>PS1
>Harry Potter
underage
>>3427583
Did your other troll thread about the fake PS1 vs N64 image get deleted? Fuck off to where you came from
>>3427609
who?
Nice graphics thread?
Meanwhile, on Windows...
>>3427583
Lol yuck, but not bad for its last years.
FLIPPENDOUGH
>>3427583
which one of them dies?
>>3427791Fred
>>3427858
Fag.
Kek
> look at this game in a resolution it wasn't intended for
>>3427858
wait thread?
what is even the point of this thread? delete this imo
>>3427858
no
>>3427662
true. the windows game was so beautiful!
>>3427880
oooh we got a retro shill
>making fun of old graphics
>on /vr/
Everyone clap for the faggot janitor. We wouldn't have these high quality threads without their hard work.
>>3427858
CandleJack is coming to to
>>3427858
I am become /v/ destroyer of boards
>>3427858
Haha my mom is already awake for work!
What OP likes the most
>>3427858
Jokes on you, I've got immunity cat.
>>3427858
Dank
>>3427858
Yo
>>3427583
>>3428167
So we're not allowed to discuss graphics anymore?
Not every retro game looks good just because it's retro.
The Harry Potter games are the perfect example of what happens when you try to push a console past it's limits. The graphics engine is complex, the graphics have quality textures and models with many polys, and the game manages to pull some pretty visuals, but almost everything looks wrong and too warped, and the game would look way better with simpler models and a more stylized art, like that Dr Slump game or Megaman Legends. Yes, even on a CRT.
The graphics are too detailed for its own good.
>>3428665
You're fucking the game up hard with brutally inaccurate modern-day emulation (even though there are accurate options available), don't even pretend what you're doing is retro or has anything to do with how the game actually looked. It's not a good looking game naturally, so why do you have to build a ridiculous strawman like this to take it down further?
>>3428682
HLE or not, still looks like crap. Low poly bullshit is what killed nice pixel art back in the 90s because everyone and their dog had to jump on the "hurr, muh 3d" bandwagon and abandon 2d.
>>3428665
Hasnt aged well. Certainly the ps1 of all machines looks the most ugly.
>>3427858
lies
>>3427858
not chancing
>>3427583
Not even a good book.
>>3427858
Boobs
>>3428719
3d sells more so it was inevitably gonna happen
>>3428167
>>3428247
i really like c*ck.
>let's discuss ps1 graphics!
>720p pics
Do not shit on the Harry Potter games. For they are all pretty fucking stellar.
>>3427858
fuck off
>>3429001
And the best thing, none of those are ports, every game is completely different for each platform9 3/4
>>3429001
First harry potter for GBC was legit as fuck. Decent turn-based RPG. Card-collecting side-quest for spells and stuff. Solid
>>3427583
>emulation
>wrong resolution
>not on a CRT
0/10
I'm drunk and literally anything makes me laugh, but OP's faggotry has somehow sobered me. Sick.
>>3427858
fuck you
>>3429001
>GBC is, ironically, the best one.
Fucking crazy.I see you sneaking that movie in there.
>>3428247
But that game is good though.
nintendo shills have invaded this board.
>>3429336
that is true! really lonn process to play through all the games of one game
>>3429381
>drunk alone in front of a pc on an antisocial website pretending to be a fun guy, but actually being autistic af
degenerate
>>3429851
don't be mean, anon. that's like 60% of this board, me included. too close to home.
>>3427858
fuck off
>remember playing and liking the Chamber of Secrets game
>there is that "post-game" stuff where you just wander around the castle with no actual means to heal yourself at all due to potions being a check point thing
>walking around all of Hogwarts to collect extras just 1 hit away from death
Who the fuck thought that was a good idea?
>>3430010
do you mean that dualing chamber?
>>3429620
>>3429336
>>3429848
Same deal, every game different.
This was the same for POA, couple of different versions for GOF, but just ports onwards.
I would have bought an entire series of PS1 games.
>>3427583
>a 5th gen console has terrible graphics compared to modern machines
Who would have thought?
>>3427583
Yes, British people are quite ugly. What's your point?
>tumblr
>>3429851
On a Tuesday no less
>>3430432
The question is why?
>>3427583
loved the two HP games on PSone
graphics are obviously dated, but colorful and somewhat appealing
>>3432859
Probably because it's easier to convince people to buy multiple copies. I had the pc, playstation, and game boy color version of the first game. Pc was best. It was also my first PC game besides a bootleg copy of Wolfenstein 3D the guy who built the computer gave me. I was like 9 and he said, "you're gonna love this shit, play it when your mom's asleep."
>>3434450
same. loved the pc version, also my first pc game
>>3428665
If the UVs and texture work was better, there wouldn't be as much stretching and seams. The artifacts, like in >>3430854, remind me of what happens when a model's run through a polygon reduction tool. Maybe that could be it, who knows.
Though the texture warping is awful, which actually could be because the PS1 was pushed too far. Polygons that, in most PS1 games, are spent minimizing the warping was spent on additional details.
>>3427662
>Rowling did not allow her book franchise to be turned into games with book cover aesthetics so they always had to make games based on Warner Bros. licensing and based on the movies.
fuck, man.
those pseudo photo-realistic looks are shitty looking as fuck.
>>3427662
I always wanted a good magic school game. Only ones I can name are the HP games and Mana Khemia
>>3428247
What game is that?
>>3427583
What the harry potter games on ps1 are pretty fun
>>3440828
Die Hard Trilogy
>>3443156
That sure isn't what I expected it to be but thank your very much.
>>3434145
gameplay is still spot on