Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
File: roothoot.png (214KB, 741x801px) Image search:
[Google]
214KB, 741x801px
Can someone catch me up with Roothoot?
Why is everyone saying it's real? Yes, I know the design """leaked""" before the starter names did, but couldn't the faker just randomly have guessed the Grass-type starter would be a green/brown-coloured and an owl? It's not an impossible scenario.
I'm honestly not 100% convinced.
>>
Fuck off HB
>>
>>33219986
It's gonna be an ultra form but like always /vp/ is still in denial
>>
>>33219999
Quads confirm
>>
File: 1493502215042.png (564KB, 902x1011px) Image search:
[Google]
564KB, 902x1011px
>>33219986
>expecting /vp/ with all its autistbase not to catch and abuse a retarded meme
>>
File: roothootfags.png (366KB, 480x430px) Image search:
[Google]
366KB, 480x430px
>>
>>33220725
>>33220747
I legitimately don't see why you're making fun of this or are sarcastic. Can you prove Roothoot is not legit? I'll take a screenshot of the original date it was posted and the date of the name leaks as proof that it's not legit if the date of the names is earlier than the other one.
So can you offer proof? No? Then shut the fuck up.
>>
>>33222153
Yes, I can, in fact, prove the fact that Roothoot is not legit. By pointing out that it is not present in any Pokemon game revealed this far. I'll gladly acknowledge it when it appearswhich is never because it's a bad quality fakemon tied to an even worse quality meme.
>>
>>33222839
based money
>>
Do people actually like this design that's even more plain, ugly, and lazy than Dusk Lycanroc?
>>
>>33223194
dusk lycanroc is even worse, is recolored.
>>
>>33219986
Because the design is too damn similar to Rowlet to be a coincidence. Fuck, the colors are almost identical. It's too unlikely that someone could have guessed that it was a grass owl, guessed its basic design AND its colours with like a 90% accuracy. Roothooot being an early Rowlet concept is a better explanation than some "faker" got really, really, really lucky.
>>
>>33219999
>>33220073
>>33222153
>>33223272
>"It was leaked for sun moon but it's coming out in ultra sun and moon, right?"
>Still believing the worst fakemon ever that doesn't even look fully evolved
>>
>>33223470
>>Still believing the worst fakemon ever that doesn't even look fully evolved
you have mistaken by grasshole
>>
File: 346356536356.png (330KB, 700x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
330KB, 700x1000px
>It's another "hopebiscuit always earn money" thread
>>
>>33223204
At least it's aesthetically pleasing to look at whatsoever
>>
>>33223555
>let's recolor a pokemon
>call it new form
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5