More photos like this? I'm trying to make a case for eugenics

dude, who needs a lecture about eugenism, everyone know it's a dead idea. On paper it's cool but when you try to do it people will just decide that this or that kind of person (indians, muslims, jew, french,.. w/e) is sick of a mental illness and there's why it's a stupid idea to make it real

>>333952
Not true at all. China has been running a successful eugenics program.

>>333952
Incentive based eugenics is extremely possible and viable. However I think in the case of the picture above, it could be considered recklessly irresponsible or even criminally negligent to allow a genetic disaster to breed as much as she desires, creating all kind of deformed fuckups. They should be sterilized young to avoid any future problems.

>>333975
I'm paying for them; who the fuck is the government to say how many fuckups I get to have?

Fucking socialist.

>>333977
You're admitting you're literally retarded?

>>333979
More that your worldview is logically inconsistent.

Socialism:
- government has a right to tell you what to do
- government also has a duty to take care of your flipper-babies and treat everyone as if they're equal

Libertarianism:
- no duty to treat mongoloids as if they're equal
- but government has no right to interfere with private citizens retard production

Sheeeeeit, whichever way you slice it you done fucked up.

>>333988
Incentive based eugenics, with no forceful application. Label it whatever you want, but the human race needs it

>>333995
Incentivisation is, per se, use of force:

Incentive payment: we're using force on other people to fund it
Soft benefit: as above, but we the government decide what you spend it on
Tax break: roundabout way of saying "we'll use force if you don't"

>>333928
Why would use images of conditions that are epigenetic 99% of the time, to defend eugenics?

That line of thinking is the argument those against eugenics use, against the past retards who wanted to use eugenics against retards. They didn't understand that Downs was largely epigenetic, and most of those with Downs can't breed anyways. Even those few who can have shit fertility rates, and should they manage to have kids, give birth to kids without their condition more often than not. So eugenics doesn't help.

Besides, CRISPR's on the table now - eugenics is old hat.