Powerline TP-Link

>>223325
Unless you're running VLANs (you're not), or manually tagging packets in your firewalls or clients (you're not) you don't need to worry about it.

>>223364
Thx anon!

I'll try to find the MB loss on another place then.

>>223570
An obvious place to start would be your network card and network cable.

80 megabit is low for gigabit Ethernet, but entirely reasonable for 100megabit Ethernet.

A quality NIC with jumbo frame offloading (say a nice PCIe one by Intel) is going to talk to your powerline adapter a lot faster than a cheapo one by realtek or killer.

File: TPL1.png (66KB, 665x483px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 665x483px

>>223613
I've a Z170-A Motherboard, that includes:

LAN: " Intel® I219V, 1 x Gigabit LAN Controller(s), Dual interconnect between the Integrated Media Access Controller (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY)
Gigabit Intel® LAN Connection- 802.3az Energy Efficient Ethernet (EEE) appliance
ASUS Turbo LAN Utility
ASUS LAN Guard"

(copypasted from web description of the Motherboard)

Should I buy a NIC instead of using the one that my Motherboard includes?

IMG related, the one with 200+ MB is conected to the router, and the other one with "N/A" is the one conected to the PC.

>>223825
>>223825
>Should I buy a NIC instead of using the one that my Motherboard includes?
No. Unusually, your motherboard has a very good NIC already on it.

Asus Turbo LAN looks dodgy to me, but that could just be prejudice.

What are you getting 80Mbps to? Your router? Other PCs on the other side of the powerline?

>>223829
From one of the "powerlines". I've one conected to router, and another one conected to PC, I was conected via wifi, but only had 10-20 MB/s and can't even see the signal of 5G ( my walls must be painted with 10-15 lead layers )

>>223846
Just did another test, again 80 MB/s download speed on PC ( 100+ at upload ).