I think I know what the walking and running pokemon is for

They're there because the Creatures guys had nothing better to do

>>33277120
Whats GF doing that's so important.

>>33277097
holy shit, you could be right with that, would be so awesome!

>>33277097
Or it can be for following Pokemon. I mean we can have both but it's definitely for following Pokemon, considering that the there walking and running animations, and battle revolution uses only running animations.

File: imgonline-com-ua-twotoone-cAgb89Ag8kIIBcs.jpg (485KB, 3278x1080px) Image search: [Google]

485KB, 3278x1080px

Also if that true. Than battles will have huge background and space like Colosseum or pbr

>>33277178
There are walking moves too

Why they put it for megas if its only for following Pokémon. Its for battles

File: 1502494828073.png (6KB, 240x160px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 240x160px

>>33277097
It was probably for future utility. If they want to have cutscenes with walking Pokémon in the future, they can just use those animations. It's probably why they made the models so high-poly, too.

>>33277205
holy shit PBR looks so S-tier compared to that 3ds shit and it's so old, please game freak don't fuck this up and don't give us those terrible 3ds models where a clefable has the same size as a snorlax and wailord looks like a tiny penis.

>>33277215
I'm saying it's for both. Do you really think they would animate all those Pokemon then be like

>well these will only be for battles and nothing else. Even though we can make these Pokemon fallow the trainer

>>33277215
Maybe if the Pokémon is holding a Mega stone they will appear as a Mega in the overworld. Who knows?

All I know is that the animations seemed like they were more suited for transportation than battle.

>>33277325
>don't give us those terrible 3ds models
they
will
never
change
the
models

why are you so fucking retarded, we have known since fucking 2013 that those models are future proof, and we also know that gamefreak are lazy pieces of shit
the models wont be changed, give up

>>33277325
Creatures inc made both Pokémon models

>>33277178
or both

>>33277356
The same people who made the PBR models are same ones who made the 3ds game models dude

The pbr actually has texture

>>33277356
I think they mean the sizes

>>33277356
>What are tretta models

you are a retarded piece of faggot, if you really believe they will use the same models and not even resize them (give them their actually sizes) then you are just braindead

>>33277356
kek, you are an idiot.
https://youtu.be/etr4fSLC8bc?t=61

>>33277402
Well the models themselves have their actual sizes and are scaled down/up by the game so yeah they won't resize the models.

>>33277414
>Zygarde looks like a ekans in size while it is 5m high.

why the fuck are they doing this?

>>33277416
>MFW the models will trash like in pokemon go
>MFW Wailord will still be a small piece of shit
>MFW flying pokemon still just glide midair

comeon, this will not happen...please?

File: 20170806_191512.jpg (301KB, 497x806px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 497x806px

>>33277414

>>33277356
>since fucking 2013
they've changed Glameow since thentho

>>33277356
>the models are future proof
kek they don't, they made them so bad because the 3ds can't handle shit, check the japanese arcade games, they will probably use them instead, and they are awesome.

>>33277138
programming the games and modeling environments and characters. though they also outsource environment modeling ever since ORAS

>>33277447
Wailord will probably not be small, because the new games will likely not scale the model down for small screen size.

Expect most flying Pokemon to continue to glide in battle. Xatu is the only one I would see not doing that.

>>33277475
why does this look so right in size while it looks retarded in the video, isn't it the same game?

>>33277525
sky battles and soaring would huge reason for it. would love to see soaring back though

>>33277534
holy shit check this

https://youtu.be/qVE9Vz9q45g?t=588

it looks so beautiful, I wanna cry! starts at 9:48

>>33277557
even Bulbasaur and Turtwig have a size difference, damn and it looks soooo good

These games look good
https://youtu.be/CNleWb-kb-A

>>33277353
that sounds dumb as hell

I will probably get BTFO but I still think USUM will have following pokemon. They still haven't shown us footage of the overworld after the protag has his own Pokémon. The only footage we've seen is presumably the protag before getting a starter. Prepared to be in a BTFO thread

>>33278285
get ready to be BTFO than

>>33278300
As should you anon

File: smowl.png (183KB, 251x291px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 251x291px

>>33277557

>>33277097
>tfw PBR didn't have destructible environments

>>33278300
but difference i wont be disspointed if i do get btfo. you honestly there gonna add walking versions in 3rd version. the 3ds would expolde with those models and they even did it for mega pokemon

How do you guys find this information?
How do we know Creatures Inc made the models? I'm very curious how you guys know all this.

File: threeheads_610.jpg (38KB, 610x343px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 610x343px

>>33278484
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2017/08/10/heres-how-game-freak-designs-pokemon-creatures.aspx

creatures making models are old news

>>33278334
You have got to be joking.

>>33277097
The big problem with this is the speed with which it makes battles run
The animations of a turn in PBR take at least twice as long as an equivalent turn in Gen 6/7.
You might think "I don't care, I prefer it" but after you take thirty minutes to even get past the first route because of the animation times, I promise you will turn the animations off.

could be for z moves too so that breakneck blitz doesn't look so silly.

>>33277097
>people thought pbr was bad
Still impresses me when people say this since:
>it was the first pokemon game with actual online
>the best trainer customization in the series down to an avatar,the fucking trainer card, and even fucking battle quotes
>different backgrounds for you to fight in
>meanifgul challenges similar to a battle frontier

But no it sucks because no minigames.

People are fucking retarded

>>33278484
Creatures didn't do shit. All Creatures did was get to always profit off of the franchise by holding some of its copyright because they financed the latter half of Red and Green's development when Game Freak ran out of the money Nintendo gave them. (Mind you, Creatures is a subsidiary of Nintendo anyways, so...)

>Don't get your expetations too high up
Stop being retard switchfaggots

>>33280096
I don't care about gameplay.
I care about new Pokémon in the game.

>>33280093
are you sure ?
http://www.creatures.co.jp/

File: ssbb_leaks_captain_falcon.jpg (17KB, 463x248px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 463x248px

I would like to mention something as a person who has developed for Game Freak before during the early 3DS era and also another game no one's mentioned in this thread.
Some of the models in Tretta are actually ported from PBR and, get this, Pokedex Pro. Remember that? Anyways, Gardevoir has the same idle animation, as does Charmander in the video on >>33277557
Only a select few models from Gen 6 and 7 are ported over from the games they came from. To clarify, most Pokemon have about 8000 to almost 12000 polygons. For comparison, Lightning from Final Fantasy XIII has over 8000 total polygons, and Alan Wake's character model has over 13000. Some of them are touched up, and yes, they are future proof. That doesn't mean, however, that they can't or wont be scaled up. That also doesn't mean it will happen either.
I'm not leaking anything to you guys so don't ask.

>>33280093
http://www.creatures.co.jp/products/

>>33280288
To add onto this: Some of these models are changed over time. Some are REALLY subtle and some require a program or a tool to do a polycount to really make a difference. Some Pokemon get small changes to their model with just a few polygons here and there, but some get changes that remove them as well.

While I do love PBR and also the models there, I would actually be very glad to see the walking and running animations being used for attacking an enemy, like how it was in those games. It felt much more dynamic, and it added to the mysticism of seeing creatures like this battling on a bigger screen than it did with static and flat colors on a screen. It'd explain the various forms that would go away after battle or certain points (Zen Mode, Mega Evolving, etc.) However, I REALLY hope that just like PBR there are a lot more animations for attacking. It bugs me when a Pokemon punches with a kicking move.

>>33277097
oh vp i find something interesting on the creatures page

>>33280324
To give the best example, use a Machoke in the 3D games that are on home consoles with Low Kick and Karate Chop (or just any kicking moves and anything else that makes contact)
Machoke does a drop kick with Low Kick which is fucking cool. And when it needs to use its arms? It uses them. Blaziken does a cartwheel flip to use moves such as Blaze Kick, and uses its arms to use moves like Sky Uppercut. And the animations for the Pokemon in XY/SM? Pretty lackluster by comparison. People say 3D didn't do justice for a lot of Pokemon. No. Game Freak didn't do Justice to 3D.
Though I will admit Pidgeot's idle animation looks really fucking stupid.

>>33280093
From what I understand, they make Spinoffs as well as the majority of merchandise, TCG, anime etc.

In general, Game Freak make new Pokémon and the main series games, Nintendo do a few licensing things and spinoffs, Creatures do the bulk of merchandise.
TPCI themselves (which are a company joint owned by the three) have very, very few employees and are basically just for marketing and distribution (they organise the competitive circuit and a bunch of other advertising schemes)

>>33280380
>>33280093
https://cgworld.jp/interview/gamefreak-201707.html even gamefreak said. creatures inc make the pokemon models

>>33280288
Can you tell us a bit more about your role or if you know anything about the franchises future?

File: facility3.jpg (182KB, 1206x640px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1206x640px

mmm

>>33280521
Is this Game Freak?

File: facility5.jpg (123KB, 1206x640px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1206x640px

>>33280526
creatures

>>33280537
Awesome! Is there anything you can share with us at all? Any information for example?

File: 1482950385135.gif (1MB, 250x142px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x142px

>people still think the animations will allow for following pokemon

File: Screenshot_20170813-120808.png (222KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1080x1920px

>>33280557
creatures inc interview last month

File: product_img_3dcg.jpg (221KB, 967x768px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 967x768px

Creatures made the gale models

File: Screenshot_20170813-123015.png (641KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 1080x1920px

>>33280704
surpised they did pokken also. very impressive

>>33280559
People think they did all that work for a shitty pokemon snap feature which only includes a handful of mons

>>33280559
If they made those animations for Snap 1 1/2 or whatever, they wouldn't bother to make them for stuff like Megas and legendaries, right?

>>33281241
wait till USUM when the construction everyone thinks are gyms turn out to really be decorative stages for you to snap shots of your own pokemon.

>>33281375
if it were for following why would they bother to make them for megas if you can't have them outside battle?

>>33281531
>if it were for following why would they bother to make them for megas if you can't have them outside battle?
Read the op

>>33281531
You're a fucking idiot if you think GF would would make 2 animations for every single fucking Pokemon, including alt forms and mega evolutions, and had no intention to do following Pokemon. It's entirely possible that you could just select to Mega Evolve your Pokemon outside of battle in the team status menu. It's not that hard to imagine how it would work.
I don't think following Pokemon will be in USUM though, I see it being the main draw for Pokemon Switch.

>>33281795
No it's clear from the op. Battle animation much easier

>>33281814
Why not both?

>>33281792
read the comment you replied to

>>33281795
you're delusional.

>>33277435
the issue I have with it is that Charmander is half its height when it's 61cm tall