Realistic Pokémon thread?
>>33453627
>grass shrimp
>realistic
>when this is from the same artist that made shit like bird Gothita and bat Gastly
>>33453657
Bird Gothita was drawn by someone else.
>>33453627
Arvalis id the shad man of /vp/
Just fucking call it Arvalis thread
I hate when they just make them deformed, ugly and scary and say they are "realistic". But boy, this Kyurem is GREAT!
>>33453657
>when this is from the same artist that made shit like bird Gothita
get your facts straight anti-arvalisfag. And there's nothing wrong with the Gengar line he did.
>>33453657
bats confused with ghosts?
wow just like in real life
shocked
>>33454514
i like how they did magmar
OHMUHGERD WEALISTIC POKEMERNS AINT GEWD
>>33454525
Why the fuck are you typing like that you fucking retard.
Drink bleach
>>33453627
>its just animals with pokémon features
>>33454542
>its just pokemon but with different textures
>>33454547
If pokémon were real this is what they would look like.
>>33454542
If pokémon were real this is what they would look like.
>>33454559
But what if reality was Pokemon?
>>33454557
This is the only drawing by Arvalis I consider edgy. He clearly went out of his way to make it gory.
>>33454587
lol he makes shit that shouldn't be a fucking bug into a bug and shit that should be a fucking bug into a dinosaur
>>33454600
Scyther pretty fucking clearly looks like a dinosaur anon. Unless you've seen some new insect species with a dinosaur face and dinosaur claws that no one else knows about.
>>33454623
Have you never seen a real life praying mantis?
Scyther is just animu mantis with blade arms.
>>33454587
>>33454600
The funny part is that he gave it a Dimetrodon face for no fucking reason whatsoever.
>>33454680
>Have you never seen a real life praying mantis?
It's not a praying mantis. It's a scyther.
>>33454655
kek
>>33454655
>its clearly a hedgehog
>makes it a shrimp
>>33454685
What a senseless post.
He clearly asked you if you're unaware of Scyther's likeness to praying mantises, which it is based of on.
>>33454514
>>33454555
>>33454557
>>33454569
>>33454587
>>33454663
>it's another alverisfag shills his beloved overlord thread
How much are you being paid?
>>33454719
>which it is based of on.
I've already said it's also based on a dinosaur. Read before posting please.
>>33454742
That is without doubt it's secondary inspiration though. The point was that it bears a very strong resemblance to real praying mantises, which you refuse to acknowledge.
>>33454655
kekaroo
>>33454689
Hedgehogs don't exist
>>33454542
wtf just like pokemon
>>33454623
post that kaiju pic of scyther and scizor desu
>>33454753
>That is without doubt it's secondary inspiration though
Doesn't matter if your headcanon thinks it's a "secondary inspiration" if its build is clearly a fucking dinosaur. Making it a mantis would barely make it look like Scyther.
>The point was that it bears a very strong resemblance to real praying mantises
Not really. It has aspects from praying mantis but it doesn't have a strong resemblance. Its face looks nothing like a mantis and it lacks antennae. Its legs look nothing like a mantis. It has four limbs rather than two. Making it a dinosaur with mantis features is a better reinterpretation than just making it a mantis.
>>33454833
>It has four limbs rather than six*
>>33454663
Gyarados looks like something from my nightmares
>>33454663
JC;HH
>>33454833
>Doesn't matter if your headcanon thinks it's a "secondary inspiration"
>Bug/Flying and literally called the mantis pokémon
>not a mantis first and foremost
You have to be shitposting.
>Not really. It has aspects from praying mantis but it doesn't have a strong resemblance
It absolutely has. Everyone who know what a mantis is should recognize that Scyther is based on one right away. The face and feet are the only thing that aren't particularly mantis-like. And mind you the rest of the legs and body is clearly insectoid in structure, and many Bug-pokémon has more humanoid faces than their real life counterparts.
>Making it a mantis would barely make it look like Scyther.
>mantis features is a better reinterpretation than just making it a mantis.
Nobody has said you can't make it a mantis with dino features here but you.
>>33454898
Dont even bother with him. Shill-kun literally believes that Alveris can do no wrong and all his designs are perfect. Unironically believing realistic Pokemon should just animals with Pokemon features, instead of Pokemon with realistic features.
>>33454936
To be honest I don't actually mind Arvalis, people are free to interpret pokémon how they wish. I was just annoyed by the other anon posting nonsense like "Scyther isn't a mantis, it is Scyther" and saying any realistic portrait of Scyther using a mantis as the basis wouldn't work.
>>33454559
Most of pokémon have body structures that would never let them walk or do any meaningful motion IRL
>>33454753
"Recognizable" is not quite the same thing as "a strong resemblance." Alveris' drawing sucks, but I agree with that anon that Scyther is only superficially mantis-like.
>>33454898
>>not a mantis first and foremost
It's a Scyther first and foremost. Slowbro being a hermit crab Pokemon and having a hermit crab shell doesn't mean turning it into a hermit crab would be a good interpretation.
> Everyone who know what a mantis is should recognize that Scyther is based on one right away
based on something != looks like something. It's also based on a dinosaur.
>The face isn't particularly mantis-like
You mean the most important part of the Pokemon?
> and many Bug-pokémon has more humanoid faces than their real life counterparts
Not really. And Scyther's face is reptilian, not humanoid.
>Nobody has said you can't make it a mantis with dino features here but you.
Probably because I'm apparently the only one here who isn't a retard.
>>33454985
>"Scyther isn't a mantis, it is Scyther" and saying any realistic portrait of Scyther using a mantis as the basis wouldn't work.
All of these statements are true.
>>33454555
>turn every dragon pokemon into a appropriately giant lizard
>BUT GIRATINA who is a centipede for some reason
Why does everyone get their panties in a knot over this guy? It seems his objective is to use real world animals as a basis for Pokemon designs, which leads to some interesting and unconventional solutions. He also seems to be the only artist doing this, while most other artists who make realistic Pokemon simply just make a highly detailed/rendered version of the Pokemon.
>>33455019
>It's a Scyther first and foremost.
I don't know why you keep bringing this up. It is an inane statement. We're discussing if it draws more inspiration from a mantis or a dinosaur.
>based on something != looks like something. It's also based on a dinosaur.
True, but it clearly has strong mantis elements.
>You mean the most important part of the Pokemon?
See my next point.
>Not really. And Scyther's face is reptilian, not humanoid.
My point was that many Bug pokémon get faces that are more recognizable to us and are able to convey human emotions. Volbeat, Illumise, Burmy, Karrablast, Escavalier, Scyther, Scizor, Shuckle, Combee, Swadloon, Leavanny, Ribombee, Pheromosa, Armaldo and Dewpider all have faces that doesn't look arthropodian at all. Not to mention a shit ton of them have regular vertebrate eyes.
>Probably because I'm apparently the only one here who isn't a retard.
Now this is why you're such an massive cocksucker, because you state that any other interpretation than Arvalis' is wrong.
>>33455164
Although Alveris has some creative and neat designs, the problem people have with his designs are that they barely resemble the Pokemon their based off of. Sometimes.
>>33455129
STOP
>>33455222
>It is an inane statement
No it's not. It's a Scyther. It's not an animal. The best interpretation is one where it still resembles the Pokemon.
>True, but it clearly has strong mantis elements.
It clearly has strong dinosaur elements.
>Volbeat, Illumise, Burmy, Karrablast, Escavalier, Scyther, Scizor, Shuckle, Combee, Swadloon, Leavanny, Ribombee, Pheromosa, Armaldo and Dewpider
almost all of these still have insectoid features such as antennae. Scyther's face is based on reptiles. It looks absolutely nothing like an insect.
>because you state that any other interpretation than Arvalis' is wrong
Because they are wrong. Scyther's build is closer to that of a dinosaur than an insect.
>>33455257
>>33455113
>>33455113
>>33454663
I feel like these people have never seen a carp in their life.
>>33455502
I like this one, that's an interesting interpretation of togepi with real life eggs
>>33455457
>The best interpretation is one where it still resembles the Pokemon.
Rich coming from someone defending Arvalis. Who often take great liberties in warping the designs.
>almost all of these still have insectoid features such as antennae.
Wrong, shit like Karrablast has no insectoid features in its face.
Anyway I'm done. You seem hellbent on thinking no other interpretation than Arvalis' is valid. Just so you know it this kind of mindset is why people get turned off, even if the art itself is good.
oh baby
Realistic Pokemon are terrible. Stop.
>>33455481
this is so ugly and cute at the same time
>>33455534
>Who often take great liberties in warping the designs.
To make them look like the Pokemon. A mantis wouldn't look like Scyther.
>Wrong, shit like Karrablast has no insectoid features in its face.
It has no visible nose and it has a fucking rhinoceros beetle horn sitting on it. It's not subtle at all.
>>33455574
Come on anon, even you can see that what Mime Jr. most closely resembles is a human child, no matter what its inspiration is, yet it was made into a tadpole. The pokémon's eyes, mouth, the head in general, the arms and legs are not what they're actually supposed to be on the pokémon. This is not a case of picking the "best interpretation that still resembles the pokémon", it is a case of picking the interpretation he finds most interesting and going with it.
>It has no visible nose and it has a fucking rhinoceros beetle horn sitting on it. It's not subtle at all.
I explicitly said face, that part has no insectoid features whatsoever. But fine have a final (You).
>>33455623
what the fuck am i looking at... i can't even tell what kind of animal he used to make this nightmare-ish creature
>>33455623
>yet it was made into a tadpole
And yet it still looks like Mime Jr. He made it into a frog to emulate Mr Mime's hat and fingertips. So it still is the best possible interpretation.
>I explicitly said face
The horn is a part of its face.
>>33455590
I know that people will hate on this because Nosepass is supposed to look like a moai, but i'd love this to be an actual, real animal.
>>33455623
That is fucking terrifying
>>33455590
>>33455660
>a living statue
>make it a bird
Literally why
>>33455669
Because a statue isn't an organic living creature.
Try using your brain for 2 seconds and stop being an autist.
>>33454681
For the reason that Scyther has a reptile face, the only one that counts.
>>33455623
Son?
>>33455659
>And yet it still looks like Mime Jr. He made it into a frog to emulate Mr Mime's hat and fingertips. So it still is the best possible interpretation.
He just painted Mr. mime into a toadpole's back, i can fucking paint my hand and put googly eyes into it to make it look like a bird, but that won't make it a good interpretation for a fucking bird
>>33455703
The only Pokemon that actually seems likely to be real.
>>33455674
>Every Pokemon had to be an animal
This is why arvalis's designs fail. Not every Pokemon needs to be based of an animal. Some Pokemon are robots, sculpture, and plants but that doesn't mean there not realistic. But for some reason dragons are?
>>33455717
>THICCC
>>33455685
Not sure if it went over your head but Dimetrodon isn't a reptile, it is a proto-mammal.
>>33455964
Not same anon, but could you catch me up on proto-mammals?
>>33455787
SUCH CUTENESS
>>33455987
Proto-animals, or synapsids ruled the world during the late Permian, then got fucked up during the largest extinction known and the dinos took over afterwards.
Name comes from mammals stemming from the group, but obviously most of the members aren't direct ancestors to mammals.
Previously they were called mammal-like reptiles, but this was changed because they aren't reptiles at all.
The coolest synapsids were gorgonopsids, this is an objective fact.
This is leololtrio
>>33456077
>The coolest synapsids were gorgonopsids, this is an objective fact.
not lovely Moschops? shit taste anon
>>33456077
>gorgonopsids
Aaaan, now I found the newest site to browse while at work.
dinopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Gorgonopsia
Anywhere else I can find cool info on dinos and ancient life forms of Earth?
>>33454810
not at all. Pokémon are based on animals, not actually animals
>>33456077
So are they mammals or reptiles? I feel so stupid not knowing this
>>33456144
Technically neither.
Mammals are a part of the group, but far from all synapsids are mammals.
They aren't related to reptiles at all.
Think of it this way, the things that turned into mammals, along with mammals and their closest relatives are synapsids.
>>33456194
Oooohhh. I see now. Thanks, anon
>>33454557
This is a good one. He should do one where there are two pokemon having sex.
>>33455129
Scary
>>33455526
Stupid as shit.
>>33456403
>>33456417
>>33456435
>>33456453
What's wrong with his faace
>>33453627
>ITT: ugly shitty fan arts that claims to be "realistic" instead of "grotesque"
>>33456477
Why does he make them look so demonic?
>>33456498
That seems to be his shtick.
>>33455491
Blastoise. Cause it looks like my pet turtle and i want to scrape those barnacles.
>>33456477
>that conkeldurr
what the fuck man
>>33456482
>WAAAAH IT'S NOT REALISTIC UNLESS IT'S CUTE
Fuck off.
>>33456520
>>33455750
>Not every Pokemon needs to be based of an animal.
They have to if he's going for realism. Pokemon are still living creatures at the end of the day. A statue or a sword having muscle and brain function is even less realistic.
>>33455129
>>33454514
>Slugma and Magcargo are a slug and snail respectively.
>make them into cephalopods
>>33456526
Shit like >>33456453 is in no way realistic though. It is gory for the sake of being gory. Any animal that has protrusions coming out of it skin actually has the skin heal eventually, it doesn't look like a bloody mess.
>>33456584
It's a ghost.
>>33453627
>Piloswine looks good
>Raikou looked okay until I realized it wasn't a Liepard
>Kyurem is a plucked lobster handed chicken with rockspikes
>>33456650
There is nothing realistic about the drawing.
As I said real shit wouldn't behave that way.
But more importantly, it is still cartoony as fuck.
>>33456544
>>33456653
Just like real Kyurem then.
>>33455054
At least giratina is supposed to look bizarres and alien
>>33456685
That looks gay as shit
>>33456544
There's a right way and a wrong way to turn a Pokemon like Aegislash into a bug. Arvalis went with the wrong way.
i wouldn't hate arvalis' designs so much if his head wasn't so far up his own ass
>>33453627
I like this artist
>>33456685
tfw those chicks are better than torchic
>>33455490
Clever
>>33456765
I only have his weather trio saved
>>33456738
I like these.
>>33456765
>>33456794
Kyogre is my favorite one out of the three
>>33456815
>a gorilla goat
>>33456808
Here's a super realistic Keyogree
>>33456801
Weirdly cute Mew
>>33456847
what the fuck am i looking at here?
exeggutor vs goatse man?
>>33456825
>>33456841
Someone else posted one of their works,nice.I know some of them might not be great but for some reason i like the style.
>>33455593
>>33455744
>>33455760
I like realistic bird pokemon,I'd love to raise the Braviary
>>33456882
I think that's a Hitmonlee.
>>33456958
This style is mostly just recolored actual birds but i love it
>>33456815
Literally Satan
>>33456841
Yvetal and Arceus by this guy when?
>>33456983
Some of those aren't bad,Snorlax being a big dog like thing can work.Look at these cute fuckers.
>>33456983
>>33457025
I thought snorlax was explicitly more bear-like
>>33455727
>>33456973
it kinda makes sense. thinking about Baphomet in SMT games especially.
>>33453627
The smuggest
>>33457035
Bears are caniforms
>>33456866
kaiogir
>>33457107
yeah but that's clearly the face of a bulldog
>>33453627
Kyurem's wings could've been bigger, but this is one of arvalis's better realistic mons.
>>33457152
>>33454663
>Relicanth is completely unchanged
kek
>>33457191
>>33457191
Crabominable?
>>33457200
Yeah
>>33457152
If you're trying to ask if I'd still fuck it, the answer is yes. Probably even more now.
>>33457153
I could've sworn bears get faces like that depending on species/weight
>>33456738
Are those supposed to be the right way? They barely even fucking look like the pokemon they're based on.
>realistic pokemon
>it's some edgy shit
Every fucking time
>>33457215
Well the alternative is this (top left).
>>33457215
The "Classic" Honedge is the interpretation that looks the most like Honedge of any realistic depiction I have seen of it yet. Mainly because it actually is a fucking sword.
>>33456526
>WAAAH IT'S NOT REALISTIC UNLESS IT'S UGLY
>>33455750
are you autistic or stupid by any chance?
>>33455669
Statues aren't real, anon.
An artist's WIP of a realistic Shiinotic.
>>33457324
it would make more sense as an amphibiam
>>33457248
>Mainly because it actually is a fucking sword.
But it's nor a sword.
>>33456983
treecko is fucking perfection
I think there's fine line to walk between coloring an animal and calling it a pokemon and literally interpreting a pokemon's weirder qualities with some more realistic textures, like the primarina that was posted itt earlier. The artist behind this torterra falls into the former category.
>>33457394
how come?
>>33455744
>steelix is a Secretary bird
>>33457240
>trevenant is an octopus
Fucking why
>>33457478
Because ghosts aren't realistic. :^)
>>33457478
Do you see trees that move in real life?
>>33456983
I would pet that snorlax
>>33457472
>Steelix
>>33457419
It's a bug possessing a regular sword.
Honedge is literally stated to be a spirit possessing a regular sword.
I don't see the problem.
>>33457492
yes
>>33457486
This is a joke and not something someone is proud of right?
>>33457492
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eavo08IXduQ
>>33456109
Literally wikipedia
>>33457486
>>33454555
That Crobat is pretty bitchin though.
>>33457472
Skarmory?
>>33457472
>Steelix
No,that's Skarmory
>>33456520
even worse its a female too
Doggos
>>33455252
This is the first good one posted.
>>33456785
*stupid
>>33457649
> R E A L I S T I C
>>33456544
No it doesn't. If a Pokemon is a clay statue, then Theres no reason to change it into an animal because clay statues exist in real life. Not all Pokemon are organic creatures, making them into animals doesn't make them realistic all of a sudden, especially if they are already based on things that are realistic like statues.
>b-but statues don't move!
and dragons don't exist. But aravils is completely ok with Dragons, but can't do with something that exists like a sword.
>>33457914
But dragons move, though
>>33457939
They can't move, because they don't exist. The entire notion that Arvalis is "realistic" is patently absurd anyway, because his interpretations can still do shit like wield psychic powers. His Mr. Mime is a "realistic" frog, sure, but it's a frog that can erect fucking mental barriers.
>>33456391
Is that what happens when Chandelure and Drifloon fuck?
>>33456417
Oh god it looks like that live action Scrappy-Doo
>>33456738
I love this,even if the idea of it actually being a bug and not just a sword is weird.I think it'd be neat if Honedge line had those different swords for other regions.Gamefreak never do it tho.Also Master Sword Aegislash would be sweet but obviously not as a "Shiny".
This Deoxys looks pretty cool
>>33458182
>>33457240
>Ninetales and Vulpix are wolves
Fucking triggered
>>33453627
Someone post Realistic Jigglypuff. You know the one. I know one of you fags have it.
>>33457914
>Not all Pokemon are organic creatures,
But they're still living creatures. So to be realistic they have to be translated into organic creatures so they can function as a living organism.
>>33458340
How would you make a "realistic" Porygon under those criteria?
>>33458395
BUG OR CRAB
>>33458395
Porygon is the exception, it's supposed to be made of code, you can easily turn it into a duck or something, though
>>33458479
Actually I read the post you responded to, yeah, you don't need to turn clay shit or ghosts into real creatures, but I don't understand why these /vp/ autists get triggered by Arvalis, I think its fun what he does to some of the more inorganic mons
>>33458395
like this
>>33458283
>>33458523
>>33456653
Yeah, it's a big improvement on the real kyurem.
>>33458479
And Klinklang?
>>33453627
terrible pic op
>>33455490
lol
I don't want to fuck any of these.
>>33458589
Another point in their favor. Game Freak should adopt grimdank as the official style moving forward, clearly.
>>33457240
Disgusting
>>33457846
Literally my neighbor's dog
>>33457856
First-draft concept art. Utter shit
.>>33457878
>Look mommy! I made a .gif!
>>33458182
>generic_alien.jpg
>>33458193
>generic alien on crack
>>33458566
>honey on the wing for no fucking reason
>>33458589
Me either
>>33458610
lmao tl;dr
>>33456821
did some one say gorilla horse?
>>33458618
Why aren't they birds?
Isn't that what you're supposed to do?
Turn fantastical golem-like mons into birds.
>>33457649
I like this one because it really takes Mew inspiration in fetuses
>>33455860
I think this is the only one which is a pokemon and looks realistic
>>33458340
Dragons aren't realistic either. Stop with your double standards.
>>33453627
>>33454514
>>33454569
>>33454663
10/10
No particular comment, just good.
>>33455113
Japan/10
>>33455129
Spore/10
>>33455287
FinalFantasy/10
>>33454555
99/10
Give the freako and terror to a antiworld/matter satanmon.
>>33455490
Good adaptation of ghosts to animalia, i'm pretty sure that it will trigger 151fanboys.
>>33456847
Regular day on Bahia/Brazil.
>>33458610
I'm not saying I liked any of those either, but good lord you seem like you're full of bile. If you have the type of negative outlook on things as your post leads me to believe, it may be worth attempting a mood detox. Maybe get some fresh air or something.
>>33458888
>double standards
nigger what's the part you can't get about
dragons = organic
living swords and ghosts = not organic
????
holy shit, you're autistic as fuck
Does this trigger you? It's a car, when Pikachu is supposed to be a mouse! How awful.
>>33459852
Organic=/=realistic
Doesn't mean if it's organic than its realistic. A dragon can't exist because something that big wouldn't be able to fly, it's completely unrealistic. Just like turtles waking on two legs is completely unrealistic. Next time you're at Arvalis's house, please tell him this.
>>33460179
>Organic=/=realistic
It is when we're talking about living creatures. Pokemon are living creatures. A dragon is infinitely more believable than a sword or a statue that can move itself.
Heads up, squad. Another thread has been made featuring drawings of Pokemon that are inaccurate to their canon designs. We can't let this go unpunished.
>>33460176
>>33460255
See this is wheee your argument falls apart.
Who are you to say what is and what isn't more believable? You can't say dragons are more believable than moving swords because they both don't exist. Your entire argument is now just an opinion.
Dragons and ghosts are both unrealistic and stupid. You are in no position to say which one is more believable than the other because they both don't exist.
There's no point in arguing with someone who's argument relies on an opinion.
>>33460536
>You can't say dragons are more believable than moving swords because they both don't exist.
You sure can, a dragon is just a reptile-like animal with wings, something close to what we knows as animals, while moving swords are at best a non carbon based living being and at worst a proof of the paranormal. It is far more closer to reality (and therefore, theoretic "realistic") a creature that is based on other creatures than a being that has no relation to anything we know as living in real life.
Basically if someone invited to show you a fabled creature as real living being and let you guess which one would be before showing, either an unicorn or a ghost, anyone would think unicorn first.
>>33460536
it's not a fucking opinion
pokemon based on non-living objects are already a controversial spot for the entire pokemon fanbase, as many people find them nonsensical, and quite honestly, they are. It's not a fucking opinion; creatures like dragons and dinosaurs existed, and their designs have place into the franchise.
You have been spewing your nonsense throughout this entire thread and quite honestly it's getting tiresome. No one but you thinks this way about the non-organical pokemon as shown by all the answers you have got.
>>33460655
>as many people find them nonsensical, and quite honestly, they are
We are talking about a children's videogame with cartoon monsters here.
>dragons existed
What the fuck is wrong with this board.
>>33460671
creatures LIKE dragons and dinosaurs existed, READ YOU FUCKING ABORTION
>cartoon monsters mean that you need to accept a break from reality where non-living objects are actually living
You see how pokemon can't choose a proper portrayal for ghost types? How they are paranormal according to their type properties and lore, yet are able to lay eggs and make more ghosts with physical mons and other nonsense? That's because ghosts and non-living objects don't make fucking sense from a "realistic" view, that being the objective of these drawings. For fuck's sake, even the Aegislash interpretation most popular on this thread goes for a "bug is actually the one handling the sword" interpretation
>>33457472
Skarmory is an andean condor.
tfw you're somewhat glad that GF stopped adding realism to their designs
>>33460712
Show me a four legged winged fire-breathing reptile you fucking retard, do it or don't reply to me ever again.
You know what ghost are? The spirit of the fucking dead. I could post a million of pictures of realistic ghost and they would all look like humans. No purple bats, just humans.
Now try to justify that one of these creatures is more realistic than the other because at least ghost are just people, and you might not know this but humans actually exist..
And look up pyura chilensis, it explains why it is perfectly reasonable to have rock pokemon actually look like rocks, faggot.
>>33460785
holy shit, ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID
Dragons are a thing because people saw dinosaur fossils and reptiles and associated magical properties to them. That means they have a real life basis unlike a fucking possessed wash machine.
>you know what ghosts are, the spirit of the fucking dead
oh that explains why ghosts in pokemon are able to lay eggs, fuck with others and are corporeal against all kind of physical hits except those that have the fighting/normal property
The ghosts in pokemon and the object-based pokemons don't have a real life basis aside from giving sentience to a non-living object
>look up pyura chilensis
I'm a fucking biologist, I know that there are animals that look like non-living objects, there are shit tons of the, it's called mimetism you jackass. That some animals imitate the aspect of non-living objects doesn't magically make non-living objects acquiring life an acceptable stretch of reality, as I said before it's one of the most controversial concepts in Pokemon
>>33457050
>switching to snivy could save you 15% or more on potions
>>33457868
*cool
>>33453627
What pokemon is that underneath on kyrurems neck??
>>33455481
Ittook me five mimutes to realize thats elekid and magby
>>33460981
pikachu
>>33460813
>I'm a fucking biologist
Are you role playing as Arvalis?
>>33454514
>>33454516
>>33454555
>>33454557
>>33454569
>>33454833
>>33455129
>>33455222
>>33455623
>>33455750
>>33456801
>>33457324
>>33457486
>>33458551
Why do autistic people misunderstand "Realistic" to mean "Real"?
Are you saying a zombie can't be realistic? A dragon? The Xenomorph or any of Guillermo's creatures can't be described as "realistic"? You can't say the practical effects in The Thing look realistic?
Ironically half of this shit is literally backwards. Taking something that IS real and making it look unrealistic by painting like a Pokémon. A realistic Charizard wouldn't be a Komodo Dragon painted red. A "realistic" ghost is not a fucking purple bat. That's not even a realistic bat.
>>33455490
Clever af
>>33455502
Huh
Interesting
>>33455590
Meh
>>33455593
Cute
>>33455650
Its an upside down tadpole
>>33455703
Kek
>>33455744
The pidgeot is tight af
>>33456417
He gave them human body proportions though, fug
>>33456464
I dont like it but its interesting
>>33460813
This level of autism is off the charts. The realistic excuse for "Purple bat" instead of "literal ghost" is that most of the Pokémon that are ghost type are inanimate objects being possessed? That would make them already fucking realistic
>>33460813
Explain what is realistic about psychic, invisible-wall-creating frogs.
>>33461055
the "excuse" for Gengar being a bat instead of a bundle of poison gas that somehow acquired sentience is that pokemon are supposed to be living beings that can breed and interact with the physical world, something that they would be unable to do at all if their lore was consistent with the game mechanics.
>>33461215
explain why a psychic frog is somewhat similar to a living sword when at least the frog design has a basis on reality; real frogs. I haven't seen a living sword or living wash machine. Maybe you have, I guess, considering how autistically you have been rejecting the designs presented on this thread for an entire day.
>>33461049
>95 unique IPs on this thread
you could at least stop samefagging
>>33461371
Science fiction has come up with plenty of pseudo-scientific explanations for having "ghosts". Why is the idea of a ghost explained by scientific principles somehow less realistic to you than psychic frogs creating invisible walls?
I've only posted three times in this thread, try again.
>is that pokemon are supposed to be living beings that can breed
And yet he feels the need to make Pokemon like Magneton into "realistic" levitating magnetic crabs (hah!), despite the fact that the entire Magnemite line are explicitly genderless and can't breed unless it's with Ditto (which can be "realistically" explained by Ditto just budding off a replica of the thing it's "mating" with). Your entire argument falls apart when viewed from this angle.
>>33457472
>steelix
>>33461411
This. I'm fine with Arvalis doing his own thing, but I don't get people that isist that the only realistic approach is a natural one. Making the Magnemite line into robots isn't farfetched at all.
>>33458268
Better then when he made Growlithe and ArCANINE into Tiger-bears because he never saw the obvious dog characteristics in them
REALISTIC MEANS ITS FACE IS ACTUALLY ITS ASS, RIGHT??
AN ANIMAL WHOSE FACE IS A REAL FACE COULD NEEEEEEVER EXIST IN REAL LIFE, IT NEEDS TO BE CHANGED!!
>>33458551
I don't know about you, but I find this "realistic" rendition of Claydol utter adorable.
>Was it just me, or did anyone else use to think that Claydol was an owl?
http://ommanyte.tumblr.com/post/110578714230/was-it-just-me-or-did-anyone-else-use-to-think
>it's another episode of "I'm drawing a pokemon realistically, therefore it must be absolutely disgusting to look at."
>>33457486
I like this one.
>>33461982
>based on a whale
>make it a squid
?
>>33462220
WHALES AREN'T REALISTIC
>>33462073
>it's another episode of "I'm drawing a pokemon realistically, therefore it must be absolutely disgusting to look at, and also randomly a bird."
ftfy
>>33461982
this looks like a different artist
though I guess making it a squid could make kyogre's glowy parts make sense, since squids can glow
>>33456853
Love it.
>>33462268
>this looks like a different artist
Are you under the assumption that all the drawing in this thread is by Arvalis? Because that couldn't be further from the truth.
>>33461371
At least you could argue the reality of ghosts with a scientist because there are so many sightings and such. Dragons just straight up don't exist, and literally can't even if they did.
>Pokemon are supposed to be living beings that can breed and interact with the physical world
This is the worst thing you've said all day, and is objectively false. Tons of Pokemon are based if of non living things and tons of Pokemon straight up can't breed. To say "this is what Pokemon are supposed to be" is downright ignorance, you didn't make Pokemon buddy, you can't say what they should and shouldn't be.
>>33462304
>tons of pokemon straight up can't breed
>what's Ditto
>why the need to metamorphosis stages if they can't breed :^)
>>33460981
Its Raikou,I think the fangs and back fur should be longer.
>>33461982
That one always triggers me
>>33461982
>orca pokemon
>turn it into a squid
how can you fuck up a design this badly
>>33457472
(You)
>>33456801
Disgusting, chubby Mew best Mew.
>>33461982
Something like THIS doesn't make sense because Kyogre is already clearly based on a killer whale and its body shape is close enough to a killer whale that you can just make it a killer whale.
Arvalis only changes Pokemon when it wouldn't make sense as a real living creature.
>>33457351
Actually the best in the thread.