowledge is nothing and shouldn't exist.

If you can't find an use for something it doesn't mean that it does nothing.

>>17654554
Still waiting on an answer.

File: cypher.jpg (29KB, 663x422px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 663x422px

>>17654525
Cypher detected.

Enjoy your steak.

>>17654542
I can't figure Walt Disney out.

What did he want? After learning about his plans for Epcot it's kind of unnerving.

>>17654561
I'm perfectly okay with being Joe Pantoliano.

>>17654567
Why didn't you take the blue pill?

>>17654566
What was so unnerving about epcot? From what I can tell he was for a future city project in which progress would be the fundamental principle. Its the story of western civilization, I don't see anything unnerving about it, unless you enlighten me.

File: 1462066632703.jpg (2MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1536px

>>17654559
Fair enough.

If the universe is a numerical simulation there's a formula out there for everything, so you can predict any event in the universe by just making a mathematical observation.

Also if the universe is a numerical simulation it must have boundaries, at macro scale and micro scale.

So we can keep making bigger computers to make massive calculations, or colliding hadrons to make smaller and smaller particles until we simple break the fabric of the universe and we can make a new universe or fuck shit up completely (It's what we are doing anyway).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDfQo1ANeLM

Because things like the Fibonacci sequence are found everywhere. Our minds grapple with modeling reality through mathematical structures that can be used as solid concepts to navigate the world, there is truth in them. The prevalence of sacred geometry is some indicator that we are seeing valuable information that can benefit conceptual models

File: walt-disney-florida-project-epcot-112113.jpg (124KB, 676x456px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 676x456px

>>17654601
His obsession with sacred geometry goes beyond just drawing. He wanted to create a civilization based on it, which included building layouts, neighborhood layouts, and so on as far as possible.

>Yesterday, Disneyland and the NY World Fair. Tomorrow a project so vast it has already been called 'a whole new Disney World.

Amidst this planning, Walt Disney died of lung cancer. Won't say this is a conspiracy, but after his death, the plans were dropped entirely and Disney's Florida park became an amusement park rather than a new civilization, which was what Disney was planning. If you're interested consider this documentary from 1966, right before Disney died.

Really starts at 6:30 unless you want the prologue of how the park in Florida developed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLCHg9mUBag

Keep in mind that Disney over time had bought large tracts of land in central Florida prior to this, secretively I must add.

Really would have been interesting if he didn't die.

File: 1390017759447.jpg (249KB, 500x501px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 500x501px

I have lots of pics.

>>17654657
Well I mean even DC was planned according to so called sacred geometry. Its just Masonry leaving its mark, most major cities have an obelisk and circle beneath it, its not nearly as spooky as it is just cultural, courthouses and temples are built these rules because its aesthetically pleasing, it creates uniformity and cohesion.

Western civilization has prints.

>>17654657
>>17654669
thanks for the links btw, ill check them out.

>>17654669
And, unlike Disney, were rarely talked about.

>>17654672
well before Disney died, it was all about enlightenment to these kinds of things, now the name Disney is corrupted, its a shame because he was a great individual that wanted to uplift. Look at Disney now and its a shitfest.

If you've never been to Epcot its wonderful, the hall of presidents is pretty awesome still to this day. Maybe it could be updated a bit, its been awhile since i've gone.

>>17654685
Compared to the vid, what Epcot is today is comparable to early Disney to today's Disney. I'm not saying what Disney had planned is good by the way. There's a chance he was very genuine, or he might have desired a very large amount of power. And I think it's because of Disney, as a society we look down on cultish groups, like Waco or the Westboro Baptist Church.

>>17654696
Well I was talking more about Disney media than the theme parks.

The city planned for Disney world is wouldn't have really been exclusionary, they would have been open and would have functioned as a worlds fair, as a city of tomorrow, not anything like a segregated community.

To me it would have been far better of a tourist attraction than just a run of the mill theme park. But I guess Epcot among the rest of Disney world isn't as uniform as most theme parks. I would have liked to have a city constantly changing towards what we view as the future. Watching your vid now. Maybe what I thought Epcot was supposed to be is idealistic.

File: Binczewski-9511.fig.1.large.gif (16KB, 580x715px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 580x715px

>>17654669
I have this.

Is the request for the pyramid at the top of the Washington obelisk.

Laus Deo.

>>17654741
thank you, that's really cool, though I honestly have a hard time reading it.

>>17654720
Seemed more cultish to me, but more of a technological one. Would have been equally interesting and terrifying.

File: 7051458527_0f521afa3c_o.jpg (3MB, 3215x3980px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3215x3980px

>>17654769
No problem I got it from here, the whole story is interesting.

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/9511/binczewski-9511.html

At one point I researched a lot around the building of D.C.

Damn masons and their city size ARGs.

>>17654456

Only a retard would spend his time arguing with people he deems retards.

>inb4 you aren't arguing
>you're 'trolling' /x/

underage ban m8

>>17654786
Well think about what cult really stands for, its a root word of culture of occult as in o-cult, within a circle (o) as in exclusive.

The main problem we have with cults is that they end up being different than the cult they are within (then becoming exclusionary) which if its in America that cult would be within the existing culture of America. A cult is only bad when it goes against the culture its already in, hence why these fanatic cults are viewed poorly.

Disney world would have been at the crossroads of all the major interstate highways in Florida and was and still is a place welcoming of strangers, as long as they come in legally with good intentions. Its fundamental really of every civilization that you have borders, its not really evil in my view as it is just precautionary and just a rule of keeping your interest protected.

>>17654796
Not really just to you but, what I view as the foundation of sacred geometry is to think of god as an architect. He created space in three dimensions, so being closer to god is to take divine inspiration and project that into the world. You do these things by having the inspiration first, working it out and then putting it into practice. Like an architect has a "vision" of what he wants, he then sets out the planning and goes out into three dimensional space and creates it. Its man power not just through the work but manpower in his ability to shape the world around him. That's what the District of Columbia is.

The idea that a product or the fruits of our labors come from the mind is attributable not just to architecture but everything we see. Man is closer to god by just going out and creating, I don't think its about an alternate reality but more about altering reality. This is good.

The foundations of life and human civilization are magical based on the principles we can attribute to god, in what we used to call "magical", now we call it i"mag"inative. Root words, and symbols, signs and sigils.

>>17654876
But it appears that Disney's intentions was to create a self sufficient city state which would challenge the authority of the US. It would only be a matter of time before someone who lived in Epcot would have a complete different reality than of an average US citizen.

>>17654803
Stay mad, kiddo.

>>17654908
Yeah but that reality still would have been distinctly American, it just would have been a futuristic America. I mean if the core idea is that it would have been the City of Tomorrow, an experiment, then from that he is trying to make his city an example. Compared to Jonestown that was just exclusionary for the sake of protecting itself from outside influence, Epcot would have been THE influence.

Look at America, they broke off from the European monarchies, created their own system, and then the whole world followed suit. There isn't many countries in the world today that aren't based on the American style of government with some small changes or watered down. The founding fathers shaped their world, and so the rest of the world with it. I just think Walt was trying to do the same thing on a different scale of a new kind of city that would be influential. It would have been his legacy.

>>17654908
I mean it would have still been an American city, subject to state laws and under the Federal rule. It only would have been an exception to what we understand as a city now. Unless I missed something.

>>17654856
How is the right side of the stick going through the siding?

File: james_clark-sealofgod.jpg (105KB, 657x656px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 657x656px

>>17654398
because math and physics and all the dynamic working world are connected. once this was understood to be but not why or how, we have gotten away from that thinking. its underlying idea is important.

File: mtree.jpg (37KB, 500x422px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 500x422px

>>17654994
the underlying nature of all things together were once considered, parts of a whole, aspects of a working system. as we learn more it is apparent the small and the large are ruled by the same forces. a drop in the oceans ripples, the dynamic of a wave.

File: sno angles.jpg (149KB, 630x842px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 630x842px

>>17655008
the technique of some sacred geometry is laughably antique. But its idea could progress us as a species to transcendence.

>>17655016
angles and angels

File: thermo.jpg (17KB, 300x544px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 300x544px

>>17655016
of course that underlying nature was once thought of as god, but by the time we look that heaving and bright thing out the corner of our eye, we will probably call it named, tagged and mundane. awe and wonder fall short once we perceive something understood.

File: poke.jpg (67KB, 570x401px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 570x401px

>>17655025
but that keeps us reaching.

>>17654952
>>17654972
But this city

>wouldn't watch any media from outside Epcot
>wouldn't teach academics in any way they wanted
>possibly would create their own college/university
>possibly would build their own space program

And most important would create a distinction between someone who lived in Epcot versus someone who didn't. This kind of stuff is a zero sum game and isn't allowed. They would pay taxes sure, but eventually the difference between an Epcot citizen and a US citizen would become very different.

>>17655041
>wouldn't teach academics in any way they wanted

would*

>>17655041
1st I've never heard of any of this, its sort of exciting. Is there a reference for this? I didn't see any of it mentioned in the video.

>wouldn't watch any media from outside Epcot
Is this even a bad thing? It was intended as an experiment after all.

>would teach academics in any way they wanted
I believe a desire to create uniformity and standardization in academics is more cultist than simply having different schools of thought. As long as what they teach is true and people are benefiting what is the actual problem?

>possibly would create their own college/university
A university of Walt Disney would have been interesting. Thomas Jefferson founded a University too. I mean look at the problems of colleges in the west now. I believe its on account of the universal cult of "social justice" that hurts students. That and the idea you don't get anywhere in this world without some college. If the methodology would have been different maybe it could have been refreshing, I doubt any differences in how Epcot would have run or how its citizens would have behaved would be any more disparate than say the difference between NYC and LA.

>possibly would build their own space program
Way ahead of its time, there are plenty of privately owned space programs nowadays. Things move from the private sector to the public and if that was already in his vision that's amazing and a little bit crazy.

Now if Walt had lived to be dictator of this city and decided he wanted to secede from the union that would have been a problem, but again all I get from the intentions that I know of is that it would have been something new. If he started recruiting for an army of Disney then you could be worried but I don't see it, why would Disney who made his living making media for American audiences and creates theme parks that allows outsiders try and make a place that would separate itself from Americans. I don't think that's how it works.

The math version of nuclear secrets. Secrets that can save time, money, and manpower. They make what seems impossible into the possible.

>>17655041
You are assuming that the rest of America would stay on its normal course rather than following the lead of Epcot. I do not think this is a good assumption.

Our physical reality revolves around symmetry. As far as I've seen, much of life reflects the symmetric nature of reality. I believe that 'sacred geometry' is a testament to how 'holy' or 'godlike' the underlying mathematics that produces geometric sequences and patterns that in turn drive our symmetric reality seem to us.

>>17654431
How can patterns that exist in unrelated objects and concepts be arbitrary?

That's like saying "Cows are made of atoms and sheep are made of atoms but that's just arbitrary, you're making connections where there aren't any"

What the fuck are you talking about?

>>17654398
the reason that if someone goes the speed of light and comes back that they are given an aging affect is due to an equal force being applied to every single atomic element that creates the individual, slowing each particle down at an equal rate, causing an ageless affect. your cells will not decay as fast if everything slows down, similar to being frozen but since they are still moving very slowly unlike being frozen it is theorized that the subject may still be alive and suffer from side affects of such speeds. To simulate this affect a study in frequencies was put into affect trying to recreate the conditions of light speed on the particles of the human test subjects bodies were put through unlivable frequency tests, resulting in many subjects deaths and becoming brain dead. I cannot source this information as it was told to me from my grandfather who had served in the army for a majority of his life. I always took it with a grain of salt assuming that he was just trying to spook me, i had always asked him about aliens and the gov. type questions so he always peaked my interest, whether it was true or not i still listened.

File: 13043797_10153416697681447_331948574115658709_n.jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

>>17654856

...soooooo that right stick-end phasing through the fence like that...we're just okay with it or?

File: 1460473321072.jpg (48KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 640x640px

>>17654495
Literal autism

>>17655915
>>17654974
Or the end of that stick is hidden by the horizontal plank?

File: fedorathinker.jpg (49KB, 557x711px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 557x711px

>>17654495

>autistic shill trying to come brag about how smart he is

>>>/reddit/

File: image.jpg (44KB, 604x340px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 604x340px

>>17654525
Dumb motherfucker, by your answer I can tell all you did was read the title. Gtfo

>>17654495
>numerical symbolism is useless
>implying recurring numbers and algorithms being expressed in space via geometry and in time via music and tone prolifically is useless and any inherent beauty or aesthetic pleasure we find in certain shapes or music and color is useless
>implying you aren't an autistic child with a need to look down on others you judge as stupid or imbeciles

Stay stupid, stay unaware, and stay out of /x/.

>>17654398
>Could someone explain why it's important?
Geometry is the foundation of the Universe.

Zero gravity = Flat "Minkowski" Spacetime = Euclidean Geometry.

Nonzero Gravity = Curved Spacetime = Noneuclidean geometry.

The Planck Length/Time/Mass/Energy = The Resolution Limit for the Universe (smallest possible pixel in the simulation).

File: 1462223005560.jpg (29KB, 279x304px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 279x304px

>>17656635
>>17656058
>>17655968
Nicely samefagged

File: asdasdasdasdasdasdasd.jpg (49KB, 600x553px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 600x553px

>>17654614
you're wrong, and so was Laplace.

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle crits you for 10k.
you die.

> get yourself a basic education fuckwit.

File: weak_measurement.png (42KB, 866x188px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 866x188px

>>17656712
>Heisenberg's uncertainty

http://www.kurzweilai.net/physicists-solve-uncertainty-about-uncertainty-principle

So noob.

>>17655915
Didn't see it before.

I'm confused.

File: 1461606594582.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

>>17656700
Wrong again autist

>>17654398
It help keeps track of our posts.

>>17656803
What do you mean by this?

File: 1442120549370.png (145KB, 540x355px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 540x355px

>>17655915
Possibly CGI bridge. If you look it kind of looks computerized.

>>17657365
Sorry, dumb response. I jut watched the actual video of it and yeah it's real. Besides 5spoopy7me theory, maybe it's just the angle?

File: 111132118 .jpg (32KB, 429x562px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 429x562px

>>17654447