You know they want to keep it safe for the first switch game so which one is more likely gen 1 sequal or gen 8 ?
DP remakes obviously
gen 8 with even more gen 1 pandering than before
>>33464485
Gen 1 remakes
>>33464502
>DP remakes
>obviously
I've never seen so much delusion in such a short post
I feel like DP remake are not safe so they wont do it even USUM ports are more likely
>>33464485
The scary thing is that I can see either as feasible outcome. GF could do the safe bet and do another Kanto game but I can also see that being the follow up to an introductory new gen game
>>33464485
it is a sobering reality that we seriously don't know if game freak's going to do kanto re-remakes or not
>>33464485
gen 8
Gen8 followed by gen 1 remakes.
Release dates announced simultaneously.
gen 8 is safest thing they can do. people go nuts over new pokemon. not surpising no remakes ever outsold first set of mainline games
gen 3 had gen 1 remakes, gen 4 had gen 2 remakes, gen 6 had gen 3 remakes, and gen 8 will probably have gen 4 remakes. gen 1 remakes just can't fit, the gap between gen and remake's gen is getting bigger and bigger.
>>33464734
>gen 1 remakes just can't fit
Yes they can sinnohfetus
>>33464485
If anything this is why I still hold out hope there will be a port of US/UM they're just hiding until after Pokkén has had a couple weeks for it's main sales numbers.
Safe and reasonable is precisely what a port would be as the first game.
If it's not a Gen 7 port, it's Gen 8. They aren't going to jump in with a remake of an existing game.
>>33464985
by oversaturating the console with pokemon games. do you want 2 games per year?
>>33465070
Who said they have to release two games per year?
>>33464485
New game set on kanto with gen 1 characters and mostly gen 1 pokemon
>>33464485
Gen 8. You'll have to defeat 8 champions in 8 regions before being able to battle the ultimate 4 and the pokemon king, who is also the evil team leader.
>>33464485
Gen 8, obviously. Brand new region with new mons is the best way to get people to buy the game.
>>33464485
Gen 8 IS Gen 1 remakes.
>>33465092
do you want gen 7 remakes during gen 15?
>>33464485
There was a time that I would hope for a Gen 1 remake/sequel because I skipped FR/LG but until they prove that they aren't going further down the S/M style of 'play for five seconds-cutscene-play for five seconds-cutscene-repeat', I would much rather they move to Gen 8.
As far as how likely, I could really see both happening
Both. Gen 8 set in future Kanto, but due to passage of time that's not obvious until the very end.
>>33465100
awful idea
>>33464502
No.
>>33465223
Yes
Gen 8, although I wouldn't be surprised if they give us another gen 7 game to test the waters first.
>>33466803
If it means diversity in catchable mons, along with new ones, fine. I can live with this. I want to see Kanto change with time.