Decoding

>>51009
First, you don't 'decode' a hash, it's a one way process, like going through a trapdoor.

Second, that string isn't base 64, it's a hex string.

Third, even if it was, in that screenshot you're trying to decode the answer and not the initial string.

This might be a lot easier if you explain why you're trying to do this in the first place.

>>51027
come on, i'm not even OP and i could follow this. did you even try?

he apparently already bruteforced the hash.

>02354330d49689b877ae91ea9438602ee5e6d3996ed23ebbe1611a6268496070
is the SHA256 hash of
>[[0,1,0,0,1],[0,0,0,1,1],[1,0,0,1,1],[1,0,0,0,0],[0,0,0,1,1]] IiUEGgnm0DKBvlKG

where he tries to go from here is still a bit murky to me, but assuming that
>IiUEGgnm0DKBvlKG
is base64 is not completely outlandish. i mean, it's clearly wrong, but it could have been. the charset matches at least.

File: image.jpg (20KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 300x300px

>>51027
>IiUEGgnm0DKBvlKG
>Second, that string isn't base 64, it's a hex string.

>>51030
If you’re so smart, what’s the character set?

>>51046
ASCII, but i fail to see the relevance...

>>51047
I’m not even OP, I have no idea what the relevance is.

>>51047
Oh, wait, 128-bit hash. I’m an idiot. onlinehashcrack says it’s one of the below:
- MD5
- NTLM
- MD4
- LM
- RAdmin v2.x
- Haval-128
- MD2
- RipeMD-128
- Tiger-128
- Snefru-128
- MD5(HMAC)
- MD4(HMAC)
- Haval-128(HMAC)
- RipeMD-128(HMAC)
- Tiger-128(HMAC)
- Snefru-128(HMAC)
- MD2(HMAC)
- MD5(ZipMonster)
- MD5(HMAC(Wordpress))
- Skein-256(128)
- Skein-512(128)

Oh, and here’s the hex if anyone wants it:

4969 5545 4767 6e6d 3044 4b42 766c 4b47
4969554547676e6d30444b42766c4b47