Star Trek (film series) only!

>>1425134
lololol

File: Star Trek 6.webm (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>1425135

>>1425134

Bump. Need more webms from The Wrath of Khan.

>>1425137
I love it when you can see the stunt performers' faces.

>>1425143
damnit this isn't a feels thread

>>1425155

SO this is how women feel when you shove it in their face.

>>1425155
>>1425161
>>1425174
Get this heresy the fuck outta here

>>1444220
>>1425143
It's legit, man. Makes my lip quiver a bit. He's losing his brother.

Beyond is the only good reboot trek we've gotten so far

File: birdofpreydecloaksmusic.webm (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

Music, maestro

>>1425137
check those deck numbers, some one wasn't paying much attention when editing

>>1425143
fuck you anon

>>1448174
yes!!! someone else who hates the new bullshit.

File: Cqmf725.gif (40KB, 295x293px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 295x293px

>>1425155
>>1425161
>>1425174
>>1428646
>>1467520
>>1474918
>>1479396
>>1483942
>>1494761
>>1527380
>>1541010
>>1547046
>>1554304

H E R E S Y

>>1425134
Someone edited it a klingon control panel to say NO SMOKING while some klingon dude is puffing a cig, Klingon Doc Brown is shouting and there's subtitles saying PUT IT OOOOUTT!!

and then the ship explodes.

Can't find it anywhere.

>>1425155
Heresy, but cute fangs.

>>1428643
>>1554366
This, Someone edited a cig into his hand I guess.

>>1448174
fuck off, flipdick. "Beyond" was fine.

>>1554384
Anything that director touches is shit.

Abrams has/had control over two of the biggest sci-fi IPs ever, and he ruined both.

Why one person was allowed to do that is beyond me. Life doesn't make any sense any more.

File: Star Trek Beyond warp.webm (4MB, 1280x534px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1280x534px

Beyond's story wasn't up to par but goddamn it was visually sexy

File: Star Trek Beyond yorktown.webm (4MB, 960x400px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 960x400px

>>1555007
not to mention this trillion-polygon snowglobe in space

>>1554450
Abrams didn't direct "Beyond" though
>>1555007
>>1555017
Well, the story was.. shall we say "simple". It was a "can't really go wrong"-sort of script and that's fine with me. the movie had its weaknesses – another comic book-style villain for one – no doubt about that either. And yet it managed to right the wrongs of its predecessors in more than one regard.
First and foremost it finally got the characters right! Spock's not trying to beat someone to death and the one scene in which he gets emotional (AGAIN) is handled in a way not unlike it would've been handled in TOS, Kirk finally stops acting like a frat boy, Scotty is a tad more subdued etc.
Secondly, the film, as you've pointed out, looks neat. Also from a "purist's" point of view it looked quite a bit more Trek-like than the two previous movies; for example the Enterprise's bridge, for as little as it was in the movie, finally looked less like an Apple store but somewhat more functional and subdued. And the Franklin's interior looked pretty much as a ship of the post-ENT/pre-TOS era should look like.
Well and then there was also Jaylah – a new character done right if you aske me. Neither Kirk's "love interest of the week", nortoo much of "muh stronk womyn" (except for her introductory scene maybe, but it was still pretty much justified. She was basically a survivalist after all.)