Post the pokemon that let you know the series was going downhill
>>33109397
There is nothing wrong with Darkrai.
I like a lot of designs in Gen V, but holy fuck I knew this was the beginning of the end.
>>33109412
You gotta admit its design was a farcry from what originally pokemon was intended to be.
Take your pick, really. Between the abominable starters, the gen 1 rehashes, the MLP quartet, and the literal recolors, and literal shit like Stunfisk and Druddigon, there's very little silver lining here.
>>33109486
Oh, and worst of all, the elemental monkeys. My mind blocked them out even though I just saw them, that's how awful they are.
>>33109486
Bisharp too?
>>33109486
Woah now, leave reuniclus out of this
>>33109583
Yes.I was being a bit harsh - there are ten mons there that I like.Emboar, Scolipede line, Joltik and Galvantula, Eelektross, Golurk, Bisharp
>>33109486
>abominable starters
>>33109610
>Emboar
>>33109610
ForgotDurant
>>33109612
By "abominable starters", I was referring to the Serperior and Samurott lines. Especially the latter. I also think Pignite is retarded, while Tepig is just okay, but Emboar is a reference to Zhu Bajie and that makes him alright by me.
>>33109621
I like Emboar too, but that's a really stupid and superficial reason to change your mind on a design. Also, source on the fact it's based on Zhu Bajie?
Lilfella
>>33109637
>but that's a really stupid and superficial reason to change your mind on a design
I don't exactly think Emboar is a bad design. I thought it was just okay, but if they were referencing Zhu Bajie, that makes me give it some extra brownie points.
And it just seems logical. The Fire/Fighting starter in Gen 4 was based on Sun Wukong, Emboar came right after and according to Sugimori, the Emboar line was designed "in a Chinese style".
>>33109621
but.... serperior is sexy!