Is the GBC version any different?

>>2837480
The last boss is different, and in the NES version most enemies are immune to one of the sword types but this was removed in the GBC port.

Is different in that you playing on smaller screen, and music sounds slightly different but still same.
Also instead of big cartridge you have nice compact gbc cartridge, feels good to put in gb cartridges, that's total + to me.
If you lucky you have ac adapter so you play long time all day. Have fun OP gbc is good game.

>>2837480
Yes, the Field Of View is smaller on GBC.... Except that enemies are still the same, leading to bad situations when enemies you haven't sseen yet are already triggered.

Wow. I never even knew this game had a GBC port.

>>2837480

you know instead of cluttering this board with an unnecessary thread, you could have easily found your answer with a simple google search,

>>2837620
I for one am glad this was posted here, for I have a question:
I dropped this game indefinitely because I couldn't beat one of the bosses. Now on the second (or third I forget) fight with the guy who does some kind of Pulverizing Pinball attack by which he Ricochets all around the arena. I remember I found whatever sword type he was weak to fighting him the first time, but it wasn't working this time. I tried all the sword types and they all made a noise like he was immune. This especially pissed me off because there's a boss rush thang going on.
How the hell was I supposed to beat him?

>it's a zelda ripoff thread

>>2837640
In the NES version you couldn't hurt a boss until you were a certain level. Maybe the GBC version is the same?

Its basically same thing a couple tweaks

>>2837640
You're thinking of Mado.

Equipment: Sword of Water + Blizzard Bracelet
Second time you fight him you have to be at least level 14.

>>2837480
Worse story, worse music, worse interface.

The port was made as a DigiPen Class Project.