>pokemon comic or youtube video
>oh my arceus!
>replacing common proverbs that mention animals with pokemon names
>joke about nor knowing how eggs are made
>>33250185
>Joke about Ditto being a whore
>/vp/
>>33250185
>not replacing certain words with pokemon phrases
Casual faggot fucking force palm around your neck and shadow sneak your way into the distortion world
>>33250185
>parody only contains Kanto pokemon with the occasional Lucario/Gardevoir.
>>33250456
>force palm around your neck and shadow sneak your way into the distortion world
>pokemon parody
>Ash and co.
>LOL GEN 20 OBJECT POKEMON
>"super effective" status moves
>LMAOJEJ ASH IS STILL 10 AFTER 90 YEARS XD
>>33250185
>sex, drugs and/or objectmon jokes
>OS Ash or Pixiv Red as the protagonist
>Pikachu talking like a nigger
>>33251120
can you give us an example of that? cause it sounds like you're reaching
>>33251139
>Penis used Harden!/Dog used Growl!/ect.
>It's super effective!
>STATUS MOVES CAN'T BE FUCKING SUPER EFFECTIVE YOU STUPID FUCKING DOUCHEBAG I DON'T KNOW WHY THIS TRIGGERS ME SO MUCH BUT IT DOES GOD FUCKING DAMN IT
>OH NOES HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO GET PAST THIS KNEE HIGH LEDGE
>THIS TINY TREE IS INVINCIBLE WTF
>AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA MY POGEMON TURNED INTO A LAPRAPS
>haha nebby won't get in the bag xD
>haha le fug rayquaza xD
>>33250185
>haha pokemon irl would be violent XD
>because animals fighting XD
>LMAO IT'S 4X WEAK TO FAIRY
>>33250185
>insults people for using illegal pokemon but still gens instead of playing game legit
>>33251305
wrong thread verlis
>>33251177
have you never seen a mainstream pokemon parody video before
>>33251357
yes, pretty much every example in this thread
but can you give me an example of that post?
Ok misters "hardcore players", how would be the perfect Pokémon parody animation for /vp/?
>>33251389
one that does the following
1: is accurate to the source material
2: is funny
and that's it. don't overcomplicate a very simple process.
>backwards
>>33251389
simply not doing it
>>33251436
Then watch the anime
>>33251446
>1: is accurate to the source material
>>33251446
>"parody" = "several hundred episode long series of commercials"
no thanks
>>33250185
>any parody being about/mentioning Ash at all
>>33251438
I always loved the little sludge icon in GS, it's cute as shit. Wouldn't mind a plush of it.
>>33251491
What if it is a parody about how shit the ashnime is?
>>33251454
>>33251488
You can't have a 100% accurate parody to the source material. Either you exaggerate everything or made a series adapting the events in the game/novel/manga/comic/board game.
>>33251609
why make it in the first place?
>>33251632
Because it's funny, relaxing and you can gain money and experience with these projects.
>>33250185
>it's this comic
Welcome to hell motherfucker
>something something animal abuse
>>33250185
Isn't Arceus supposed to be extremely obscure in-series?
Not many people know about that creation myth, and even then most books and such just refer to an "original one".
Only dedicated archaeologists like Cynthia and the guy at the Ruins of Alph actually know Arceus's name.
>>33251645
>Because it's funny
ok I get that
>relaxing
?
>and you can gain money
that's the cancer of the internet nowadays, trying to make memes profitable
>and experience
?
>>33251653
Everything about this triggers me
>>33251389
Don't take the lowest hanging fruit that's meant to appeal to the lowest common denominator. Don't reuse jokes that have already been done to death. Don't add unnecessary retard humor like "weed 420 Pikachu xD". Don't always use Ash in his original series clothes because it stopped being relevant 15 years ago and is only briefly relevant again now because of the new movie. Don't just make jokes that people who haven't played Pokémon in over 15 years will get, because it implies that you have a very limited understanding of what you're joking about.
Try making a joke about RNG abuse. Not a lot of people are familiar with it, but you can make light of the ridiculous amount of research Pokémon games bring about, and how it took until Pokémon X and Y for the 3DS to finally be significantly cracked. Maybe make a joke about the evolving art style over the years. Do a joke that actual Pokémon fans will enjoy.
>>33252171
>Don't take the lowest hanging fruit that's meant to appeal to the lowest common denominator.
This. Rarecandytreatment was good about that, not every joke was a hit but they at least tried things other than "LOL Oak can't tell if you're a boy or a girl"
I miss that webcomic
>>33251365
probably means something like this
https://youtu.be/EZCfJqr7Eao
>>33252256
All the problems talked about in this thread literally applied to this video.
>>33252256
not as bad as this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeOS8gK2OZE
>>33250185
>>33250246I like those :c
>>33252343
And when I thought >>33252256 was the bottom of the barrel.
>>33252343
>explicitly a pokemon parody
>uses bootleg designs
what's purpose
>>33252997
>scientifically accurate
Are you dumb
>>33253030
did you not look at the thumbnail?
>>33251653
>Machoke has five moves
>leer confused the Clefairy
>>33253049
>sleep powder is super effective
>>33253049
>Clefairy was charmed by Charm
It makes sense but that ain't what it does.
>>33252251
Yeah, that guy's comics were really good. Makes me a little disappointed that there aren't many comics that are as funny as the Rare Candy Treatment comics.
>>33254638
He's still around as Bummer on PS or Smogon
>Oddish appears
>DUDE, WEED, LMAO
>pokemon parody
>it's full of gore and blood, pokemon die when they faint
Why does everyone do this? It was never funny. Find me ONE of these shitty 2minute cartoony fan animations that aren't like that
>>33251291
But that's a good thing silly.
>>33256592
Why is sylveon x hydreigon such an exquisite pairing?
>Pokemon talks to his trainner
>"-Master..."
>>33258894
I don't know why I hate this one so much but I do.
>>33258894
I fucking hate this, in all contexts.
>>33258894
This
>>33250185
>DUDE! MISSINGNO!
it's a glitch in a 20 year old game. it's nothing more than that
>>33258894
Is it because
A. it implies a master/slave relationship?
B. They should just use the trainer's real name?
Or
C. because Pokemon shouldn't talk?
>>33250185
>oh my arceus
>>33259070
>A. it implies a master/slave relationship?
>B. They should just use the trainer's real name?
These, kinda with C. but if they're psychic or it's from the pokemon's perspective it's okay.