The switch seems like the perfect console for the game.
Thoughts?
>>33452494
I'd like some more ranger
too bad it seemed to have died with the original DS
>>33452494
all you did was walk around and "borrow" pokemon by spinning a circle around them. im glad it's dead. even though it was pretty cool/possible having 7 pokemon follow you around all the time
>>33452494
Not really since the Switch doesn't have a stylus and its screen doesn't respond to them
The series went to shit after the first game anyways
>>33452494
Do you even have a Switch anon?
There's no stylus and the game would have to be played in portable mode at all times to use the touch screen.
Pretty sure you'd smooth out your finger print before you completed the game.
The Wii U on the other hand would have been perfect for another ranger game, but we all know how that turned out.
>>33452799
Waiting for some games to pop up and the price to drop, I'm pretty patient when it comes to consoles :)
>>33452638
>Implying the squel isn't leagues better than the original
Ranger 3 is garbage but 2 is objectively the best in the series.
Would rather have any other spin off except Pokken or Rumble