Tech Support

>>338716

There's probably a shit ton of fluff and crap blocking the radiator. You need to strip it and clear the cooling system.

>>338716
replace the thermal paste on the heat sync

File: index.jpg (8KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 300x300px

>>338716

>>338895
This and seriously nothing else. Your computer is full of fine dust.

Don't use your construction compressor for nail guns, those will spew oil with the airflow. Don't blow in it either, your spit is acidic.

Use pic related. It's dried air with no contaminants. Buy a three pack. You won't be sorry.

>>338902
It's not dried air, it's almost pure fluroethane.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with blowing on a radiator; it gives no fucks. If your breath could corrode copper, aluminium or stainless steel, the entire world would be falling apart as all the cars, screws, locks, and cock rings all fell apart in front of our eyes.

What OP does need to do (which you didn't tell him) is jam a cocktail stick in the fan to stop it moving, because if he blows it like a party whistle, no matter what gas he uses to do it, he'll fuck the bearing.

>>338918
>It's not dried air, it's almost pure fluroethane.

Absolutely bogus. What a hell you are shilling here?

>If your breath could corrode copper, aluminium or stainless steel, the entire world would be falling apart as all the cars, screws, locks, and cock rings all fell apart in front of our eyes.

Except in the case of fucking fine electronics where the assembly distances are so small that you can short the circuits just by introducing a little droplet of electrolytic fluid connecting them, i.e. a droplet of spit. Come on.

>What OP does need to do (which you didn't tell him) is
to tell you to off yourself.

>>338923
>Absolutely bogus. What a hell you are shilling here?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=is+canned+air+fluroethane

Aside from anything else, it should have been obvious because "canned air" is flammable, and last time I checked, real air isn't flammable.

Now we've established that you were wrong about that, and that you didn't even bother to check, what reason do we have to trust anything else you wrote?

>>338925
>because "canned air" is flammable,

Canned air for dusting microelectronics is definitely non-flammable. It's an engineered product for a purpose. See:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=non+flammable+air+duster&t=h_&iax=1&ia=images&iai=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emedco.com%2Fmedia%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Ffalcon-disposable-non-flammable-compressed-air-duster-da0054-lg.jpg

You even understood the "acidic spit" part wrong, like it was about some long-term corrosion.

How much of a fucking dud are you?

>>338932
Here's your "non flammable" duster's MSDS.

It's still not "dried air with no contaminants", it's just a slightly different fluroethane that isn't flammable.

http://www.falconsafety.com/wp-content/uploads/Dust-OffRSpecialApplicationCompressedGasDuster-May2015.pdf

Posting bullshit and hoping no-one will check it isn't going to work here.

File: OP thanks you for your contribution.jpg (122KB, 1291x709px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1291x709px

gg