Is civilization III /vr/?

No because it's not a pre-2000 game.

>>3237119
learn to sage mang, you've just bumped a 12 hour old non vr thread to the first page

Damn, that color scheme Civ3 is as 2000s as it gets when you compare it to the more watery 90s palette of Civ2.

>>3237119
>No because it's not a pre-2000 game.

I always find this a bit silly, Soldier of Fortune for the PC isn't retro, but the Dreamcast port released a year later is.

>>3237181
http://www.mobygames.com/game/windows/soldier-of-fortune

This game predates XP (unlike Civ3) so I guess it could be allowed.

>>3237181
Really, it's more of a bias against PC games. PC has a hard cutoff date, while consoles get to push the date a couple years or so. IMO, certain PC games very close to the date should get a bit of a pass, particularly if they use stylization or techniques that fell out of favor or were dying around their release.

Diablo 2, Deus Ex, and Civ 3 would all be great games to discuss here, as would C&C TS and RA2. Polite sage for against the rules though.