>be a bored anon trying to draw poliwrath
>google "poliwrath's mouth" to get a reference
>get pic related
Realistic pokemon thread
Hard mode: no arvalis discussion
What a dumbass, those are intestines
>>33348885
at first i thought this was a weird gengar, if you didn't tell me and there wasn't the original version on the pic, i would've never guess it was poliwrath
>>33348954
>>33348965
ah, i see you just like to see the world burn
I shall fix what has been tainted
>>33348885
I need to check the tag on pixiv again.
>>33348954
>>33348965
>>33348968
>>33348979
>>33349007
>>33349017
>>33349029
>>33349040
>>33349042
STOP POSTING THOSE SHIT STAINS EVERY TIME SOMEONE EVEN GETS CLOSE TO MENTIONING THE WORD "REALISTIC"
It should be noted that the tag on pixiv I refer to is リアルポケモン
>>33349054
>stop posting realistic Pokemon in a thread about realistic Pokemon
???
>>33348885
This is cool, and you're clearly good at it but jesus...
That's not a mouth. Those are intestines. Also why are its eyes and teeth like that?
And why choose webbed toes like a duck over frog feet?
Lastly, those arms don't look like they're capable of punching.
Only nitpicking because in those cases the "realism" has made it less realistic of a functional version of Poliwrath.
I actually love how it looks, but I'd call it more of a horror version than realistic.
>>33348954
>>33348965
>>33348968
>>33348972
>>33348979
>>33349007
>>33349017
>>33349029
>>33349042
>>33349054
OP here, when I said "no arvalis discussion" I was talking about the shit arguments that usually derail these threads every fucking time. Posting the guy's pics is fine, just don't turn it into a shitfest. Or do, if you aren't feeling like achieving the hard mode, although only pussies don't go for the hard mode, just saying.
>>33349040
>>33349062
First time seeing these, I like'em. Machine/artificial mons work pretty well drawn realistically.
>>33349066
They are just untalented and useless crap. Bats for Gastly line? Making Mewtwo dripping Ditto's and shit.
That man is a dumb piece of Muk stench.
>>33349090
OP again, I didn't draw this, just found it interesting.
>>33349090
You realize OP didn't draw that right? Did you even read the post?
>>33349095
I just want to see some art different than this. And more Canon-Lore friendly.
>I thought it was realistic tentaquil from the thumbnail
>>33349029
Some of these are cool but WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED with this one? I thought they fucked up the zubat line really badly before I saw it was labelled as Gengar
>>33349116
You've been here too long.
>>33349008
>>33348885
wtf is that shit and how it's poliwrath? i truly despise those "dude le real pokeymanz are grotesque XDDDD"
what a fucking waste
>>33348965
>>33348968
>>33348954
With some tweaking, these are actually fuckin amazing
idc what anyone says, we are at a level cinematically where we can totally pull off a live action pokemon movie
>>33349066
nigger you know what he means
>>33349152
added fun: the ポケットクリーチャー tag is more for bizarre and strange fan art of pokemon, not necessarily "realistic".
>>33349168
Do you think a real life Poliwrath would be cute or something? It's a frog, it'd resemble a huge ass bullfrog standing on 2 legs, if anything.
>>33349123
The way this artist does his work is ''make everything an already existing expecies in the real world and then give it a paintjob as to make it resemble the pokemon''
But then again, it's hard to consider this realistic when you see regular animals being given unrealistic characteristics like >>33349042 Heatran that is a regular red turtle but it has a head made of rocks
>>33349168
>>33349219
the problem with op's picture is that the artist forgot a lot of details, like giving it a white belly and hands, instead he made it completely purple for some reason
>>33348993
Why would they change a clearly abstract design into a bird? It's like they don't even like anything cool.
>>33349305
better?
>>33349305
that's the thing about realistic Pokemon art
it is inherently less cool
>>33348885
Don't know why a ghost is tangible, but it's nice art
>>33348941
I think this is kind of cute and really well made desu
>>33349340
It's an inherently silly concept so it should be played with as such.
>>33349236
That's the problem I have with him honestly. He tries too hard to make them look like existing creatures with minor things copy pasted around. What especially irks me is he does write some neat lore stuff explaining a lot of it, but despite it being a world with technology like Pokeballs and such, he refuses to make Pokemon that are inorganic or have inorganic parts retain that side of them.
>>33349219
like I said, it barely resembles anything. the colors, the weird mouth... it just seems like a tryhard attempt for "realistic" pokemon, which translates to "dude, lets turn it into some weird ass creepy monster"
I heard you guys are having a realistic pokemon thread
>>33349335
More creative, but still no, it's not even based on anything biological. It's like taking Claydol and turning it into a many-eyed goblin, when it's closer to something like... a clay doll.
Staying faithful to the originals is the best way to do this kind of thing. If you remain to faithful to life, you get bat-gengar.
>>33349422
Agreed, but I can't really find anything like that for Sigilyph. Either that or I'm not looking hard enough. The only thing I did find was >>33349348 , which looks nice
>>33349413
Dear god, is this a Furby x Pokemon crossover?
>>33349342
WHAT THE FUCK
HE'S OBVIOUSLY A FUCKING HEDGEHOG WHY THE FUCK WOULD SOMEONE DRAW HIM AS A SHIRMP THAT MAKES NO SENSE
>>33349440
I don't think there's a lot of Sigilyph art out there that doesn't take a lot of creative liberties. >>33349348
is a pretty faithful representation, I suppose, aside from the use of feathers. I shouldn't nitpick though, when there are SO many people who totally miss the idea.
>>33349116
I thought it was tentaquil too
>>33349348
I much prefer these kinds of realistic Pokemon, that change textures and proportions (such as making cartoon fins look more like real fins and making heads less cartoony) rather than modifying a real world animal to look like a Pokemon.
>>33349480
It's more realistic this way. It's like that Arvalis guy, the goal is reimagining the pokemon as a real being. Shrimp are real and can match the colors in a cool way, and since hedgehogs don't actually exist it's a shrimp.
Realism makes the pokemon better honestly
>>33349007
WHY ARE THEY DOGS
>>33349371
What pokemon is that
>>33349930
Ludicolo
>>33349570
>and since hedgehogs don't actually exist
>>33349570
>hedgehogs don't actually exist
>>33348954
>>33348965
>>33348968
>Let me draw animals and recolor them as Pokemon that barely represent the actual thought and inspiration put into the original creature designs
>Don't hate on muh creativity, haters
Fuck that guy. I can hand it to him that he can paint and render textures and anatomy of animals very well, but in terms of creating a realistic creature design, he falls very short on that aspect.
>>33349570
>hedgehogs don't exist
>>33349570
> It's like that Arvalis guy, the goal is reimagining the pokemon as a real being.
There's a difference between this >>33349103
And drawing a purple cat
>>33349570
>since hedgehogs don't actually exist
>>33349570
>hedgehogs don't actually exist
what, is this the new implying owls are birds?
>>33349570
I wish squids were real :/
>>33349570
>Shrimp are real and can match the colors in a cool way, and since hedgehogs don't actually exist it's a shrimp.
Nigger what
>>33349570
>implying shrimp are real
>>33350433
And jellyfish, too
>>33350433
>>33350462
>>33349570
>tfw no shrimp-based Pokémon
>>33349062
intradasting
>>33349152
somethingbuggingyou?
>>33350511
>using proper light so it's not another "omg real pokimanz r scary"
I wanna blow this guy
>>33350893
>oddish as a parasite
bretty guud
>>33350895
>makes a bad pun without a carlos reaction image
i'm disappointed of you, anon.
>>33349570
>>33350077
>>33350078
>>33350405
>>33350422
>>33350427
>>33350436
How fucking new do you have to be to fall for this shit? Either that or you all just want to be in the epic screencap reaction compilation
you may not like it, but this is what real mew looks like
i kno this is by that guy u all hate but i rly like whale dragonite
>>33350946
oh actually thats not by him maybe? idk the filename says something else maybe this is his.
>>33350958
fuck it im drunk. i also have a 20mb rayquaza gif this guy you dont like made its pretty sick if you wanna google for it. obviously thats way over the image size limit.
>>33350950
lmao
>>33350501
>>33350504
>>33350511
>>33350514
>>33350517
>>33350523
>>33350525
>>33350530
I would love to see more in this style. Realistic doesn't mean grotesque.
>>33348965
>Realistic Pokemon
>6 limbs on Charizard
>>33349480
>>33349570
to the retards who miss the point, it was a parody of the guys work
>>33351122
Christ
>>33349017
lol arcanine and growlithe are dogs
>>33351158
silly anon, dogs don't exist
>>33351122
stage 4 testicular cancer
>>33351228
kek
>>33351158
Are they?
They seem to be based on those chinese guardian lions, with the fluffy manes and all the legends surrounding them
>>33350946
>the way you type
How old are you?
>>33350922
now this is a realistic poliwrath that i can get behind, it looks so fun but realistic as it is just a muscular anthro frog
>>33351265
>>33349305
But it is a bird drawn in like an ancient hieroglyphic kind of way
>>33351682
Why would they not draw it more like a greyhound? It's not a very stocky build in the games...
>>33349518
Yep. You have to keep in mind that Pokemon are monsters and not generic animals while not straying away too far from the original. Otherwise you end up looking like a tryhard or make people have to squint to understand what Pokemon you're even drawing, like pic related
>>33351254
the guardian 'lions' or shishi are lion/dog/dragon chimeras.
some even have tiger, monkey or rhino mixed in, but the dog and dragon base seem to be the most consistent.
>>33350938
Yes. I can get into this.
>>33350976
Charizard aways had six limbs.
>>33349066
Those aren't realistic Pokémon. Those are random animals made to look LIKE Pokémon. REALISTIC doesn't mean REAL. Dragons are REALISTIC.
>>33350900
>Fall for
Yes anon, we all "fell for" that other anons joke. We're such fools for being amused by a thing that was meant to be amusing.
>>33349007
whats his thought process with these
"lets see a ghost that haunts a tree, alright i got it its an octopus that for some reason lives on land and uses trees as armor. man im so smart!!!!!!"
god i hate arvalis
>>33349570
I dont know if this is bait or you are a genuine retard.
Btw put me in the screenshot
i sur do luv dem pokemans
>>33350918
dragonite is fat, charizard is the fit one.
>>33349570
>since hedgehogs don't actually exist
wat
>>33350501
>>33350504
>>33350511
>>33350514
>>33350517
>>33350523
>>33350525
>>33350530
>giving them all human eyes
It would be so easy to make these not look like shit, but the artist botched it with one detail.
>>33351780
It's a meme.
>>33349570
>>hedgehogs don't actually exist
>>33348885
>realistic
there's nothing realistic about that thing.
>>33350501
>>33350504
>>33350511
>>33350514
>>33350517
>>33350523
>>33350525
>>33350530
GOAT realistic pokemon style.
I wouldn't have minded if Pokken looked like this.
>>33350899
Because that would make it way better right? Not repetitive at all? Oh wait it's okay to be repetitive if it's a 4chan meme kekkenstein
>>33350916
Arbok wat r u doin
ARBOK
STAHP
>>33354130
This. Some of them can pull it off but that Blastoise and Tyranitar are disgusting.
>>33350893
I love it!
>>33354130
>human eyes
Good job failing high school biology
Multiple species share almost identical eyes. Those look more like reptile+canine+feline eyes, which are very common. Oh shit! The majority of those are reptiles! The only one that doesn't work is Gyarados, consider that's more of a fish.
Would you fuck her?
>>33349062
Took me a little bit to figure out what this was, but that's a nice magnet.
Futuristic Pokemon games when?
>>33354657
>>33354671
>>33354681
>>33354696
>>33354563
They still look like human eyes visually because too much of their sclera is showing you retard.
>>33354696
AYY LMAO
>>33349059
>"realistic" mantis
>it's a fucking dinosaur
>>33354712
>being autistically triggered by the anatomy of a species that has never existed in this ecosystem
who fucking cares
>>33354657
This is fucking terrifying
>>33354713
>>33354749
>>33354714
To be fair, so is Scyther.
>>33354771
>>33354803
>>33350511
>turtle
>having mammalian teeth
TRIGGERED
>>33354637
>>33354818
>Being triggered over a mammal that shoots water having mammalian teeth
>Okay with calling a tortoise a turtle
T-triggered?
>>33354877
>lives in water
>tortoise
Just because English localizators don't know basic biology doesn't mean you have to be like them.
>>33354925
>Has four limbs instead of turtles, does not live in the ocean
>Turtle
>>33350931
>>33354736
>who fucking cares
anyone who wants realistic pokemon and not "literally the same thing but with different textures"
\
>>33348954
FINALLY ONE THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT MORBIDLY OBESE
>>33349007
WHY IS HONEDGE AN INSECT
REEEEEEE
>>33354566
I love it.
>>33349008
i like this approach much better
>>33349059
this at least explains why it can't learn fly.
>>33354714
Do you not know what Scyther looks like?
>>33349099
>dumb piece of Muk stench.
Wow. That is almost worse that "oh my Arceus".
>>33351729
It's a machine shaped into a bird.
>>33349066
>MAGIKARP NOT A KOI, EVEN THOUGH ITS NAME CONTAINS CARP AND ITS JAPANESE NAME IS KINGKOI
>DOESN'T EVEN KEEP THE WHISKERS OR HEAD SHAPE INSTEAD IT LOOKS LIKE A DANG OVERWEIGHT BARRACUDA
>THE TENTACOOL ARE SQUID NOT JELLYFISH
UNLIMITED REEEEEEEEEEE WORKS.jpg
>>33349116
THAT IS NOT A DUCK'S BILL IN ANY REALITY
>>33349118
not nearly a cute like that...
>>33349168
I'd be fine if the pokemon itself were grotesque. There's no making a realistic garbodor not hideous.
>>33355028
TIL turtles have turtles instead of four limbs
>>33349335
Looks like something from a Junji Ito novel.
Sufficiently creepy to be the real creepybird.
>>33349570
What the fuck do you mean hedgehogs don't actually exist?
>>33349858
he couldn't find any foxes to trace.
>>33355254
Everything about this picture highly displeases me. From the flying crabs to the fucking armadillos.
>>33350514
>skin successfully captures both reptilian scales and leaf veins in texture
This guy is good.
>>33355240
>>33355369
>>33355382
Say whatever you want but the ones where he stays closer to the source instead of "octopus tree lmao" are pretty great.
>>33354130
charizard has slit reptile eyes what are you talking about
>>33350938
sufficiently creepy androgynous elf to be psychic/fairy. Wish he'd kept the robe more similar and not gave it a bodice.
>>33350931
looks like some kind of psionic, day/life-ruining freak you'd expect to see on Athas.
>>33350909
at least this one tried to incorporate the cannons.
>>33350916
are arboks seriously that large compared to an aggron?
>>33350922
BattleToads 2.
>>33350909
heheh
Bueno
>>33350922
when did Stamper start playing pokemon?
>>33353890
pokedex entry says they have very fine feathers.
this is just smooth skin
>>33354013
dang, the worst part about this one is, that's technically a very decent interpretation. unlike others that are trying to turn them into random animals or just make them grotesque, this is just de-abstracting all of its simplistic cartoony features and still ending up horrifying.
Fairy types are just disturbing as a rule.
>>33354566
good thing two heads will grow back in righty's place, right? Right..?
>>33355028
I'm sure anon hopefully meant, blastoise has 4 terrestrial limbs, unlike tirtouga or carracosta which clearly have flippers
>>33355274
>paras has foongus on its back
acceptable.
none of the rest is
>>33355369
I like that shuckle.
>>33354563
>multiple species share almost identical eyes
Yeah, they're almost identical in function and structure, but they're not at all similar visually (which is obviously what I'm talking about).
For your sake, I've put together a collage of animal eyes (alligator, tortoise, salamander, badger, and monitor lizard) -- but there's a twist: one of the six eyes belongs to a human! See if you can guess which one!
>>33354013
I refuse to masturbate to this until it has long eyelashes
>>33354736
I just don't understand why these are so hyped up when they look awful. The weird, human-like eyes look uncanny and creepy next to the nice, realistic scales and fur. These could all be fixed just by making the eyes more bestial.
Look, I've even done shitty mock-ups in photoshop in five minutes that look way less retarded than the original pictures (though still kind of retarded because I did a shit job and they still have uncanny human-like expressions)
>>33356184
These actually do look a lot better.
>>33356184
here they are side-by-side if you're interested
>>33356184
Okay, now I finally see what you're talking about. You don't like the proportions or iris/pupil to the whites.
Which is fair. The only time I see whites on an animals eyes is when they're freaked out.
That said, many pokemon canonically have large visible whites.
Including all of the ones you linked here>>33354130
Now, Misdreavus, Igglybuff, Gengar, Luxray. or Eevee, I would totally understand being mad about.
>>33356184
Feraligatr looks amazing
Tyrannitar looks like it has downs bc it's eyes are two small
Blastoise still looks creepy but that's because of the structure around the eye itself. It's too rounded. You'd have to redo the whole face. The eye is too depressed. There's no real quick fix for that
I think venusaur should have more pupil showing and less iris. I think it would look better with less iris. It might give it more of a prehistoric wild look that I think looks better with venusaur to counteract the weight.
>>33356272
>That said, many pokemon canonically have large visible whites.
I get that, but if you're making Pokémon "realistic," if you're giving them realistic fur and scales, I don't see why you'd stop at the eyes, especially if the human-like eyes look so ridiculous when the Pokémon aren't as cartoonish.
>>33354111
I need to stop to thinking these things.
SPEAKING OF EYES
gamefreak can we PLEASE HAVE SOME MORE APPRECIATION FOR SHARKS HERE? SHARPEDO IS A DISGRACE FOR BWING THE ONLY SHARK POKEMON
>>33356286
maybe slightly less worse tyranitar?
>>33353774
this is how you do a "realistic" pokemon
>>33356379
As someone who loves sharks, I'm frankly appalled that the only shark Pokémon we have is so shitty. I mean, it's practically half a shark.
>>33356324
>not the gif
>>33356418
Same. We have so many water pokemon and only ONE resembles a shark??? There's so many different sharks that can have cool concepts you can run with. If you showed someone a rough shark they'd probably be confused like "that's a shark????" I'm sure you can make a good concept off the tiger shark, especially since they're common around Hawaii.
Rip gamefreak ever caring about sharks
>>33354657
Shinji get in the fucking robot
>>33350929
I WANT TO BELIEVE
>>33356460
I'd love to see a wailord-esque whale shark. Or maybe a water/fairy cookie-cutter shark. Maybe some kind of bearded wobbegong type-shark.
There's so much that could be done, and so many cool sharks, and somehow we've only got one mediocre (to be police) sort-of-great-white Pokémon that hasn't even got a shark-like body.
>>33356315
I mean, it makes sense for them to have large expressive eyes for the same reason a dog does. They are social animals that use facial expressions for communication with each other and to human partners.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635709001004
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082686
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3sOn1yeP5o
>>33356235
Your autism calmed down now?
>>33356513
Actually, can the water/fairy cookie-cutter shark -- those are way more terrifying than I remember. Maybe a water/fairy pygmy shark
>>33356472
Can the poster in this thread who's being triggered by eyeballs kindly stop posting so much?
>>33356562
see
>>33355616
>Fairy types are just disturbing as a rule.
>>33356558
Nah b, I'm as autistic as ever. But at least I won an internet argument.
>>33356648
>>33356587
What about the pocket shark!?
It's smol and hard to find
>>33355254
>making magneton a fucking crab
>clearly having magnets which is a real thing
who is this artist, and why is he SO fucking shit.
>>33356648
>>33356663
boo! hiss! realistic is not synonymous with cartoonishly grotesque
>>33356587
Or the big eye thresher
It's literally something out of an anime
It could be a cute but deadly thing
>>33356702
Living magnets aren't a real thing.
The guy's entire project is explaining how Pokémon might plausibly exist in the real world (the real world without, say, ghosts or sentient magnets). The way he explains more bizarre Pokémon (like haunted trees or living magnets or ghosts) is that they're actual animals that've been mistaken for supernatural phenomena.
I don't know why people have such a difficult time understanding this, or why his project makes so many people 'sperg out.
>>33356727
Because moving trees are more realistic than an octopus that can survive out of water and live in a tree
These animals already have supernatural powers
Sentient trees are probably one of the most basic things in any supernatural world.
>>33356745
the octopus tree thing is more plausible than a ghost tree or a sentient tree -- some sort of terrestrial octopus is hardly as supernatural as an animate tree
>>33356745
>Because moving trees are more realistic than an octopus that can survive out of water and live in a tree
They aren't. An octopus breathing oxygen is more believable than a tree with a brain and all the other needed organs to be sentient.
>>33349570
>>33356785
>>33356790
Trees in their own right, most plants honestly, are much more "intelligent" than we give them credit for. Sentient, maybe not, but able to act for itself and use it's own defenses if it became mobile? I'd think so. Plants can fucking hear when they're being eaten. They are every bit alive as any animal.
I'd rather have the tree be moved by something that would actually LIVE IN A TREE and use the dead tree as some sort of armor. The octopus is so fucking stupid.
What about foongus? What animal do you think that should be?
i wouldn't even mind Arvalis' drawings so much if the guy wasn't so full of himself. his drawings aren't bad but they're nowhere as good as he jerks himself off to the thought of.
saurian has only boosted his ego to impossibly higher levels because of all the autistic children creaming themselves over MUH REALISTIC DINOSAURS
>>33356785
>more plausible than a... sentient tree
https://www.pri.org/stories/2014-01-09/new-research-plant-intelligence-may-forever-change-how-you-think-about-plants
It's more likely than you think.
Remember, there are plants more responsive than jellyfish.
>>33356703
But Lickitung is just actually that grotesque.
>>33356663
>>33356727
Then I would expect magnemite to be the result of nanotech let run rogue, not FLYING CRABS.
>>33357020
More like a drone with a screw-shaped propeller and orb body with vice grips painted like magnets.
>>33357006
>>33357040
>>33357058
>>33357062
>it's a "realistic = overly grotesque" thread
>>33355264
i so badly want to hate this but it's just cool as fuck regardless of the source material.
>>33357073
>>33355369
that shuckle looks like it would be really satisfying to eat.
>>33355596
Better?
>it's an autists with no imagination sperg out at arvalis reimaginings episode
>it's a "it has to be cute otherwise it isn't realistic" episode
>>33356272
zekrom has some cool fuckin eyes
>>33357164
>>33356456
uma delicia
Gastly's huge eyes always looked like butterfly wings to me. I know it’s classified as the “gas pokemon” but I always thought it would be neat if deep inside that gas are the remnants of a burnt out skull being used as a tether to our world by an ethereal being of some sort, and the “eyes” are an intimidation tactic. Squint your eyes if you can't see it.
>>33357202
kind of snakey on the onix, but it's hard to do a bunch of disconnected boulders as something realistic.
>>33356909
>What about foongus? What animal do you think that should be?
Obviously it should be an octopus in a mushroom. Are you dense?
this will probs piss u guys off
now post a realistic Misty :^)
>>33357333
>>33357347
>>33357263
>>33357248
>>33357147
realistic Pokémon done right, where you change features of their anatomy to make them look realistic
>>33350530
>>33350525
>>33350523
realistic Pokémon done wrong, where you just apply a texture pack to the existing Pokémon anatomy
>>33357202
i like this one a lot
>>33357365
Welp, I got more, but image limit reached...
6 away from autosage anyways.
Make anew or let it die?
>>33355574
Arbok is 11'6 while Arggon is around 6 foot.
>all the anons that are getting legitimately salty over this guys OWN depictions of what he thinks ACTUAL pokemon would be
/vp/oreons are something else haha
I dont agree with a lot of his design choices, but you cannot call him 'shit' artist because of it. Some of his designs are actually pretty fuckin rad
We need a middle ground between >>33350501
>>33348968
these 2 artists and bam, we'll have an excellent visual for 'realistic' pokes imo
You all are fucking tripping about that one guy's artwork. Sure he changes the entire "species" of the pokemon, but he's not drawing what realistic pokemon would look like in the pokemon universe, he's drawing them in a way where they could actually exist in our world. There's a lot of pokemon that would make no sense in our world.
Personally I think he does the best job at creating realistic pokemon, 80% of other artist's realistic pokemon look like shit, they're just drawing the pokemon itself with texture on it.
>>33357239
thats a pretty cool idea anon. nice picture too
>all this fucking discussion about scleras and nobody is gonna comment on the fact that OP wanted reference for Poliwrath's mouth
>>33355254
I want to ride zapdos fuck this gay earth