Who is better?
>>3596506
>>3596506
OTP
>>3596506
Hudson
>>3596517
>made literelly just 2 good games
Treasure
>>3596541
I can name more. Seriously, which 2 good Hudson game you think of?
>>3596609
Adventure Insland and Bomberman, name the rest.
>>3596506
Rare WAS good before microsoft raped it, but Treasure has many more good titles in their list.
>>3596613
Bloody roar is good
Treasure. Rare doesn't even come close.
>>3596506
Rare went full collectathon.
Treasure never wavered.
Rare started making good games on the NES and stopped making good games after the NES.
Treasure made good games for several generations. Treasure wins.
>>3596506
>muh treasure
I never heard of it before 4chan
Rare on the other hand is a household name
>>3596613
Star Soldier is p fuk'n coo'
>>3596881
>I never heard of it before 4chan
Really? Well, but you are right, they weren't as famous as Rare.
I knew of Treasure before 4chan, but they're definitely lesser known.
>>3596881
>muh ignorance
I do enjoy both companies output even though they both hit a slump after the 32-bit era.
>>3596506
They're not even remotely comparable
>>3597087
Well, they're both video game developers, but yeah I don't know why would OP compare these two, seems kind of random.
Both made good stuff. Overall I prefer Treasure, but Rare did some great stuff as well.
Treasure. Rare was too gimmicky and too western.
>>3597187
>too western
And strangely enough they were the only developers who could do a fighting game that was more like the japanese ones, as opposed to stuff like Mortal kombat or Eternal champions that played very different from the standard Street Fighter formula.
In terms of gameplay anyway, visually KI is indeed very western, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.
>>3597187
Hold up fuckr
U dont get more gimmicky than treasure
>gimmick
?
>>3596881
>never played gunstar heroes before
Seriously?
>>3596506
I love them both. Rare is hokey fun and Treasure is about as Japan weird as it gets.
>>3596879
Pretty much this.
>>3596881
Mc Donalds is a household name as well.
>>3596506
I will go with Rare. Treasure died for me after Silhouette Mirage and Rare's archievements on ZX Spectrum, SNES and N64 are simply amazing. Personally, there's no contest here.
Imo, their last good game was the Sabre Wulf remake on GBA in 2004. Everything went downhill after this.
>>3598141
Yes indeed
>>3596819
They published bloody roar, the developer was Eighting I believe.
>>3596506
Treasure. Is this a joke?
Considering I've only liked two Rare games, but like 3/4 of Treasure's line up, I'm gonna go with Treasure.
>>3596506
Rare. Treasure is mediocre at best.
>>3597187
Define "gimmicky" and "too western".
Treasure, because Rare got cucked by Nintendo, and Nintendo a shit.
>>3599187
You got your facts wrong Aus-kun, Rare got cucked by Microsoft. They actually did well under Nintendo's days, probably their best time.
>Nintendo a shit
no u
>>3599191
Rare was at their peak when they were Ultimate Play the Game, actually.
And we're both right, they got cucked by Nintendo as well as Microsoft.
>>3599203
This nigga knows what's up.
Pre-DKC Rare > Microsoft Rare > Kidtendo Rare
>>3599203
This is not even compared with DK, Banjoo Kazooie, Killer Instinct and many others.
>>3599207
>Microsoft Rare > Kidtendo Rare
Low bait.
>>3599203
I played Jetpac on DK64, on a Nintendo system.
>Console war bullshit
You were supposed to be better than /v/, /vr/.
>>3599207
>Microsoft Rare > Kidtendo Rare
Are you baiting or are a kid?
>>3599231
Then you're underageb& and should gb2/v/.
True /vr/ patricians played it on their Speccy.
Treasure, jesus christ. It's not even a competition. Treasure is still making pretty alright games to this day, and most of their games are at the very least enjoyable. Rare is literally a walking corpse at this point and their best games still aren't quite as excellent as Treasure's.
No one here remember the god-tier games that rare have for SNES and N64? I just see Spectrum everywhere.
>>3599253
>Nintendildos think anything that's not positive toward Nintendo is just bait
Sad!
Both have made great games. I always found Rare stuff to be comfier.
>>3597190
>but that's not necessarily a bad thing.
The CG graphics made the game look pretty ugly. Well, the character designs still are better than in the new KI, where everyone looks like a mess.
>>3597190
Killer Instinct was using the same technology as Mortal Kombat. And had the same flaws Mortal Kombat has. Don't know why you think it plays more like a Japanese fighter and less like MK. Even the inputs were more like MK than SF.
But of course the biggest problem was input lag and highly exploitable combos. Both tied to the graphics.
>this thread
>>3599668
>Don't know why you think it plays more like a Japanese fighter and less like MK
In KI you can block the same way as SF. You can also do dragon punch and other moves in the same way as in SF. MK is compltely different.