Any materials anons out there? Can anyone tell me why carbon nanotubes are still not in mainstream use in composites as load bearing reinforcement? F-35 has a few parts where they are included, but those parts don't carry any particular structural loads.
Did nanotubes fail? There was so much hype about them some years ago.
>>380662
they're hard to make
>>380670
Could you elaborate? I don't want any detailed industrial manufacturing secrets.
I mean I don't get it. I just bought a roll of IM9 3K carbon fiber with epoxy sizing for my fishing rod making hobby. IM10 would have been available too as 6K. I have been looking at news about carbon nanotubes ever since I first heard about them like 20 years ago, but they haven't yet shown up as a product. I'd just like to know why is that so.
>>380674
its just not cost effective at the moment, far to small a scale to be able to mass produce them effectively which drives up cost and all that.
I believe it is mainly because of the size of the part and not the actual material it is, everything just needs to be insanely precise
>>380885
You are not telling anything about it. I would pay 50 grand and more for a useful roll for my fishing rods. I simply want the best stuff there is for my thing and the cost is the least of the matters. But it isn't simply happening.
>>380662
They are extremely expensive to make and at the moment, next to impossible to make a significant amount of it flawlessly, one atom out of place and the whole tube becomes brittle and only has a fraction of its proper strength. I think the longest tube anyone has been able to make so far is a few metres and that is in a laboratory. It will be decades before you will see any sort of large-scale production involving carbon tube or sheets, and even then it will likely only be in high-end products like electronic chips never mind your fishing rods.