Planes

File: tu-154 control failure.webm (384KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 640x360px

Last one

>>1195931
hellova landing!

>>1195903
Oh cool I saw that plane take off recently at the Camarillo Airport in California. It was doing its inspection flight to see if they can allow civilians to ride in it so hopefully I'll get this view in person one day

File: Saunders Air Lift Division.webm (4MB, 840x472px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 840x472px

>>1195859
>>1195864
>>1195866
>>1195868

File: PBJ-1J first takeoff flyover.webm (4MB, 426x240px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 426x240px

>>1196953
hello fellow venturacountyfriend

>>1197118
cancelled by fucking labour

>>1195931

look i told you the sanctions would bring them down

>>1197736
Not a flyby, the bomber was executing a missed approach.

>>1198116
>Flies by
>"Not a flyby"

>>1198729
Eh I get what he's saying, "flyby" is mainly used for an intentional low pass over people and since the bomber's gears were down it was probably an aborted landing.

>>1195935
Alot of Allied pow's have been killed by raf raids on prisoner trains.

>>1198736
You can also tell he hits the power as he's coming in.

>>1195906
I'll never forget seeing the SR-71 breaking the sound barrier out at Edwards back in the 90's. They did it at iirc 80,000 ft doing mach 3. It had smoke going off and on so you could see where it was at and I shit you not, it looked like a goddamn falling star it was going so fast.

>>1195853
Those flames tho

>>1197246
The lady in beginning gives me the chills, that was tragic

>>1198116
fuck off idiot

>>1195864
Those Bs really growl.

File: B-29 Doc First Flight.webm (3MB, 427x240px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 427x240px

in relatively recent news

>>1202494

I'd like to hear the entire CVR for that flight.

File: VulcanWaddington.webm (3MB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1024x576px

>>1197736

File: A-10 Warthogs fly by.webm (4MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 480x360px

The C-5 videos don't really give you a proper idea of just how massive they are.

>>1202345
kek

>>1204023
Kermie Cam! Man I hope we get some uploads from the Martin Mars.

>>1202494
"We're gonna be in the Hudson"
Well that was sudden

>>1202494
Props to the pilot landing it so safely
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozZoBntX0O0

>>1202494

Does anyone have more like this? I know the ones where they crash and die are a bit morbid but either way I like hearing them go back and forth on the radio where there's a superimposed CGI plane or the path or whatever.

Or should I start a new thread since this one is about enjoying the planes?

>>1195859
>You'll never crawl out of the top hatch of a C-5 at altitude to fight off Russian boarders.

>>1196984
>Chinese cartoons
>C5 Galaxy
What.

>>1195880

Why is he buzzing a residential neighborhood?

>>1204787
This show is very good imo,

http://www.dailymotion.com/AirDisasters

It dissects lots of catastrophic crashes, determining what went wrong, and also shows incidents in which pilots were able to save the plane with quick thinking and good training.

>>1205179
for fun

>>1196261
>making my way downtown

File: BA038 Heathrow crash atc a.webm (4MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 320x240px

>>1204787
No CGI in this webm but good to listen to.

Also watch AIr Crash Investigations

File: Saunders Air Lift Division 2.webm (3MB, 840x472px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 840x472px

>>1204997
the Americans are flying it

>>1205394
I don't know if the two nukes were too much, or not enough.

>>1197246
so sad :(

>>1202494
>land on this runway
>going into the hudson
>want to land at alternate airport?
>going into the hudson
>which runway you want?
>going into the hudson
>land on this runway, its 7 miles away
>I think he said he is going into the hudson
>wut?

>>1195878
I love how the camera's framerate makes it look like the propellers are barely even spinning.

>>1198976
>breaking the sound barrier
>>1198976
>did it at iirc 80,000 ft doing mach 3
>Mach 3
>Breaking the sound barrier
Uh... anon... if it was already going mach 3....

File: Bubbleship.webm (3MB, 640x266px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x266px

And now, for something completely different.

>>1219125
I heard the movie wasn't any good, but, I admit, that looks pretty damn cool.

>>1219832

Criminally underrated movie. Fuck the naysayers.

The producers actually built a full-scale working (but not flying) bubbleship prop.

>>1219832
If you only watch it for the eye candy it's not a bad movie, just know the plot isn't the strong part.

File: paper plane.webm (3MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 320x240px

>>1219961

>>1198770
and a lot of POW's die to USAF pilots too

>>1219832
The movie looks and sounds good, check it out, see if you like it.

File: RG Approach.webm (4MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 640x360px

>>1204787
I had to make an emergency landing a couple of years ago and can share the ATC recording of that if you want. No video though.

I live right next to a base that has these fucking jets constantly flying 24/7 god damn is it loud when I am trying to fucking sleep.

>>1222801
>>1222803
what planes are those?

>>1227312
Front is a sabre, Left wingman is a F-16, right wingman is a f-35 and tail is a F-22.

>>1227312
Second Webm: Front no ideia, i don't care for rotor airplanes. Left wingman: F-22, Right Wingman: F-15, Tail: A-10

>>1227461
Looks like a P-51, and that is one of the more known murican airframes

>>1195853
Albion park airport.

>>1227312
F-86, F-16, F-22, F-35

File: p51.webm (1MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x360px

Does anyone know some good airplane/aviation documentaries?

>>1214455
Little known fact: In hangars some of the installed lights have a different frequency than other lights.
This is to prevent people from having this exact phenomenon happening and walking into rotating propellers.

>>1222785
Well, dont buy a house next to a base then.

>>1228925
Wouldn't they be able to hear if the engine was on though?

>>1232132
Yes ofcourse, but people are stupid.
It actually happened a few times before.

File: hawkerhunter.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x360px

>>1228896
Wings of Russia is pretty neat if you don't mind the weird English dub
Age of Aerospace by Boeing is also pretty good

Anyone know if there is a video or photo of all the nations' most iconic bombers from WWII flying in formation?

>>1195868
i would buy this as an mp3 and listen to it regularly

>>1205449

You're trying way too hard to trigger.
Almost laughably bad.

>>1202494
What a fucking boss

>>1234717
Was that a P51? Dear lord if there weren't a small number of them already...

>>1235263
I'm trying to respond to what you said, but I can't understand what you were implying. Try that again in English and we'll take it from there.

>>1235280
Yes, yes it is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Reno_Air_Races_crash

>>1219832
I don't know who you heard that from, Oblivion is awesome.

>>1235284
Not the same guy.

>>1228896
Jetstream - Canadian doco on trainee fighter pilots. It's a few years old now, but it's a very good series - https://youtu.be/96DhFQQFzZ8

this thread is nowhere near bump or image limit.

>>1219856
Story was shit, but god damn the visuals were great

>>1236156
fucking hell the tu-160s are huge

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3nJNE8jbUg

>>1240318
>Had my volume up
Well there goes my ears

>>1197736
RIP eardrums

File: Saab Draken afterburner takeoff.webm (2MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x360px

Ok I got a free night and haven't been on /wsg/ in a while. I'll make some new aircraft webms

>>1202494
When Canadians strike.

File: U-2 takeoff.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

Ok gonna post some that I made a little while ago. Can't seem to find many good ones to make webms out of

File: F-35A takeoff (audio focus).webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x360px

Here's an F-35A from RIAT. Video isn't great, but the audio is spectacular

>>1243052
Neat

>>1204787

i really like this channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kKm3_YCHf4

>>1235620

The thing that really irritates me the most about 9/11 (aside from the obvious bullshit) is that two of the world's most popular buildings (and by that I mean WTC and the Pentagon as the two entities) - both of them practically under constant surveillance 24/7 by multiple cameras of all kinds not to mention those from tourists or whoever else - went through these incidents and to this day we basically still only have this one clip of the first plane hitting the WTC North tower and that shitty clip from the shitty webcam security camera at the Pentagon as proof.

Sorry, but there's just something wrong about that. The Pentagon has like 250 fucking cameras around it 24/7 watching the facility and the property and area around it, and the WTC towers as noted being so popular had news cameras from multiple TV stations on it 24/7 as well because it was the jewel of the NYC skyline for morning weather information backgrounds.

There's no fucking reason we don't have more footage of these events, unless one steps back to think "Ok, there really is a conspiracy going on someplace here..."

Think about it.

File: November City flyby.webm (3MB, 720x405px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x405px

>>1245115
Pretty sure that 99% of any surveillance on a building will have the cameras pointed at the streets where people actually are rather than up at the towers themselves.

After the first plane a LOT of places around the city started pointing their CCTV at the towers, which is why there's a vast amount of footage of the second place attack:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoE8Uz2ia3M

The Pentagon has no excuse though, there's def some footage being held back there.

>>1245054
Cool

>>1198081
Underated

>>1243129
How does it land on two wheels?

>>1246185
Look at the wingtips.

>>1246231
they fall off at 0:05

>>1244979
Nice

>>1195901
that looked cgi when it was up close

>>1246144
lol

>>1236156
love it

>>1243139
When can we get more Sci-Fi looking planes
this is the closest we have gotten

>>1246185
They land on the two wheels. They correct for crosswind, float, stall it about a foot off of the runway and roll down the pavement until it stops. It has skid plates on the wingtips, so the wings just droop over while ground crew place the temporary gear (pogos) under the wing after it has come to a halt.

I'll make a webm here, gimme a few

File: U-2 Landing From Chase Car.webm (4MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 640x360px

>>1246185
Ok here is the webm of them landing. This is shot from the chase car, which is driven by another U-2 pilot. His job is to call out the height of the aircraft above the runway. Ideally, the pilot will stall the aircraft no more than 1 foot off the ground. Once the aircraft lands, the pilot will continue to apply corrective inputs for wind drift. The U-2 is a notoriously difficult plane to land, and it will not stop flying until it is stationary

File: Tu-22M3 Backfire Low Pass.webm (2MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x360px

>>1246614
I think the Tu-22M3 Backfire is a pretty good runner up

Does anyone have footage of the Pogo talking off or landing?

>>1248586
The Pogo? Be more specific

File: Cessna 404 Titan gear up landing (inside).webm (3MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x360px

Hydraulic failure resulting in a gear up landing. I cringe at the sound

>>1195928
funny thing is i probably built that plane

>>1248647
pleasure to meet you, mr boeing

>>1204997
This movie has high school girls being shot at with a Mörser Karl.

>>1196984
Anime was a mistake

>>1248587
It was a vertical take off and landing plane that stood pointing straight up. It resembled a dart with three tine wheels, one on each rear fin and a large prop in the rear and front (possibly two in the rear, stacked).

>>1204766
That is fucking beautiful.

>>1222805

HURRRRRRR I are a AEROPLEEEEN

>>1241343
Everything the B-1 should of been, really.

>>1218908
Well, you know, you can't just break the sound barrier once. You gotta slow down at some point.

>>1251842
Did he die?

>>1248552
They aren't really stalling it m8, just flying it onto the runway. You can see the spoilers on the upper wing retract before he rounds out.

>>1195920
What part of work-safe don't you understand?

>>1251894
The U-2 is different. Because it has such a large wingspan, it will float like nobody's business. It must be brought to a full stall in the flare

>>1200990
Oh fuck is that the abandoned B-29 some folks found and fixed up? Wonderful.

>>1251919
Well if you watch the video, he retracts the spoilers before rounding out, then engages them again to descend onto the runway. It's similar to landing a glider in most respects. Spoilers will reduce the lift which will change your glide angle but it's not really a stall.

>>1251926
I know, I've flown both planes and gliders. Look right before he lands, at the 1-1/2 foot call out. The aircraft suddenly loses lift at a positive angle of attack, which is shown by the tail wheel touching first. This happens when the wing stalls completely. The ground effect is so pronounced with such a high aspect ratio wing that in order for a controlled landing you need to stall the wing completely. If you do not, any amount of crosswind can cause you to ground loop the plane (the U-2 is prone to ground looping).

>>1204198
>>1204023
Guess I've got another youtube channel to watch.

>>1244945
ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOBEAR

>>1236075

I remember this series, shame most of it was faked.

>>1219961
:^)

File: image.gif (897KB, 800x430px) Image search: [Google]

897KB, 800x430px

>>1245115
Ah yes, 2001, the unparalleled peak of portable cameras being cheap, common carried by most, able to be quickly turned on, and with superb audio/video quality to be used as news footage.
You fucking moron.
Did you forget what 15 years ago was like for cell phones? Most, at least a lot, didn't have cameras, and if they did they were shitty, and couldn't be accessed with going to the home screen and activating it. Not to mention that recording things with your phone hadn't become as big as it is now, because you'd only be able to share it locally, no YouTube. And the memory for phones was shit, 100-200 pictures with a minute or two of video? You'd be taking up most of your phone memory. There's a reason there wasn't hundreds of angles, most people aren't filming randomly at 8:45 in the fucking morning, they're at work, traffic, school, or they'd likely not have money for a fancy newfangled camera phone. Most cameras aren't installed to watch the skyline, it's for surveillance of property/streets. Same with the pentagon. Who would be recording? Why would a surveillance camera be facing AT the building, not FROM the building. And any camera that could see the plane hit likely got destroyed by it, or didn't see the impact very well. Plus the footage is technically military property, and the news would need time to get that footage at all, let alone with proper legal channels. The news popularized the best easiest to get footage, what ever else there was fell between the cracks of the chaos that followed and the distractions of war and such that followed the chaos.
Not everything is some grandiose plot, anon. And there are less self-destructive and complicated ways to start a war that'd work just fine. Shit we could've pushed saddams buttons, then used the wmd excuse/info to go in and end the awful regime, and BOOM, foothold to start more war.
No 9/11 /required/.
You dipshit, I bet you think flat-earthers are on to something too.
>dat 2000 character limit

File: image.gif (3MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x360px

>>1254816
No I focused on phones because they're common now, but video cameras were slow to start too, you couldn't whip it out and start filming in under 5 seconds, it had to boot up a little. Like the other anon said, most footage is of the second hit because of many reasons like this. Don't forget they were fucking expensive at the time, well for the time at least. And it was a luxury item. So the tiny fraction of people who brought their expensive luxury item onto the STREETS OF FUCKING NEW YORK got footage of hit number two. One guy was filming a gas inspection and got lucky enough to catch it on tape. The few other videos saw the same thing, but his had reactions and shit that the news eats up. Pentagon footage would be hard to come by, the military is like pack rats with footage, even innocuous shit is thrown in a box and forgotten. Hell, high definition reels of the first moon landing went missing and only a year or two ago were any of them found. And where were they? In a fucking box in a mess of storage. The military/nasa/broadcasters all failed to store it responsibly or lost track. That's the fucking MOON LANDING. 9/11 is no where near as important to human history and legacy, no offense but that's a big fucking milestone, so what chance does what little pentagon surveillance that caught a decent angle have of being properly filed and given priority right after a major attack on US soil? Not fuckin much. There's no footage of the plane that crashed in a field, is that proof of a cover up too?
Fucking truthers, I swear.
Next you'll tell me congress/the White House/government is cohesive enough to properly plan something so massive with out a single person blowing the whistle before hand. Edward Snowden was ballsy enough to expose the fucking NSA, and they were just snooping people's search habits and contact data. You think someone wouldn't come forward to expose a government plot to kill 2900 innocent American people to justify war?

>>1251863
Yes, he did.

>>1196953
>>1197441
boy this is a small world isn't it

>>1198770
Eternal anglos don't care

>>1197736

I was lucky enough to see one of these take off a few years back. fuck me if the noise wasn't the stuff of nightmares.

>>1195868

okay, why the hell is that thing making that noise?

>>1249360
only dropping 2 nukes was a mistake

>>1246144
kek, sounds just like my car

>>1195923
Ebin!!

>>1243052
>aeronauticalgapeporn.webm

>>1219125
I could actually see a craft like that working. If you get past the engine stability , weight distribution, and fuel storage, it's quite a basic concept. The tail 'rotor' is redundant though, unless it's used specifically for yaw.

>>1195931

GOAT Landing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xfh9-ogUgSQ

>>1245115
You're right, there's gotta be a conspiracy there. The big evil government must have gone and stolen all the security camera tapes in new york and all the cameras that were recording the towers at the time, except the two clips we have. I bet there were loads of security cameras too, because pointing your security camera at the WTC skyline is a really great way to deter criminals.

That's a way better theory than maybe there just wasn't many cameras recording the towers at that exact couple of seconds and it's actually pretty impressive that we have two decent video clips.

>>1259498
whats the most horrifying thing is that there was tens of survivor but all dead except 4 during night, thanks to japan army who neglected them and rejected U.S. army's approach..

>>1205179
Its a base.....

>>1221440
Go home Brit fag. Butthurt on 4chan?!

>>1195853
super connie's ARE THE TITS

File: sketchy short final.webm (4MB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 600x400px

genuine OC

>>1260430
That's a completely inappropriate glideslope. That approach was way to shallow and was only to show off.

>>1260448
obviously. It's not me flying so i don't care. Thing is, that's how all the people who fly out of there come in. Never figured out why.

>>1260456
Until one of them drills into a house.

>>1195864
Almost a fucking tail strike.

>>1260456
Cause weekend warriors never care about improving their flying skills and technique. I've noticed a terrible "that'll do" or "that's good enough" attitude among them. Very dangerous

>>1245189
>hey kid

>>1248647
You didn't build it, you helped make it come true.

>>1205391
>that calm and professional manner

>>1260562
>>1260647

Yeah I've noticed that too. But most of them are in their mid 60s and have been flying forever. Plus, all those houses they get near, right there at the end of the runway, are the actual pilots' houses that fly out of that airstrip. So they're really just flying over their own house. In this video, the dude was showing me how close people come in sometimes, and showing me that terribly placed cell phone tower that the company snuck in without checking for airplane traffic. The other landings he did the glide slope was way steeper, but those videos were much more boring lol.

File: Antonov An-22 (2) Takeoff.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

These engines are spectacular

>>1204997
>chinese cartoon
>
>it's poke-MOOOOOOOOOOOOON

>>1232132
Hanger has two planes:
Plane 1 has its engine revved up, making tons of noise.
Plane 2 has its engine idled, and happens to be at the exact frequency as the lights.

>>1259498
>IT'S... THE END
Holy shit

File: oh the humanity.webm (4MB, 852x480px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 852x480px

Trigger warning: Heavy traumatizing footage.

>>1262628
>>1232132
>>1228925
This is why beacons exist.

>>1244979
Fuck man...

>>1262854
did they dieded

>>1246185
barely
It is considered one of the hardest planes to land

>>1262854
Reported
Spoiler such images next time.

>>1263780

nah. everyone was okay. airship's cabin got severely damaged but nobody was seriously injured.

>>1262854
RIP thicclander

>>1260430
>short final
>does pretty much a fucking IFR approach

>>1246185
>>1248552
Why did they design it like that?

>>1251934
>I've flown both planes

hahhaha..AHHAHAHAAh

>>1259513
is that a Viggen?

>>1267259
Congratulations, you have the reading comprehension of a first grader.

File: fuck physics 2.webm (343KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 640x360px

>>1267935

File: fuck physics 3.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>1267936

>>1266622
Fewer wheels means less weight/more room for fuel or equipment
>>1267259
C172S, DA-42NG, and SGS 2-33