Neutral Beings

>>17206989
Good question! I've never heard of one and my mind is drawing a void looking for one. Muslim here, so I can't speak for Christianity or that other cuck bullshit that spawned it, but there isn't one in Islam that I know of offhand.

>>17207041
Doesn't Islam have djinns?

>>17207056
Yeah, but they don't have the explicit option of being neutral. They're basically forced to put up with the same bullshit decision that man is put to. There are Muslim Jinn and shayateen jinn and it's never supplied to us that a neutral position can exist.

If you ask any Muslim, they'll tell you Jinn are whisperers or shayateen or Shaytan himself or any of a number of malicious interpretations. If Allah meant Jinn to be neutral, he fucking failed.

>>17206989
Considering taht there are 3 planes of existance that many know of, specifically, Hell Earth and Heaven

Hell being the plane of evil and Heaven being the plane of good.

One can assume that the middle ground is the residence of the neutral beings. Specifically Humans.

Humans Are the neutral entities. While not as poweful as Angels or Demons, We can choose what to align ourselves with and hold a power over other beings that they themselves cannot wield.

>>17207185
>and hold a power over other beings that they themselves cannot wield.
I like that one. Not enough to agree with the faith or seek anything but its utter annihilation, but I like that idea.

the talking snakes in genesis. of course we only saw an evil one, but what if there is a whole race of talking snakes and other talking animals? >mindblown

>>17207185
you're not going far enough.
humans are more powerfal than any entity.
they are a race with a trusted peace with the universe itself.

I'd assume humans and animals. If angels and demons are entities of their respective planes, then that means that we're the entities of ours, right?

Is called budism

>>17207381
>their respective planes
Their what now? Isn't heaven supposed to come to Earth at some point? Has there ever been a reason to believe in separate worlds?

Some spiritual religions acknowledge neutral spirits who are just passing by or tricksters. as for something strictly abrahamic, I doubt it. They are very black-and-white.

>>17207393
You know what I mean, anon. Heaven, Hell and Earth. And apparently that theory was alreafy discussed earlier on in the thread but I was too dumb to read it.

>>17207041
>Muslim here, so I can't speak for Christianity or that other cuck bullshit that spawned it
Islam is just as bad. Go suicide bomb yourself, you filthy, pedophile worshiping sandnigger. Preferable with no one else around, unless they are also mudslime goat fuckers like yourself.

Fuck Allah, and fuck Muhammad (pork be upon him)

>>17206989
Chaotic Neutral or Lawful Neutral?

>>17206989

IIIII'm not entirely sure you can say that the Angels are the "good" side of things. I mean, I'm not satanist, but the angels scare me a lot more than demons. Aside from Satan himself (and he was an angel originally), you don't even get much information about demons.

Remember that every discussion with an angel (with the exception of Gabriel appearing to Mary) always begins with "Do not be afraid." Because Angels are fucking terrifying looking abominations.

At best, you can say that Angels are aligned with creation and demons are aligned with destruction. Of course, it's the angels who are supposedly going to eventually destroy everything. Soooo...

Order vs Chaos perhaps? This seems to be the most accurate description. Angels prefer law and rules and demons prefer that we humans do as we wish (from an animalistic perspective). So, I suppose to answer the question you have to ask, "What doesn't give a fuck about what humans do or what rules they follow?"

And, I have no answer to that. Most things spoken of in any Abrahamic texts are specifically spoken of because of their impact on humanity. If it exists but isn't affecting us, it's likely no one has written about it. It's also likely that it's something beyond our comprehension. If it was something simple, it would probably care about us more.

15'I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot; I wish that you were cold or hot. 16'So because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of My mouth.

◄ Revelation 3:16 ►

The answer is no. Everyone is either becoming (doing good or evil and get rewards) or being (enlightenment, which is good). There is no stationary non-evil and non-good.

>>17207421
People who says things are neither good nor evil do not understand good nor evil and are probably evil.

File: rain.jpg (55KB, 640x301px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 640x301px

Hey /x/
I want to spookyfy my life as much as possible.

Can you give your collective opinions of the best books regarding these subjects?

>Novels
>Bizarre Occultism
>Isolated Areas
>Computers and Websites
>Horrible Mutations
>And anything else you can think of

>Also Books General.

>>17208459
lol who the FUCK are you

>>17208120
You don't get out much do you?

Religions are inherently Manichaean, I would be surprised if it was the case.

>>17208459
>doesn't know how to start a new thread
>replies in one with new topic

Stop drinking boy

File: 10305035_856761157684770_2879160855764337138_n.jpg (107KB, 960x744px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 960x744px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brWKmlmvlic spittin n rippin on ya

>>17207391
buddhsm*