is it good somehow?

>>33477271
Can't see the EVs and IVs, so can't tell

>>33477271
That Nature makes it a good Umbreon, without judging the IV's.

File: Magikarp.png (7KB, 240x160px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 240x160px

>>33477271
Than a Magikarp.

File: 62ec64018b340acefe17ce4e23e92366.png (41KB, 617x737px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 617x737px

>>33477283
Shiny Umbreon best shiny eeveelution

>>33477283
But i want to keep it as it is

>>33477296
why?

>>33477316
because all shiny eevelutions look awful

>>33477343
Not Umbreon.

>hey /vp/ is this pokemon good?
>dont say evs
>dont say ivs
>i dont wanna evolve it

No you fucking retard your ingame eevee isnt good

File: carlos.png (138KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 350x350px

>>33477277
I'm pretty sure OP only has one EV.

>>33477344
i don't really like umbreon
and normal type isn't so bad (yea i also asked about moveset)

due to the bold nature you should turn it into one of the defensive eeveelutions (umbreon, sylveon, vaporeon). One problem is that it doesn't have wish, which would be very important on a defensive set. Umbreon still gets moonlight, so that's an option. Umbreon, max health, split defenses, foul play, moonlight, toxic and heal bell/roar/protect.

>>33477462
He's on an emulator and has a -sp atk eevee with a special attack move I doubt this guy knows much about competitive

>>33477469
oh yeah it's impish not bold. so only umbreon. if it's just for story on an emulator he can do whatever. adaptability silk scarf return is pretty cool I guess lol. he already has fire and water, so espeon, umbeon or jolteon but since it's a -sp att nature they are all kinda sucky. eeveelutions also have crappy movepoools in general and need rare tms to even have a decent stab.

>>33477361
Then transfer it to Sun/Moon, give it the Eeveeium Z and make a super good stat passer