This looks kind of interesting. Is it still fun or too dated

>>3486242
What is this a realm for ANTS

>>3486242
Recently finished the trilogy with the same party throught out the games

It is completely playable, but make sure to read the manual

the first game has a lot of missable stuff and points of no return, so look for a spoiler free guide. there's also the possibility you'll never find one of the last items needed to finish the game

the second one has an event based on a timer that the game does not metion and you cannot finish the game without completing it

the third one is really easy if you import a party from the last games

overall the first and second games have a really good simulationist feeling that few crpgs can emulate... ffs you have to buy new boots on the second game since they get damaged during travels, not to mention water food and something like 15 kinds of diseases

>too dated to be enjoyable?
For /vr/?

>>3487018
I feel like a lot of the /vr/ community still has a certain point where they're not willing.

Hell, I like BaK, M&M and Wasteland, as well as a whole bunch of jRPGs and dungeon crawlers, but I still can't stomach Wizardry, for instance.

>>3487501
But is it due to age and not the fact that you're a wimp?
Wasteland alone is older than Wizardry 5+.