More like this?

File: 1492454069163.jpg (725KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

725KB, 1920x1080px

>>6941756

File: 1492454240412.jpg (3MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2560x1440px

>>6941756

>>6941756
Bumping until I get on my computer to post some, OP.

>>6941851
Thanks

>>6941851
Bump 4 this guy.

File: 1490042960283.jpg (1MB, 2048x1357px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1357px

I might have a couple

I know this one is posted a lot but it fits

File: 1490234912754.jpg (706KB, 2048x1358px) Image search: [Google]

706KB, 2048x1358px

>>6941998

File: 1490469583312.jpg (2MB, 4243x2829px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4243x2829px

>>6942000

File: 1491851716344.jpg (537KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

537KB, 1920x1080px

>>6942002

File: 1490490735699.jpg (2MB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1365px

>>6942004

File: 1493042282713.jpg (4MB, 5760x3840px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5760x3840px

>>6942006

File: 1494310868806.jpg (565KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

565KB, 2048x1365px

>>6942008
Sorry most of mine are cities etc.

File: 1496066732018.jpg (2MB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1152px

>>6942009

File: 1496289400792.jpg (538KB, 2048x1328px) Image search: [Google]

538KB, 2048x1328px

>>6942011

>>6941998
>>6941909
>>6942002
>>6942011
what is the effect called the Photos are edited with? I'd like to search for more of them

>>6942016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-dynamic-range_imaging and a blur maybe?
I could be completly wrong

http://www.dylanfurstphoto.com/adventure-1/

>>6942740
Samefagging to say: as I scroll through these, it turns out half the papes in my main folder are by this same guy. Sure has an eye for lovely places.

File: 1481373720113.jpg (277KB, 600x900px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 600x900px

>>6941756
For your phone, op

>>6942068
I'm guessing low contrast and saturation, also.

>>6942068
I'm also curious about what the actual name of this effect is called but it's not High dynamic range.

HDR just means that the camera is able to capture a higher dynamic range (The whites aren't blown out and the darks don't loose detail.) It's only to preserve detail.

That's not what this effect is called, because there are some photos where the shadows have no detail at all.

File: 1450464405498.jpg (859KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

859KB, 1920x1200px

>>6941756

File: 1448626197910.jpg (330KB, 1170x780px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 1170x780px

>>6944072

File: 1450463941084.jpg (1021KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1021KB, 1920x1200px

>>6944073

File: 1446981971146.jpg (1MB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1600px

>>6944074

File: 1448388905943.jpg (641KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 1280x800px

>>6944076

The name is faded wallpapers.

>>6942068

I don't usually make comments on this site, but the photographer is Dylan Furst, for OP's photo & a lot I see posted here. His shots can't be replicated unless you're in the correct area. Always shot on a cloudy day, which, if you live in Washington like him, pretty easy. He uses lightroom, color "corrects" the green by sliding it to the left, making it more warm. He usually puts teal in the shadows from what I've noticed, and, obviously, curves are important. Just some things to help you guys out. Sorry if this was long-winded.