Gothita is a bird

>>33413107
>"realistic" pokémon
>It's just animals with Pokémon features

post the shaymin

>>33413527
Well shrimp are the closest thing they could model the realistic shaymin after because its based off a hedgehog and hedgehogs don't exist

I've been thinking fish recently.

Her eyes are so far apart. It's like on the sides of her head.

File: pokemon_community_collab__gothitelle_by_flames_flare-dbakc22.png (582KB, 847x943px) Image search: [Google]

582KB, 847x943px

>>33413107
Meanwhile Gothitelle is a bug

>>33413122
>"realistic" pokemon
>it's just the pokemon but with slightly more realistic textures

>>33415733
realistic pokemon is that. There's no point of redesign the pokemon

>>33415733
What else would it be?

>>33413107
>Gothita is a bird
>picture is blatantly based on an owl

>>33416099
>realistic pokemon is that

No it's not.

>>33416119
Something realistic.

>>33413122
>realistic pokemon is realistic

yeah fuck those artists

File: 2a5.jpg (77KB, 400x551px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 400x551px

>>33416212
Anything can be realistic just cause we haven't discovered it doen't mean it cant be real in some way. Especially if there is life on other planets.

>>33416228
>Anything can be realistic

No. The whole point of realistic art is to make it realistic relative to what we know. Otherwise there's no point doing "realistic" art at all.

File: pokk_n_tournament-3332431[1].jpg (63KB, 521x804px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 521x804px

>this is what anti-arvalisfags think makes for a good "realistic pokemon"

File: bird.jpg (18KB, 230x230px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 230x230px

>>33415552

File: 1465548441974.png (156KB, 559x736px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 559x736px

>>33416239

File: arvalis.png (200KB, 631x645px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 631x645px

>>33413527

File: 1469399938358.jpg (117KB, 770x720px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 770x720px

>>33416262

File: 1437964847393.jpg (42KB, 600x402px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 600x402px

>>33416262
>this triggers Arvalisfags because it's not a tiger

>>33416345
No. But Arvalis' does a better job at actually representing Arcanine instead of
>haha it's cute so that automatically means it's good :)

File: 1496758232281.jpg (36KB, 886x886px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 886x886px

>>33416262

>>33416350
>haha it's a squid so that automatically means it's good :)

>>33416367
>haha it's a creative reimagining of a pokemon as an organic creature so it can be realistic yet retain a similar silhouette so that automatically means it's good :)

Fixed.

>>33416324
Its clearly a hedgehog though

>>33416165
I see what you did there.

>>33416667
Hedgehogs can't grow plants on their back you idiot

>>33416819
Neither can shrimp. Pokémon are supposed to be unrealiatic
>lizards can't breeth fire!
>rats cant use thunder!
>otters don't throw shells!

>>33416860
https://www.fishlore.com/aquariumfishforum/threads/bamboo-shrimp-growing-algae-moss-on-his-exoskeleton.183874/