Another Favs Thread but with a thiccer template

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1

Mjmannella
Another Favs Thread but with a thiccer template 2017-08-31 12:26:58 Post No. 33429059
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: blankSM.png (209KB, 5064x2260px) Image search: [Google]

Another Favs Thread but with a thiccer template Mjmannella 2017-08-31 12:26:58 Post No. 33429059 [Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-31 12:28:03 Post No.33429066
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-31 12:28:03 Post No.33429066 [Report]

>>33429059
Love me some favourite gen 1 steel/dark types
At least white out/remove the square or something

Anonymous 2017-08-31 12:28:38 Post No.33429068
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-31 12:28:38 Post No.33429068 [Report]

>>33429066
You may as well use Alolan forms.

Mjmannella 2017-08-31 12:31:20 Post No.33429087
[Report]

Mjmannella 2017-08-31 12:31:20 Post No.33429087 [Report]

>>33429066
Put Alolan forms in those squares then

Anonymous 2017-08-31 12:31:24 Post No.33429088
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-31 12:31:24 Post No.33429088 [Report]

>>33429068
>alolan forms
>gen 1
if you want to be even more autistic, sure

Mjmannella 2017-08-31 12:32:36 Post No.33429094
[Report]

Mjmannella 2017-08-31 12:32:36 Post No.33429094 [Report]

>>33429088
I guess Unown ? and ! aren't gen II by that logic.

Anonymous 2017-08-31 12:35:52 Post No.33429106
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-31 12:35:52 Post No.33429106 [Report]

>>33429094
>type differences vs purely aesthetic differences
try again

Anonymous 2017-08-31 12:40:06 Post No.33429125
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-31 12:40:06 Post No.33429125 [Report]

>>33429066
Magnemite?

Mjmannella 2017-08-31 12:47:58 Post No.33429156
[Report]

Mjmannella 2017-08-31 12:47:58 Post No.33429156 [Report]

>>33429106
Who says the form of a Gen I Pokémon isn't also gen I? Why is it wrong to say Alolan Muk and Mega Slowbro are Gen I Pokémon?