What went so right?
>80s/90s Konami
that's what went right
>>3678501
Hiring people who'd found Treasure to work on it.
>>3678501
eh, bloodlines is better
>>3678514
>Treasure
No wonder it was casual trash.
>>3678536
Rondo is best though.
>>3678501
IV is fun, but like many SNES games, it suffers from being easy.
>>3678501
imo they are four types of castlevania games.
You got you classicvania games. Your metroidvania games. Your 3d games.
And then theres Super Castlevania IV
they only one to fit the CasualVania
>>3678501
everything, SCIV is the pinnacle of the series.
I have conflicting emotions.
I DO think IV is the pinnacle of the series, but... I don't want to be that guy, but after watching Sequelitis, I started to think it's dumber down compared to the methodic challenge of the first game.
As Arin said, IV is a great game, but an ungrateful sequel.
>>3678564
Maybe, but I'd take it over shit like death's hallway any day
RoB>CV3>SC4>Bloodlines>CV1>>>>>>>>DX SNES
>>3678882
Does Dracula X even count though?
>>3678757
4 is a remake, the Japanese name is the same as the original Castlevania's
>Uninspired level design
>Embarrassing and pointless mode 7 effects
>Muddy graphics
>Not utilizing the cool multi angle whip enough.
I mean, I think the game is decent but it's kinda of a mediocre castlevania game to me.
>>3678882
X68000 > New Generation > Rondo of Blood > Vampire's Kiss > Super Castlevania Bros
>>3679006
>New Generation
>Vampire's Kiss
Get the fuck outta here
>>3679006
This guy knows what's up.
>>3679714
> Remake
Do you even know what a remake is, bronio onio?
>>3679006
>>3679025
Get yourself a trip so I can filter you
>>3680019
Castlevania chronicles*