ITT: realistic pokemon
>>32984303
made me reply
You first, OP
>>32984303
can we not have this thread again please? thanks
>>32984409
yeah, shame on OP for wanting something other than a shitposting thread.
>Shayrimp
I raffed
>>32984303
Is that a metapod?
Let's post ACTUAL realistic Pokemon. I'll start.
>>32984619
>six limbs
>realistic
>>32984619
?
>>32985154
Fug. Meant for >>32984644
>>32985154
Charizard is not an insect. He's a reptile most likely
>>32984644
artistic liberties are still allowed. You may as well call it unrealistic just because there's fire on its tail.
>>32985348
>Shitty organic water cannons
MagnetCrabs never stops disappointing.
>>32985521
>how dare an artist making a realistic pokemon make a pokemon more realistic!
so this is the power of autism
>>32985610
>how dare you have opinions about an artist's choice of design!
this is how you sounded like
>>32985164
The issue with 6 limbs on a dragon is that it could not possibly have the muscle structure to have 4 arms/legs and wings and still have all of them function perfectly.
>>32984416
To be fair, Arvalis actually did comment on this pic on DA before he began his own realistic Pokemon project.iirc he said something like "This is awesome"/"This is incredible!"