>still no dragon bug type why?

New UB

>>33410792
GF hasn't come up with a good design for that combo yet. Give it a while.

>yanma, the dragonfly, isn't a dragon/bug
Ya fucked up, Game Freak.

>>33410792
>still no bug dark type

>>33410819
Fuck you, Yanmega is one of the best gen 4 designs.

>>33410792
Still no Fire/Grass Pokemon either

File: Tyranids-warhammer-40000-фэндомы-art-1016413.jpg (272KB, 1107x1024px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 1107x1024px

>>33410792
GW would sue them.

>>33410792
Because no pokemon have this typing yet.

>>33412744
>Yanma instead of Flygon which is antlion (=bug) and is already a Dragon
>Dragonfly pun which works only in English

>>33413029
>>Dragonfly pun which works only in English
It wouldn't be first design that only works on one language's wordplay.

>>33413196
What non-Japanese examples are there?

>>33410792
Because Sugi had an artist block

>>33410819
Yanmega, Flygon

>>33413512
Swirlix (fairy floss) and Spearow (sparrow hawk) come to my mind

>>33413842
Swirlix is only a fairy type because it's cute and pink.

>>33414323
>Pink
So is fairy floss, your point?
>Cute
Subjective.

>>33414422
>Fairy Floss
That's cotton candy, right?

>>33414438
Aye, Cotton Candy is another name for Fairy Floss and vice versa.

>>33412744
>Yanma, the dragonfly, isn't Dragon/Flying

>>33413005
GW can't even sue Blizzard. Blizzard built their entire company ripping off GW.

>>33412744
you silly because it's a flies that dragons not a dragons that flies

First Bug/Dragon Pokemon needs to be a Velvet Worm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onychophora

Mega Yanmega maybe?