>>32987041
why is charizard such a fucking manlet
>>32987055
Because it's a lizard RPing as a dragon.
>>32987041
No, it'll be SM with a higher resolution.
>>32987041
>>32987055
>5'07"
NO THIS ISN'T SUPPOSED TO BE CANON
>>32987041
From where is that?
>>32987055
ur mum is a manlet
>>32987041
Yes
>>32987067
No it won't
Textures are far too detailed.
They'll look like that recent arcade game where the low-res textures and low-poly environments are hidden behind HDR lighting and bloom.
Next generation
>>32987041
Only Pokken will. Game Freak is too lazy to actually produce these kind of graphics from a mainline Pogey game.
>>32987041
What game even is that?
>>32987281
Lol it would take bandai much longer too do it with 800 Pokemon not just 21
>>32987207
I have hope too.
>>32987041
I hope not. The graphics are fitting the way they are. Any more detail would expose flaws like charizard, dragons, and fishes not having scales or mammalian pokemon not having fur. Right now, electrode's model is weird(its face is just lines on a smooth sphere), I don't think it would translate better in even better graphics
>>32987230
>detailed
>too overdesigned
Honestly wtf is with pokemon fans, EVERYTHING IS OVERDESIGNED and everything is too detailed.
>>32988080
this post is too detailed and overdesigned
>>32987041
>>32987067
>>32987281
Literally just rip the assets from the arcade game. They already got the models improved for it.
>>32988106
Those are the same models from the 3DS, anon.
>>32988106
The models are the exact same, only some of the animations change.
>>32988113
>>32988157
>They already got the models improved for it
That's what I was implying when I said that
>>32987281
Lazy? You mean know what's better for the series than a bunch of graphicfags.
>>32987041
Gamefreak is the EA/Treyarch of Nintendo.
Crapping out games without putting in any effort because they know the series still makes money.
>>32988283
people saying this always triggered me back in gen 5 but now it's become true
>>32987041
That is one happy charizard
>>32988080
wut
I'm saying there's no way they would put the effort into having textures that detailed. Lots of details = high resolution = more engine resources and takes longer to make = more expensive.
>>32987041
did you saw 3ds graphic? they cannot do that
A lot of 3DS games have pretty decent models, which make the move to platforms with higher output resolutions paired with higher quality textures. Look at the Ace Attorney games and their mobile ports.
The 3DS Pokemon models are already high quality, and you can look at them in any model viewer to see that.
They'll likely use them with high-resolution textures and bump maps, along with a good lighting engine.
Even without those things, the 3DS games look pretty nice upscaled in Citra, so I have no doubt the games will look great on the Switch.
>>32988455
It's a shame USUM are coming out on the 3DS. I can't wait for the following games to be on the Switch because the model quality will be better, and because it won't shit itself when trying to load more than four models on screen during battles.
>>32987230
>>32987281
>>32987513
t. Cum gargling niggers
>>32987041
y-yeah, it's not like they would do a lazy job on a new hardware, r-right guys?
>>32987068
There are people here who don't have switches and getting mad they can't emulate on there shitty computers because the textures are too high
>mfw even with the new hardware game's still going to run at 30FPS with hickups here and there
>>32990130
We'll it's upgrade over 5fps and 240p
Normies will feel like it's the best thing ever
>>32988106
Dude these are game freak models
>>32988327
>the pokemon me franchise
>>32992483
are you retarded
>>32987041
That does NOT look good fyi.
>>32987055
because japanese are tiny.
>>32988283
>EA
You mean GF is the NoA of Nintendo? Actualyl insinuating EA (Treyarch ?) are more cancerous than NoA. Kek.
Is 2019 gonna be the best year?
Toy story 4
Lion king live action
HD Pokemon game
>>32994417
HD Pokémon games are 2018
>>32994417
>Toy story 4
>>32993100
oops
>me the pokemon franchise
>>32996550
so yes
>>32994572