Is pic related /vr/, or am I in trouble?

I'm sure it's /vr/ in one way or another. It came out on PCs first on hardware that's retro? Probably doesn't count.

"Honorary retro" is a term I've heard used here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tffX3VljTtI
Here check this out.

>>3955160
It is officially accepted as /vr/, so feel free to talk about DX here.

File: John_Morris.png (172KB, 305x341px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 305x341px

>When you see someone talk about a game released after Dec 31st 1999 AD 23:59:59 PM

okay real talk though is the ps2 port playable at all?

>talking about a 17 year old game

NOT RETRO

>>3955160
you're in trouble BOGEY

File: dx funeral 2.jpg (340KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1920x1200px

It's definitely retro. The game was developed before 2000 and only released in 2000 because of the publishing. We've had plenty of DX threads before no problem.

I recently finished this game for the second time. Still a fantastic game. Took me about 48 hours to complete in leisure completionist style. I remember my first playthrough being like 30 hours.

if a game is set in the future then its not retro

>>3955852
rip doom threads

>>3955209
>video games on platforms launched in 1999 and earlier
excuse me sir but windows 98 was launched before 1999

>>3956079
Nice selective reading, cunt.

STICK WITH THE PROD

To get the thread going and to end the chain of shitposting I would like to offer the following thoughts:

One of the reasons why this succeeded as a game is because the narrative has characters that are apparently mature, for example the quartermaster, a military vet who advises and even punishes excessive use of force, or Jaime Reyes who is just a medical professional who you can talk to in a neutral way.

There's something brilliant about how Deus Ex remembers to include the mundane as well as the dramatic. All other games are 100% drama, so there's no contrast and therefore they invariably come across like a B-movie.