Nintendo switch will save us after the 3ds train wreck games

We have this thread almost every fucking day. How butthurt are you?

>>33076745
Inb4 locked in handheld only.

>>33076745
People like to call gamrfreak lazy but their really not. Most of the problems with recent games have come from the directors not the actual company its self. I bet SM would've been been better with a bit of more time but they had to rush it out for the 30th anniversary.

>>33076783
Creatures makes the models and there pretty top tier. It's impossible to see it with shit 3ds

>>33076783
It seems like sm was in development before x and y came out.

>>33076816
No according 4chan logic, they began development in 2016 and rushed through the whole thing while cramming in as many glitches and bugs as possible

>>33076867
XY had hints for SM

More like nintendo shit

>>33076874
Hints just mean the ideas were there

File: e4d2.png (12KB, 560x407px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 560x407px

>>33076745
>Pokemon Colosseum not mainline tv game
I mean hey, back in the day it was a really on-point spinoff comparative to the main series.
But none of you faggots will admit it because of its autistic sibling.

>>33076780
Oh you know GF will do just that

>>33076971
With the current switch design. That would be awful

It's too big to be portable

>>33076745

Fuck off and stop making this thread, Pokebarneyfag.

>>33076745
how the fuck do i find a switch to buy?

>>33076745
>No more shitty audio
Literally was not a problem with the 3DS. Shit was leaps and bounds above DS and even DS' sound wasn't a slouch either. The difference was just bigger sample memory.

Now, if we're talking about sample compression, that's where I'll agree with you.

>>33076745
>Being able to play Pokemon mainline online for first time
>Forgetting that you could play gen 3 on your tv

>>33077492
GameStop.

>>33077492
http://www.nowinstock.net/videogaming/consoles/nintendoswitch/

>>33077507
You could play every game up to Diamond and pearl on your TV

>>33076745
>paid online
It'll be even worse

>>33076745
I know its the internet and people will argue about anything, but honestly what are some of the reasons people don't want mainline games on the switch besides not owning one/wanting to buy one?

>>33078787
If it has better quality I would gladly pay.

>>33079039
I don't have a Switch specifically because of the paid online bullshit but I've been told the Switch online is on par with Wii and Wii U.

>people actually think the games won't just be more of the same shit

>>33079199
That's because there won't be online features until 2018

>>33076780
With sharing save files all but assured this will be hilarious.
>>33076966
>we could have had another Colosseum game
>instead we get a handheld franchise shoehorned into a home console.
>>33079039
At this point? No.
Even the mobile app to "Streamline" the process is garbage, and if you're talking the quality of connection we're basically paying for what we got for free earlier.

>>33076745
Oh. Hey. It's one of those "graphics are more important than gameplay" summerfags.

>>33079394
>I like 5fps double battles

File: IMG_2493.jpg (68KB, 640x334px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 640x334px

>>33079387
>Calling the switch a home console when even Pokémon company themselves said its a hybrid

>>33079463
>he doesn't actually own a 3DS

>>33079480
Yes i do. Double battles even lag on my n3dsxl

>>33076745
So all your reasons can be described as "it will look better and not just handheld anymore" How does that change anything about Pokemon current problems other than lags?

>>33076745
>PC will save us afterr the 3ds train wreck games
>No more 240p, 4K 60 fps instead
>No more shitty audio, Hq audio sound card instead
>Being able to play Pokemon mainline on any tv or monitor since, you know VGA, HDMI
and DisplayPort are a thing.
>Being able to emulate any Mainline or Spinoff
Pokemon game through VBA, Desmume, Dolphin and Citra, everything being playable except XY which is garbage anyways.

>>33079364
Wouldn't it make more sense to show what the online will be like at its best during this "free trial" so you can entice people into buying that bullshit?

>>33076745
stop posting this thread

>>33078787
But it's like $20

>>33079214
Same shit but prettier to look at

>>33079004
Good question

>>33076745
I hope it's not just on the Switch.

>>33081095
It will only be on switch

>>33080771
It's $20 too much

> Being able to play Pokemon mainline

hahahahaha

>>33082431
https://youtu.be/M2mZS_p4A7Y
9:23

>>33078787
It already is when you see the online app. It's not being run into the ground in it's reviews for nothing.

>>33079476
>calling the switch a hybrid when Gamefreak themselves have said they view it as a home console.