Monitors

>>231502
Anything below 768p is a meme
Our eyes can't see below that

>>231503
My phone is more than that, and I can sure as shit tell the difference between my phone and a TV.

Perhaps you'd be more comfortable somewhere else? The Eighties, for example?

>>231508
That's called placebo.
Enjoy getting jewd by hardware companies.

Might be better to get a tv senpai. Playing console games on a monitor sucks because all the jaggies. Not to mention the audio is arse (headphones connected to monitor). With a tv, it might look better and you cant see all the impetfections that you can see on an expensive isp monitor.

>>231502
>27-32 inches
>1080p
Must be a console fag... oh wait

Just get a TV.

>>231502
Why would you want a 1080p screen that fucking big? It will look like shit.

>>231509
No, you're just blind.

What you're saying is that no-one can tell the difference between a phone and a Nintendo DS.

Which is absolute shite, as you can count the pixels on a DS.

>>231844
PC screens look like shit anyway. To look halfway-decent, that 30" screen would need to be 5000p, or "9k" to use the modern weaselly terminology.

The only PC that comes close to what mobiles and tablets have been doing just fine for more than half a decade is the Surface Studio, and it's only 21".

Blame Microsoft for being unable to migrate to a new GDI that can handle high-DPI, and blame Nvidia/ATI for being unable (until this year) to fab a chip in anything even resembling a modern process technology.