Reaction webms

File: 1487435348613.webm (4MB, 300x200px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 300x200px

OP and his thread

here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InxN1TihL-o

>>1550410
He really should of won. Beyond everyone else running for president, he actually gave a fuck. Who else would stand up and deliver a speech to a completely empty house, other than a man who was passionate about what he was doing, and genuinely cared about other people?

>>1555759
>of

>>1555759
Here's the truth: no matter how good of a person he is, he would not have the backing of the majority party in congress, nor even the minority because the minority rejects him as being a party-changer. He lost the DNC candidacy because the party rejected him, remember? This is will be hard to swallow, but he would have been worse than Hillary as president. He would have been not only deadlocked by the Republican majority in passing legislation but by his own party. He would have not been able to change anything, and would've fallen into the same trap that Obama was stuck in for 8 years. Hillary would have at least the Democratic minority behind her.

Under Bernie, we would have wasted at least 4 of what's arguably the most important 4 years of or nation's history, where our entire nation is heavily divided and needs a strong, central voice of reason with the power to make change. I know that as a Bernie supporter, you don't like Trump. But Trump wanted a lot of that same reform, especially economically that Bernie wanted, and Trump has the backing of the majority party in all of congress. Trump can make a lot of changes very quickly. Whether or not you agree with those changes is irrelevant. You and I both agree that Washington needed to be shaken up. Trump and Bernie both advocated for that, but only one of them actually had the power to actually shake it up.

>>1555827
yeah bernie would definitely have had less support and not more than Trump in picking his cabinet. alt facts