Necrozma Evolves

>>33403469
Ah, another baseless theory from nothing. Never change, /vp/.

>>33403469
Interesting theory. I can't see it being true, but the concept's appealing.

I turned this theory down the moment Necrozma was revealed to be an armament for the Cosmog evos.

>>33403469
To have an evolution would mean introducing a new Pokémon. It'll just be a forme change.

>>33403479
Ah, another speculative thread based on in-game content being called 'baseless'. Never change, /vp/.

>>33403481
This has never been revealed officially.

>>33403469
Necrozma already evolved, it's a particularly old shiny Minior.

>>33403483
This generation is already missing a third mythical Pokémon for a potential upcoming movie. Adding new Pokémon isn't out of the question at all.

>>33403525
I think in the TCG card showed no evolution

>>33403581
Bummer

>>33403469
>Cosmog is an Ultra Beast
>Necrozma isn't
You people didn't even play the games did you?

>>33403782
What does this even have to do with the OP? Random reply for the sake of replying?

>>33403890
Did you even read the OP?
It's not SUGGESTED Solgaleo/Lunala are UBs, they are.
If Necrozma ISN'T a UB how exactly can it be a UB in armor?

OP basically said
>Lol Necrozma + baby UB = New evolutiuon of a non-UB that is identicle to a UB because it had a UB inside it!

>>33403469
>>33403899
But that's just a theory

A duuuuuuuuuuuuuumb theory.

>>33403483
Hope the form change is a permanent one, and not a dreadful in-battle exclusive form triggered by the mon's own ability.

>>33403469
>Necrozma evolves
stopped reading there, you're a dumbass

>>33403579
Game freak don't introduce new Pokémon in middle of generation.

>>33404122
>Muh patterns

>>33403899
And remember when BW said Kyurem fells from a meteor? You can't be this ignorant to trust exactly what Wicke and Looker say, despite them not even knowing what they're talking about exactly.

Fucking loosen up.

>>33404128
I see no reason, to buy first versions of each generation games, if Game freak just gonna introduce new Pokémon in middle of a generation.

>>33403899
That's not what the OP says.

>>33404397
So your same retarded logic should be applied to forms and mega evolutions? Are thinking straight or what?

File: God_Stone_sprite.png (873B, 24x24px) Image search: [Google]

873B, 24x24px

>>33404383
meteor was just the God stone.
It wasn't actual meteor from Space.

>>33404410
forms and mega evolutions are not new Pokémon, idiot

>>33404117
Cosmog and Cosmoem evolve. Are you going to call GF dumbasses?

>>33404431
It's the same fucking concept of adding new content which you can use in a battle. Stop trying to find loopholes to make your retarded logic work.

>>33404437
But they don't evolve into Necrozma.
Unless, Game freak retcon it.

>>33404442
No. New Pokémon are new Pokémon.
Forms are forms.
You're idiot, if you think we're getting new Pokémon.

>>33404425
God stone isn't even used in the full game. It was shit in the game the devs left behind. It has never been stated where the original dragon came from.

>>33404448
>'You're idiot'

LUL

>>33404449
Lies. God stone is Kyurem stone.
It's the meteor that Kyurem came from.
Kyurem isn't the original dragon-type Pokémon who created Unova

>>33404459
Seriously, we're not getting new Pokémon in middle of generation.

>>33404448
But what if we do? It's a new generation, with legendary Pokemon that evolve. Masada says they like to surprise fans. Surely you can't be this closed-minded. It's not fun at all.

>>33404470
He was talking about versions.
Not Pokémon.

>>33404128
Great argument

>>33404461
You need to stop. Anything you read about what the God Stone is online is merely speculation. GameFreak NEVER covered what it is exactly, and where the original dragon came from. The God Stone probably was its origin, but this is NOT CANON as for now. So stop digging a hole for yourself

>>33404483
No. It's not speculation.
Kyurem meteor was actually the god stone.

>>33404491
Again, this has never been stated. It is not a fact.

>>33404498
>this has never been stated.

The professor says it.

>>33404511
I'd like a screenshot of the professor talking about the God Stone ASAP.

>>33403581
That doesn't mean it can't evolve itself.

>>33404525
She doesn't call " it the gone stone' doe.

>>33404603
So then you cannot possibly say that's what the God Stone is. Are we clear here?

File: Stone.png (116KB, 480x358px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 480x358px

>>33404624

>>33404639
They're not talking about the God Stone here you fucking cunt. They're talking about the Black or White Stone.

>>33403479
Ahh, an actual thread on /vp/ that isn't furrshit or just shitposting and actually generates discussion. Never change /vp/ shitposter never change

>>33404654
How stupid can you be?

>>33404657
Preach o7

>>33404659
But they really aren't talking about the God Stone here. There are no mentions of the God Stone within the game. Only the icon in the game files. That's it. Now can we stop this fucking pointless conversation?

>>33404667
You fool.
Kyurem meteor was actually the god stone.

>>33404704
>"ZekromB2/ReshiramW2 was revived from a rock called the DarkB2/LightW2 Stone. Let's suppose the meteorite from the story and this stone are one and the same...'

They're right. Juniper really wasn't talking about the God Stone. She's talking about the Black or White Stones. Now stop this fucking shit, I'm cringing.

>>33404722
Dark and Light Stone. But yeah this is right.

File: The_Pokémon_from_stones.jpg (53KB, 651x750px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 651x750px

>>33404722
Fool..

File: IMG_8296.gif (938KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

938KB, 500x281px

>>33404753
Is this Bizarro Richard?

>>33404753
>calls someone a fool
>brings up unused icon from bw2 and colour matches it to kyurem
>how dumb do you think people are?
>this is so obvious
>do you think niggas are colour blind?
>does not help prove that the God Stone is mentioned in the game, because it isn't

>>33404770
Are You cause, kyurem meteor was actually just a stone.

>>33404765
Yes.

>>33404783
You're fucking retarded. We know this. The point is that the God Stone was never mentioned in the game. We will never know if GF intended for it to be relevant or not. No matter how hard you argue, the God Stone is just still a piece of shit unused icon from BW2.

>>33404801
No. It's kyurem meteor.
kyurem meteor = kyurem stone

>>33403469
Glad to know I'm not the only one who noticed the similarities between Lusamine's container and Necrozma. I'm starting to wonder, since that crate basically unleaded Nebby's powers and even caused it to evolve, that the Necrozma armor might be meant to boost Solgaleo's and Lunala's power to the fullest. At the same time, though, it's still a torture crate and that's probably why Necrozma is in so much pain.

File: db5.png (340KB, 600x420px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 600x420px

>>33403469
>eviolite Necrozma
Yes.
YES.

>>33404833
>stop trying to set up
>stop using knock off
>stop thinking you can OHKO me

>>33404837
Naysayer, it'll be grossly overpowered in RU

File: Original-Dragon-type-Pokémon-1.jpg (177KB, 651x1709px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 651x1709px

>>33404801
Look at this.

>>33404479
It's not an argument because "There is a pattern" isn't an argument either.

>>33404383
>Loosen up it's not a stupid idea if you assume that the games are completely wrong
Fucking tighten up, you've got plenty screws loose.
>>33404397
Cool? I see no reason to buy the first version either. With retrospect, why buy RS over Emerald? Why buy DP over Platinum?

>>33404801
>>33404808
https://youtu.be/IyZSz3zya1c?t=1m19s

To me it looks like the God Stone was acutally the DNA splicers, even tough it doesn't match the icon 100%

>>33405392

No.

>>33403469
>Necrozma Evolves
Nah the box art legendaries are a fusion of Necrozma and Solgaeo/Lunanal. Why else would they look like a fusion of them both and colress to be present in the game