Was Willow reviewed in Nintendo Power? Mobygames says Volume 7 reviewed it. I checked archive.org, and Vol 7 is a preview, 8-9 are guides. No review.
Google Books, says that on page 82 of "Nintendo Power, Volumes 237-239", there appears to be some kind of review. No clue why it'd be in such a late issue.
https://archive.org/details/Nintendo_Power_Issue001-Issue127
https://books.google.ca/books?redir_esc=y&id=YYpYAAAAYAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=willow
>>4132927
This is what Google says is on page 82.
>>4132927
the "review" is on page 61 of issue 8.
>>4132980
Yeah, I know that. There's no review score since it's just a preview.
Mobygames says Nintendo power in the Sept issue gave it 4/5. Doing the math, it's 3.75. Maybe they rounded up?
http://www.mobygames.com/game/nes/willow-
In any case, it doesn't line up with the later Nintendo Power review, so it's actually a separate one.
>>4133023
Here's a score.
>>4132927
Now you made me want to watch Willow again.
Forget Tolkien, Harry Pothead and Game of Killing each other, Willow is what it's at.
>>4135876
game of thrones is just a soap opera with a fantasy setting. I cant believe people actually like that crap
>>4135876
>liking Willow
My nigga
>In a 2014 interview with Famitsu, Shinji Mikami noted that when he joined Capcom in 1990, all of those who were accepted into the company got a free copy of the game.[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willow_(NES)
>>4136891
what game do they give now
What pissed me off about this game was the font used, it made passwords a bitch for me at age seven.
>>4132927
>2D top down exploration puzzle action
What the fuck is this keyword list? The genre is called action/adventure. And some games on the list are action/rpgs.
>>4137838
Not as bad as Faxanadu.
>>4138035
>The genre is called action/adventure.
That's pretty vague. It could be 2D, 3D, and "adventure" could mean anything.
>>4136192
I think you mean mah peck
>>4136908DmC: Devil May Cry
>>4138413
Adventure tends to mean exploration and puzzle solving. The "action" part means you also kill shit along the way, whereas a pure adventure game is just your Monkey Islandesque point & clicks.
>>4136184
I can see that, but if soaps has this much war, politics, intrigues, and thrills on top of impending doom, I would be way more into daytime soaps than I am now. I could too, I have no day job. But all I've seen so far is rich white people problems the shows.
So I'll stick with got, tyvm
>>4132927
>nintendo power
>Caring what an official first party promotional/shilling publication thinks about a game.
It's literally an advertising booklet.
>>4132927
why do people not get banned for this autistic spam?
>>4139420
Are you high? This is the exact kind of stuff you should expect to find on a forum about retro gaming.
>>4139610
autistic bullshit like this? lol no.
>>4132927
Did Nintendo Power ever properly "review" anything? They had little mini-reviews I guess, and they gave quality scores sometimes, but I don't remember them ever having full article-length reviews. It wasn't really a review magazine; it was more about previews, tips, secrets, and a little bit of reader community.
>>4132927
Holy shit who unironically says that?
>"Anon do you want to play this fightan?"
>"No I'm too busy playing this 2d Top down exploration puzzle action game right now"
>>4132927
Crystalis is FUCKING great
>>4139630
Everything is autism. Your post is autism.
>>4139367
War and politics are royalty (therefore rich white people) problems.
>>4139780
>every enemy and boss has a level threshold that you must meet or else you deal zero damage
>all the fights are piss-easy once you meet the threshold
Truly a masterpiece.
>>4140212
I didn't even notice that in my playthrough, in fact I need to see some proof. I was too busy having F U N
>>4140216
https://strategywiki.org/wiki/Crystalis/Enemies
https://strategywiki.org/wiki/Crystalis/Bosses
>>4140220
Ok how does it ruin the game, in your opinion?
>>4140224
It's forced grinding. It kills the replay value when you know you'll have to spend time grinding enemies to be able to damage the next boss. I ran into this problem late in the game in my first playthrough when I couldn't damage a boss and spent a dozen times trying to kill him without understanding why I couldn't. It's an awful mechanic and there's no logical reason for it to exist.
>>4140224
JRPG shit in an ARPG game.
>>4140232
Well, I never ran into that problem, I maxed out at some point later on anyway. So it didn't ruin it for me, but then I just got lucky.