C programming help

Paypal me $10 and I will help you.

>>301135
[email protected]

Paypal me $10 and I will let you help me \(*_*)/

Functions set up like this:

>One to get the input for the numbers
>void getNums(int * pArray){}
or if the number if ints isn't always 10, return the number of ints.
>int getNums(int * pArray){//return number of ints input}

>one to take the average of those numbers added together
>int aveNums(int * pArray){//return average}
or for a variable amount of numbers
>int aveNums(int * pArray, numOfNums){//return average}

>and one to print out the results.
>void printNums(int * pArray){}
or for a variable amount of numbers
>void aveNums(int * pArray, numOfNums){}

>how to get the code from each function to work together to run the program.
in main():
>getNums(pArray);
>int average = (pArray);
>printNums(pArray);
or if variable number of ints,
>int numOfInts = getNums(pArray);
>int average = aveNums(pArray, numOfInts);
>printNums(pArray, numOfInts);

optional for variable length array:
Instead of returning and using numOfInts for a variable length of ints, you could initialize the array to nulls then iterate through the ints until null is found.

>>301151
>or if the number if ints isn't always 10, return the number of ints.
You're not going to be doing that: void means "doesn't return anything".

>>301169
Try reading the very next line in that post.
>int getNums(int * pArray){//return number of ints input}

>>301177
You're still being a retard, because all that's doing is generating extra object code, and duplicating source code. Copy/paste code is a classic place for weird bugs to hide in, and a function that behaves differently depending on what you do with its return value is the kind of thing you'd see in the Malicious C Contest.

C doesn't care if you ignore the return value, and doesn't care if you don't assign it to anything. You don't need a void version of an int function, and shouldn't use it unless the function genuinely never returns anything.

Adding a void version of an existing function is a horrifying misuse of polymorphism.

>>301195
>Adding a void version of an existing function
>existing function
Where did you get that?
>or
one or the other depending on how anon was using it

>you're doing it wrong
>doesn't offer solutions

>>301208
>doesn't offer solutions
As I said, always return an int and let the caller decide whether or not to ignore it.

Providing an additional function that returns a void just in case the caller doesn't use the return value is asinine.

>>301208

OP: I need the code to function the way it does in the picture. I am using it to finish an example for my intro programming class.

is this what you want?
>https://pastebin.com/8TrxRV4t


also, MODS code tag pwease

>>301324
Yes thanks you so much :D