Looking for more science related wallpapers. I have a few, but

File: 56370987-sun-wallpapers.jpg (880KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

880KB, 1920x1080px

>>6967296
>>6967301
Thank you

File: Electrons.jpg (597KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 1920x1080px

>>6967325
I have a poster of that over my desk.

File: Formulas.jpg (463KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 1920x1080px

>>6967902

File: Planets.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>6967903

File: Solar_System.jpg (304KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1920x1080px

>>6967904

File: Spectrum.jpg (303KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 1920x1080px

>>6967906

File: 1334522007773.jpg (462KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

462KB, 1920x1200px

>>6967301
>left and right bhrain
>science

yeah nah

>>6967853
I have a poster of this in my room, got it way back

>>6967765
WHERE THE FUCK IS FUCKING PLUTO

>>6967234
Catalent

File: Red Mandelbrot.jpg (217KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1920x1080px

Is math acceptable as well?

>>6967959
pluto's not a planet anymore

>>6970399
Pluto is a planet. It's just a small planet. There's nothing else out there, so we may as well call it a planet, leave it on the Solar system charts, and spend more energy trying to get there instead of arguing about it. De-planeting Pluto was all a Clever Plan by astronomers to get people interested in the already-mapped Solar system again, but it seems to have attracted people who just want to be contrary and Flat Earth idiots instead.

>>6970505
>There's nothing else out there
Why are you even in this thread?

>>6970505
I agree. Pluto and Eris are both planets that have a very eccentric elliptical orbital path due to their distance from the sun. They might as well be considered planets but "muh planet cant take 557 years just to get around the sun, muh planet cant be rocky after the gas giants, muh planet cant be tiny, muh gravitational dominance, hurrrr." The classification of a planet being more than a round (or pretty close to round) object with the sun (or some other star) being the center of its orbit was the best definition before the "clearing the orbit through gravitational dominance" bullshit came into play. My reasoning for this is because there's still a possibility in a few hundred or thousand million years in the future, pluto and Eris could possibly "clear the orbit" since they both have a strong enough gravitational pull to be the orbital center of a body (both have at least one moon) and both have the necessary qualifications for the original definition of a planet.

Saged for unrelated.
or something. idk if I get banned for admitting a sage on this chan or not

>>6967908
badass

>>6967903
This is actually quite useful, thanks.

>>6967325
Had this poster in my room as a kid

>>6967842
>mecca.jpg

File: uranus_rings.jpg (1017KB, 4100x4260px) Image search: [Google]

1017KB, 4100x4260px

>>6967275
assumption: 50 < Re(avg. object diameter) < 300

File: wallhaven-478447.jpg (110KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1920x1080px

>>6967301
>>6967935

Just one of those things that's ingrained in everyday expressions. Needs to die

page 10 bump

File: 1491858893715.png (280KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 1920x1080px

>>6979355
and some contribution, Ulam spiral for those interested.

>>6972697
They were perfectly happy with Pluto being a planet until they found out about Eris & co. being out there. They decided to change the def because children can't memorize 10+ planet names.

It's as stupid as changing the definition of "animal" to things domesticated in western society and calling everything else a "wild creature," but what can you do, vote out the IAU members?

>>6967275
photo or painting?