Wouldnt the series be better with old pokemon only?
New pokemon ruin the fun that is catching old pokemon
>>33109111
When you were a kid, all Pokémon were new. That's why it was fun, at least to me. Discovering new Pokémon is what keeps the game interesting, additions to the lore and ecosystem are what make the game fun to think about.
reminder that if you respond to this thread op wins
Opposite for me. The old Pokemon have ruined sun and moon for me.
The spawn rates are so low for new Pokemon. All I see is Pokemon I caught for last 15 years
>>33109111
I like having a shifting meta
I do wish they'd try a bit harder to fix past mistakes rather than just continuously making new stuff, but at least it keeps the meta alive and interesting, shifting generation after generation
While OP is obvious b8, is there anyone actually interested in Pokemon that unironically thinks this? That means normies who saw pokemon long ago don't count
>>33109171
OP here.
Of course! New pokemon are pointless, they're new and unfamiliar
If you play pokemon for the new pokemon you're doing it wrong
>>33109111
Worldbuilding and lore. Moreso if one keeps an open mind on the new monster designs.
Also, the series established itself to a point when you could enjoy the narrative of the games without relying on the anime to expand on it since like Hoenn.
>>33109119
>>33109124
>>33109129
>>33109135
>>33109171
>>33109256
If you play pokemon for the new pokemon you're doing it wrong
>>33109475
If you play Pokemon for the story. Your definitely doing it wrong.
Pokemon has bottom tier stories for RPG games
New Pokemon a big reason to play the newer games
>>33109545
You're wrong.
Everybody disagrees with you