BF1 CPU problems

>>217519
>I have a gtx 1070 8gig RAM
You have more system RAM than just 8GB, right?

> I am starting to regret buying this CPU and GPU.
Certainly, you didn't futureproof very well given that games are designed for consoles, and all the consoles (current and nextish-gen) have twice as many execution contexts* as your processor, and the same number of execution contexts as an i7.


* read that as "cores" if you're not pedantic.

>>217528
WTH dude. Thats trolling par exellence. My i5-6600k stomps all the consoles even put together into the ground. Same goes for my gpu

>>217531
It's not about relative performance vs consoles, it's about performance vs other PCs that aren't bottlenecked by having half as many cores as the games are all written for.

All AAA games are written for consoles first, because that's where the market share and money is. Soz. Consoles have eight cores, so modern games have eight threads.

You have four cores. Four is half as much as eight. You have half as many cores as the games are written for. The number of cores the games expect is twice as many as you have. Each of your cores has to run two threads.

Your processor is literally half the processor the game was developed on. Modern games are only going to get more threaded and processor-dependent. If you wanted a processor that wouldn't be a massive bottleneck in a year or so, you should have got an i7.

>>217533
An I7 is too expensive though besides that, its usually not about threads and shit. Im not very well with these things but there are so many more important things