Is there ANYTHING more embarrassing than being a 3DS user?

being the creator of this autistic image

Frogposting

Is there anything more embarassing than shitposting on a hebrew countryside sewing discusson forum, specifically the parts about a video game franchise concerning the collection of fantastical creatures?

>>32999118
please lurk and learn our board culture or go back to /v/

>>32999118
was this supposed to be funny?

File: vp circa 2011.png (156KB, 1356x1880px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1356x1880px

Is this the cringe thread?

File: Pathetic_3DS_User~01.png (36KB, 169x180px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 169x180px

>>32999139
>>32999129
>>32999127
>>32999121
>>32999119

>>32999118
>Can't emulate Super Nintendo
Fag, New 3DS CAN emulate Super Nintendo, I don't know why they never made GBA open to public in general.

>>32999118
>Switch
>enviable at all
>Switch
>Game Freak
>1080p 60fps

>>32999147
>You just have to buy another console I don't see what the big deal is

>>32999154
My o3DS emulates SNES games

>>32999148
This, Pokemon at 1080p 60fps would be possible for any developer but GameFreak, who enjoys a get out of criticism free card

>>32999118
The only thing that's better about the switch is graphics and fps (Both of which are fine on the 3DS).

File: 1487668445596.jpg (38KB, 515x479px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 515x479px

>no touchscreen
game play > graphics
this board is full of plebs and the switch is a step back

>>32999118
3DS user
>Holy shit, i have pretty much all of the mainline pokemon games to play!, and even a lot of the spinoff!

Switch user
>Ok, so i have this cool console, but the only pokemon game i can play is... Pokken?, but that doesn't matter, in a year? i will be able to play a beautiful switch pokemon game! OH PLEASE DON'T SUCK

>>32999118
>I don't mind paying to play Pokemon online

Neck yourself

>>32999118
>can't emulate a Super Nintendo
what

>>32999505
it's not confirmed yet

>>32999148
>720p
>30 FPS

>>32999516
Paid online was confirmed a long time ago you denialfag

>>32999474
The switch actually does have a touchscreen in handheld mode. I've only ever gotten it to work on the main menu, though.

>>32999118
Yeah. Being an elitist on the internet arguing that "my game system is better than yours" when it's by the same company. No shit switch will be better, but 3DS had a crazy long and good lifespan with a huge game library. You're essentially trying to shitpost about "Xbox One is better han 360!"

>>32999118
Of course the 3DS can emulate the Super Nintendo. Why do you think Super Mario World is on the eShop?

File: image.jpg (46KB, 500x245px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 500x245px

>>32999474
>being mad about the touchscreen being removed

>>32999633
>480p
>30fps

>>32999828
3DS is 240p just as a reminder

>>32999754
really?, thats good news
>>32999816
(you)

>>32999147
I really commend Nintendo for sticking by their word and keeping the GBA games as an ambassador only thing.
They could have gone back on it and futher fucked everyone who paid an extra 100 to beta test the shittier version, but they didn't.

>>32999656
not for every games

So is this the 3DS circlejerk thread? Post your home menus, I'm always looking for new custom themes.

File: FUG.jpg (56KB, 400x480px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 400x480px

>>32999904
Mine isn't custom, but I like it all the same.

>>32999118
No stranger has ever been envious of you or admired you... ever...
nor will they ever

>>32999118
>Is there ANYTHING more embarrassing than being a 3DS user?
Being a dumbass kid who pretends he wasn't a 3DS user before the Switch was made?

>>32999142
M-moar?

>>32999819
It's the only good way to autistically order your boxes, though.

>>32999118
>he doesn't have a new nintendo 3ds
also, its not that it can't emulate a super nintendo, its that it doesn't have zr and zl buttons to switch from first player to second

>>32999118
As a Nintendo fanboy I can agree with this image op. Good job you even triggered most of VP

>>33001073
>VP
That triggers me more than OP's low-quality bait.

>>33001117
It isn't low quality considering how everyone went for it

>>32999121
>frogposting
>there is no frogs in that image
What did he mean by this?

>>33001342
>What is cosmogs face