sonic cd sucks
>>4182905
Levels are too long, way too long. Makes the game feel a little empty. The coloring seems to be little depressive compared to the cart games. Despite sonic cd is way better than sonic 2. If that is what you have been fishing for OP. I will give you that.
>>4182919
i genuinely prefer sonic 2, it's my favorite of the bunch. that said i haven't beaten sonic 3 but it's hardly terrible. you were right on the money about the levels design in cd desu; too long, too empty, and nothing but springs and bouncing ball things all over the place. even the music which everyone says is wonderful isn't really anything to write home about except for a few here and there.
>>4182905
Nice attempt at causing shit OP.
A for effort.
>>4182905
your mom suck too, and yet, we like her.
can you get super sonic in this?
>>4182905
>Filthy Casual Confirmed
Sonic 2>Sonic 3 & Knuckles>Sonic CD>Sonic Advanced 2>Sonic Advanced 1> Sonic 1> Sonic Advanced 3
>>4183215
info.sonicretro.org/Sonic_CD_Plus_Plus
>The coloring seems to be little depressive compared to the cart games.
What? Sonic CD is like Sonic 1 on acid.
If anything Sonic 3 is when the color palette got a bit less psychedelic and more "realistic".
>>4182905
Looks like shit, plays like shit
fuck sonic CD
It shows a lot about the difference Yasuhara's level designing in sonic 2 and 3 made.
sonic cd still has some good charm too it. as long as you don't have a version with abysmal loading times, I'd say it's worth playing.
>>4183306
>Looks like shit
Objectively how?
>plays like shit
Subjectively how?
>sonic cd sucks
'cause the Sega CD sucks.
'cause as a company, Sega sucked.
good games, for the most part.
shitty company.
.
Hey with all the reboots, respawns, rebirths and resurrections going on these days, what the fuck is Sega doing?
>>4183343
same poster
>Hey with all the reboots, respawns, rebirths and resurrections going on these days, what the fuck is Sega doing?
.
actually, nevermind. If they came back, they'd just throw everything into turmoil again what with all the "throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks" method of crapping out hardware and peripherals.
Everyone (Nofriendo especially) should've just watched Sega burn with brilliance and then fade away.
>>4182905
I can agree. Don't get all the praise for it.
Then again, I'm more of a 3D Sonic guy.
>>4182905
Except you're wrong. You want to talk about a Sonic game that sucks? Look no further than Sonic 3D Blast or Sonic 2006.
>>4182905
I like it, but Sonic 1 was better just from level design. So its the worst of the classic Sonics.
>>4183523
>implying Sonic 1 isn't the patrician choice.
>>4183691
people give sonic 1 a lot of shit for its slower levels but i have fun trying to get through marble zone as fast as possible
>>4183723
Also it's not like all the other Sonic games didn't have waiting or slow moments.