This never shows up in lists of good Jag games for some reason. I still play it to this day. It's both higher resolution and higher color depth than the SNES version. Genesis version too but that goes without saying. CD32 version has the cutscenes but isn't fullscreen.
PS1 and Saturn versions are the most complete, but what else is new. I don't mean to say Jag has the absolute best version but it's quite good, and belongs on any list of good games for the console.
Apples to apples comparison, Sega version:
Jag version:
SNES version:
The water is also much simpler in the 16 bit versions and one layer of parallax background has been removed. Anyway that's all.
>>3879451
Wouldn't the Amiga version be a better comparison?
>>3879520
It was a home computer, so no. The Amiga CD32 was the console equivalent anyway.
>>3879524
Who plays Worms on a console anyway?
>>3879548
Me, motherfucker.
>>3879553
Are you a child whose parents don't allow you to use a computer?
>>3879548
Or Populous.
Or Lemmings.
Or Sim City anything.
Some shit was just made for keyboard and mouse.
>>3879557
It's a good game for the Jaguar though. A GOOD GAME for the JAGUAR.
>>3879564
>It's a good game for the Jaguar though. A GOOD GAME for the JAGUAR.
<< What I hear in my head
>>3879548
I used to play Armageddon on the N64.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlH126WakZs
Anyone else think Bjorn Lynne is underrated?
>>3879451
Towers 2 is a much better Jaguar game nobody knows.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DWvwYH_q2o
>>3880017
Bet you played it alone.
>>3880562
Sure did. Multiplayer's for queers.
>>3880559
>Worms 1 sucks but the sequels which did nothing but add more weapons and gimmicks are classics
What?
>>3883167
Worms 2 vastly improved the physics