You only have one chance to catch legendaries
If you kill them they don't come back
The only rational course of action is save scumming
This is compounded in certain other games like Colosseum
Save scumming is poor game design
Therefore, Pokemon games are poorly designed
>>33506695
your face is poorly design faggot
except there are pleanty of games that do give you second chances at legendaries. example: if you fuck up catch deoxysis on oras, beat the ellite four and he'll be waiting for you at the rtop of the tower for a rematch.
and in the case of zekrom and reshiram, it literally won't let you not catch it before of story reasons.
>If you kill them they don't come back
Not since Platinum, dumbfrogposter
>>33506695
>Pokémom games are poorly designed
Yes
>your reason
I guess? There are a LOT of other things that are a bit more important than that at creating an unenjoyable experience...
>>33506714
Wrong
>>33506695
>A game that punishes you for not being good is poorly designed.
I'm seeing a pattern here.
>>33507454
How to see a pattern with one data point? You would not be retard, would?
>>33506714
Go ahead and knock out Entei in HGSS, then tell me whether he comes back after you beat the E4
Spoiler:He doesn't
>>33506714
Stop calling us dumb frogposters
>>33508353
There's more than one datapoint, you failed premature abortion. Want me to spell it out for you? Okay:
- Frogposter
- Is bad at video games
- Acts like a retard
I'm also inferring that he's a retard and that you're one as well. If you're trying to feign intelligence, you're doing a sloppy job of it. I'm just a normal human being.
>>33506695
>You only have one chance to catch legendaries
>If you kill them they don't come back
That hasn't been true in nearly a decade.