What is evidence? Is human testimony evidence? What happens if that's all you have?
Case in point pic related: Operation Sea-Spray https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea-Spray
This is an example of the U.S. government conducting biological weapons testing on the citizens of San Francisco without their knowledge or consent.
What happens when you have knowledge about programs, or events, that have a significant impact on society, but you are up against an organization with practically unlimited funds, like our government, and all you have is witness testimony?
Do you simply discount it entirely because they have no "proof", despite the history of fucked up shit our government has done and or funded?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States
embedhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq344ks1ieg/embed
I wouldn't doubt anybody with witness testimony. There are so many instances of human experimentation in the US where official documentation hasn't come out until 20-30 years after the fact. There are SO many examples of "state schools" for the mentally retarded routinely conducting experiments on their patients. I feel like it is less prevalent now, but it was certainly a widespread and verifiable phenomenon.
>>17506728
I always think back to this specific case. I always remember that the government has crossed the line before, and they'll probably do it again.
>>17509346
People forget that we are social creatures, and while we are indeed designed to lie to benefit ourselves, the majority of us are also wired to tell the truth when there is something that potentially threatens the group as a whole.
>>17506728
Niggers aren't human.
A false flag on American soil to justify a foreign invasion? The CIA would never have a hand in such things.